So Andrew Malkinson should never have been convicted of rape and the whole case was flawed from the start. However, there are now questions being asked as to why he was not granted an appeal in 2009 when new evidence came to light. I do wonder how much he was the victim not only of a botched police job, poor judgement by the CPS and probably poor representation but also of austerity and an unwillingness to spend money on an appeal. I used to be proud of British justice but I now wonder how many more "Malkinsons" linger in jail whilst being completely innocent. Thoughts?
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
