Gransnet forums

News & politics

Hancock's indiscretion could cost him millions

(70 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Thu 02-Mar-23 12:09:48

Following on from the thread about Hancock and the release of data.

I mentioned that the data would in fact be covered by the data protection act …………

Well guess what😄

Those who were never consulted to allow their data to be revealed are considering suing Hancock.

Personally I think that the government ought to be taking him to court. But of course that will never happen

Whitewavemark2 Thu 02-Mar-23 14:35:24

Urmstongran

Oakeshott will have sabotaged her professional standing. She will be vilified by some folk and lauded by others. Personally I feel her action in revealing all has given us, the general public a wider understanding of what really was going on between Ministers and their SPADs.

Isn’t she married to Richard Tice from Reform (previously UKIP)? Ulterior motives at play I suspect.

Absolutely.

Interestingly Oakeshott revealed the links between the Russia and leave campaigners

Isabel Oakeshott had a tip off. A person "high up in govt" with intelligence connections rang Richard Tice who passed it on to her.

This call prompted Isabel Oakeshott to go back into the Banks emails. And make a shock discovery.

This statement has not previously been published.

In it, she says: "I have no doubt that Banks & Wigmore have been acting as agents of influence of the Russian state"

Whitewavemark2 Thu 02-Mar-23 14:36:34

I’m not sure what happened there but the file reveals a statement by Oakeshott

Grantanow Thu 02-Mar-23 15:03:44

I don't much like Oakeshott but she has done a public service. Ministers tend to think that what is in the public interest is what they say it is (and not what the public are interested in) but disclosure of what former Ministers thought about teachers, etc. is in in my opinion in the public interest. It demonstrates prejudice amongst those who govern us. I think she and the Telegraph have a good public interest defence. No doubt more is to come. Gagging order anyone?

Katie59 Thu 02-Mar-23 15:12:44

Having signed a non disclosure agreement presumably she will now have to face court action.

Ministers obviously have disagreements on policy and frank opinions of other people and groups, as we all do, but if you can’t trust a colleague who has signed a non disclosure agreement, who can you trust

AGAA4 Thu 02-Mar-23 15:14:34

It's always been obvious that this government are contemptuous of the people who are and have been the backbone of this country.
They have done so much damage and are arrogant enough to call others ar**s.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 02-Mar-23 15:17:14

Katie59

Having signed a non disclosure agreement presumably she will now have to face court action.

Ministers obviously have disagreements on policy and frank opinions of other people and groups, as we all do, but if you can’t trust a colleague who has signed a non disclosure agreement, who can you trust

The opinion I’ve heard so far is that she wont.

Don’t get me wrong - I can’t bear her, but she has played a blinder here.

I also think her revelations about Russian influence in the referendum was also never given the publicity it deserved, and the fact that she was/is a strong brexiter makes it even more impressive.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 02-Mar-23 16:13:45

Todays statement from Oakeshott - the saga continues

MaizieD Thu 02-Mar-23 17:07:02

Blogger lawyer David Allen Green had something to say about non disclosure agreements today.

Basically, they're not really worth the paper they're written on

davidallengreen.com/2023/03/ndas-and-the-public-interest-a-beginners-guide-for-matt-hancock-and-others/

MaizieD Thu 02-Mar-23 17:09:35

I'm surprised that Hancock even trusted her to ghost write his memoir after the Cameron/pigs head affair and her disclosure about Banks and Russian influence.

Jaxjacky Thu 02-Mar-23 17:22:55

Perhaps Hancock should have paid her for writing his book.

grannyactivist Thu 02-Mar-23 17:26:54

It was Oakeshott who broke the story that her ‘friend and confidant’ Vicky Pryce had taken her husband’s speeding points. When Pryce was sent to prison for it I remember someone remarked that Oakeshott was a brilliant journalist, but a terrible friend.

welbeck Thu 02-Mar-23 17:33:54

who is banks, and wigmore ?

MayBee70 Thu 02-Mar-23 17:35:32

grannyactivist

It was Oakeshott who broke the story that her ‘friend and confidant’ Vicky Pryce had taken her husband’s speeding points. When Pryce was sent to prison for it I remember someone remarked that Oakeshott was a brilliant journalist, but a terrible friend.

And she told Trump that the British Ambassador had said he was useless.

varian Thu 02-Mar-23 18:24:36

Isabel Oakshott is a far right ultra brexit journalist, living with the leader of some absurd party which is more brexitty than the Brexit party.

She and her partner are out to out-brexit Farage.

Just how stupid would Hancock have to be to hand over all his whatsapps to Oakshott?

Fleurpepper Thu 02-Mar-23 18:26:53

I would not trust her with my worst tarantula.

ShazzaKanazza Thu 02-Mar-23 18:57:07

I listen to Talk radio/tv when in the car and I aren’t happy that Isabel and Richard Tyce both use the station as a platform for the Reform party which I’m very uncomfortable with. She is another back stabber as we now know. I’m disgusted with the lot of them to be honest.

Casdon Thu 02-Mar-23 19:02:39

varian

Isabel Oakshott is a far right ultra brexit journalist, living with the leader of some absurd party which is more brexitty than the Brexit party.

She and her partner are out to out-brexit Farage.

Just how stupid would Hancock have to be to hand over all his whatsapps to Oakshott?

I must admit I’m struggling to reconcile her views with this leak, there must be more to it than ‘in the public interest’ surely, but I can’t see how Reform would benefit?

Whitewavemark2 Thu 02-Mar-23 19:03:08

Aren’t we all !

It simply shows what type of person we have allowed to influence so much of the political narrative.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 02-Mar-23 19:03:49

That was to shazza

varian Thu 02-Mar-23 19:24:49

Isabel Oakshott is a great favourite of the Brexit Broadcasting Corporation, appearing umpteen times on QT and the Daily Politics.

Her role seems to be so bonkers brexitty as to to make Tories looked reasonable.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 02-Mar-23 19:27:15

Her and Farage

MaizieD Thu 02-Mar-23 19:27:51

Jay Rayner on twitter:

Choosing between Hancock and Oakshott is like wondering if it's best to get ebola or rabies

MaizieD Thu 02-Mar-23 19:29:31

welbeck

who is banks, and wigmore ?

Banks and Wigmore?

Leading Leave vote campaigners. Banks s suspected of having been bankrolled by Russia.

MayBee70 Thu 02-Mar-23 20:22:17

Urmstongran

Oakeshott will have sabotaged her professional standing. She will be vilified by some folk and lauded by others. Personally I feel her action in revealing all has given us, the general public a wider understanding of what really was going on between Ministers and their SPADs.

Isn’t she married to Richard Tice from Reform (previously UKIP)? Ulterior motives at play I suspect.

She’s married with three children. She and Tice, (also married) are in a relationship. I don’t know if they’re both divorced now.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 02-Mar-23 20:37:35

I rather think that they are married