Gransnet forums

News & politics

Freedom of speech in the UK?????

(91 Posts)
ronib Thu 25-May-23 04:41:39

Well in some ways the cancelled scientist, probably brilliant, is a bit of a twit.

He must be aware of the ultra cautious approach surrounding Porton Down - in fact it is a very secure biological weapons military establishment. There’s no way a potential unknown threat should be allowed access to officials /information at the conference arranged by Porton Down.

Of course the scientist can tweet away about the government to his heart’s content but don’t be surprised at consequences in the area of work he finds himself. He could so easily be working for any government…..

MaizieD Thu 25-May-23 01:09:13

bylinetimes.com/2023/05/23/i-was-cancelled-by-sunaks-government-for-criticising-them-on-twitter/

Here's the cancelled scientist.

Galaxy Wed 24-May-23 22:13:46

I hate de platforming, I find people who cant listen to different viewpoints incredibly weak.

Freya5 Wed 24-May-23 22:09:35

varian

Exactly maddyone

Why should experts in any field be de-platformed if they criticise thje Tory Party?

You can say that about any deplatforming, why is it allowed to happen. University Hall or conferance room. Don't agree with any of it.

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 24-May-23 21:12:07

Their conference, their decision on who to invite.

HousePlantQueen Wed 24-May-23 20:24:59

Germanshepherdsmum

They probably have someone equally well qualified to speak.

and praise the party at the same time, presumably!

VioletSky Wed 24-May-23 20:10:42

We don't have freedom of speech in the UK, we have Individual liberty based on Tolerance and Respect

But obviously they don't like being disagreed with and it just looks a bit weak

varian Wed 24-May-23 20:00:19

Exactly maddyone

Why should experts in any field be de-platformed if they criticise thje Tory Party?

maddyone Wed 24-May-23 11:00:06

Apparently it was a government event. He says he is a Lib Dem. Actually I don’t see any conflict in that, except apparently he wrote Bloody Tories on his Twitter account. I suppose that’s the reason, although as an expert on this subject, I don’t think he should have been uninvited. It should have been made clear to him that this was a conference to discuss and learn about chemical weapons, and not to criticise any political party.

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 24-May-23 10:56:31

They probably have someone equally well qualified to speak.

Wyllow3 Wed 24-May-23 10:53:04

Germanshepherdsmum

If it’s a government-run conference why should they invite someone who has openly criticised them?

Surely one can't seriously suggest that a scientific conference should only include those who agree with the Party currently in government?

Jackiest Wed 24-May-23 10:47:16

You will never learn anything if you only listen to people who agree with you.

Fleurpepper Wed 24-May-23 10:08:20

I would have thought what he had to say about such a massivley important subject, with the expertise that got him invited to talk about it- would have been more important.

Smileless2012 Wed 24-May-23 09:38:47

Good point GSM.

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 24-May-23 09:35:42

If it’s a government-run conference why should they invite someone who has openly criticised them?

varian Wed 24-May-23 09:29:12

An expert in chemical weapons who had been invited to speak at a conference has had his invitation withdrawn because he had criticised the Tories.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/may/23/dan-kaszeta-banned-from-uk-government-event-for-tweets-criticised-tories