Galaxy
I dont want anyone to be harmed whatever they have done. I want prisons to be segregated by sex.
I also want victims of sexual assault not to be further victimised by having their Male rapist described as she.
How will Bryson's conviction appear in the 'Statistics'?
The offences were committed when Bryson was a man... but is now convicted - as a woman?
I also want victims of sexual assault not to be further victimised by having their Male rapist described as she.
Yes, I find that somewhat grotesque.
But what is even more grotesque (IMO) is that Bryson's defence has attempted to portray the defendant as a victim because of his emotional turmoil at the time of his marriage breakdown. Which, apparently, precludes him from being a 'predatory' male.
Edward Targowski KC, for the defence, described the three main witnesses in the trial as “vulnerable”, adding: “And that includes Isla Bryson.”
The Defence has introduced the idea that rape is somewhat 'understandable' so long as the man isn't considered predatory, and is going through emotional troubles. I know he didn't actually say that, but it is what is inferred, isn't it?
If Bryson is compos mentis, then she at the time of the rapes should've been able to understand that No means No, and that rape is rape. And if she's not rational, then one can question her commitment to identifying as a woman - no? She was, apparently, aware at the age of four that she was in the 'wrong body'. 
Bryson's ex wife says she's a sham and is scamming to avoid being detained in a male environment. But then she (Bryson's ex-wife) obviously has an axe to grind.