Gransnet forums

News & politics

Nightingale Hospitals

(80 Posts)
Dinahmo Sat 04-Nov-23 18:04:19

The Good Law Project together with the Daily Mirror have been investigating the Nightingale Hospitals. As we all know these were a waste of money because they were hardly used. Not enough staff.

9000 beds and mattresses were purchased at a cost of £24m to the NHS. The average price of each bed was £2,667.00. 6000 of these, being unfit for clinical use have been sold off for £410k. Some for as little as £6 each.

I do not know who these beds were purchased from, nor do I know who was responsible for organising the purchases. No doubt another crony. There's no reason to suppose not.
Yet another example of govt uselessness.

spabbygirl Thu 09-Nov-23 12:34:59

I despair of this gov't use of our money, I want my money to go to refugees, people who are going through a hard time, the NHS, education, but it seems like our money is going to already wealthy billionaires. Its like they know they're only going to be in power a limited time so they're emptying the treasury whilst they can

Milest0ne Thu 09-Nov-23 12:23:21

I know army medics were employed on end of life covid wards
The same medics went to NI to give vaccinations but several people refused to have jabs from the army !!!

Philippa111 Thu 09-Nov-23 11:21:14

I am in no way a fan of this Tory set of useless and often corrupt and despicable individuals and I know this was and is a complete waste of money.
But reflecting on what is happening around our world at the moment we are fortunate to have had that resource even though it was totally off the mark.

I think everyone panicked with Covid and of course it was a situation that was wide open to corruption and ‘jobs for the boys’ of which the tories took full advantage.

Could these spaces not now be converted and used for people who are homeless, refugees etc.?

Margiknot Wed 08-Nov-23 10:53:14

At the beginning of the pandemic- many people in all walks of life found themselves having to ‘fill in’ roles they were ill equipped at the time to perform. Parents home schooling children, (often whilst juggling work) workers setting up home IT in the only space available, medical staff having to try and transfer face to face clinic skills to video calls-the government - many with no scientific or medical expertise or even basic knowledge-trying to make suitable decisions.

Grantanow Wed 08-Nov-23 10:08:38

Hindsight has nothing to do with it. Lack of foresight regarding insufficient NHS staffing was and remains the problem. Wasn't even mentioned in the King's Speech yet the long waiting list is of grave concern to many people.

Calipso Tue 07-Nov-23 17:50:28

Aveline

You really don't understand my perspective. I won't persist. There was a bigger picture than the one you prefer to perseverate on. As previously stated if only you lot were running the country everything would be absolutely perfect at all times.

I'm with you Aveline. This about sums it up

Aveline Tue 07-Nov-23 17:40:36

Then you clearly are wrong. It's a matter of perspective. Step back a bit and look. Don't get lost in the nitty gritty and personalities

Whitewavemark2 Tue 07-Nov-23 17:24:04

Aveline

Sigh. I'm not talking about them but about us armchair critics. Hard decisions had to be made by the government. No time to ponderously debate options. The people involved were humans. Nobody was deliberately getting anything wrong. They all did their best at the time and it was a precarious time.

Well, then you clearly have not been listening to the covid enquiry.

Aveline Tue 07-Nov-23 17:15:18

Sigh. I'm not talking about them but about us armchair critics. Hard decisions had to be made by the government. No time to ponderously debate options. The people involved were humans. Nobody was deliberately getting anything wrong. They all did their best at the time and it was a precarious time.

MaizieD Tue 07-Nov-23 14:54:31

I think the problem for me, Aveline, is that your insistence on us speaking with hindsight resonates with Johnson on PMQs constantly calling Starmer 'Captain Hindsight' when in fact Starmer was usually ahead of the curve.

For example, in the autumn of 2020 he was calling for a 'circuit breaker' lockdown over half term which didn't happen. Instead, schools were ordered to reopen after half term and then closed a day later...

Watching the covid Inquiry now and it was the opinion of the Covid Task Force, and the medics who were feeding into it that an earlier lockdown at that period would have most likely have prevented, or at least considerably slowed the rising number of infections.

In fact, we've learned from the Inquiry that the opposition parties had regular briefings from the Cabinet Office, so the judgements of the LOTO would be informed by those briefings. He had the same information as the government... No 'hindsight'.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 07-Nov-23 14:19:48

Aveline

Because they might be needed!

For what? Housing the homeless or immigrants, because they could never have been used as a hospital as they were devoid of clinicians.

Aveline Tue 07-Nov-23 14:13:43

Because they might be needed!

Whitewavemark2 Tue 07-Nov-23 14:12:27

Aveline

Treasury vs scientists and academics Vs psychological aspects of the general public. So much to weigh up and decide between. I'm not interested in nitpicking personalities involved. Just looking at the bigger picture.
Despite everything the vaccines were developed and rapidly rolled out and furlough saved many livelihoods.

And the nightingale hospitals were built because?

Aveline Tue 07-Nov-23 14:04:41

Me? Right leaning? Couldn't be more wrong.

Dinahmo Tue 07-Nov-23 14:02:54

Aveline

Treasury vs scientists and academics Vs psychological aspects of the general public. So much to weigh up and decide between. I'm not interested in nitpicking personalities involved. Just looking at the bigger picture.
Despite everything the vaccines were developed and rapidly rolled out and furlough saved many livelihoods.

Most of the EU countries were not far behind us and the cost to them was less. The number of deaths in the UK was 9.12 per 1000 population and France was 9.51. Not a big difference considering Johnson paid over the odds in order to beat the other EU countries to get the vaccines.

We are looking at the bigger picture - just a different version to you. We are looking at the amount of money wasted, not only with the covid vaccines but also the fraud connected to procurement but also with the furlough schemes. Those monies could be available for helping the poor of the UK.

Finally, you said "if only you lot were running the country everything would be absolutely perfect at all times" .From this I infer that you are not leftwards leaning and therefore can only be right leaning. In which case look at the mess that your lot have got us into

Aveline Tue 07-Nov-23 08:44:49

Treasury vs scientists and academics Vs psychological aspects of the general public. So much to weigh up and decide between. I'm not interested in nitpicking personalities involved. Just looking at the bigger picture.
Despite everything the vaccines were developed and rapidly rolled out and furlough saved many livelihoods.

MaizieD Tue 07-Nov-23 07:39:08

What 'bigger picture' would that be, Aveline?

All you've done is mutter 'hindsight', despite the fact that a great deal was known at the time.

Why don't you tell us what convinces you that the handling of the covid crisis couldn't possibly have been any better?

Aveline Tue 07-Nov-23 06:48:14

You really don't understand my perspective. I won't persist. There was a bigger picture than the one you prefer to perseverate on. As previously stated if only you lot were running the country everything would be absolutely perfect at all times.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 07-Nov-23 02:40:44

Aveline

I say it again. So easy with 20:20 hindsight.

That is a totally wrong statement. You have clearly not been paying attention.

It was absolutely obvious from the time that the nightingale hospitals were first mooted that they could never be staffed. It was said at the time and subsequently (very quickly) proven correct.

MaizieD Tue 07-Nov-23 00:22:58

Aveline

I'm sure you have been writing about procurement. As previously stated, waiting for NHS procurement procedure would have taken months to grind through- time we just didn't have.

Yup, they managed to expedite procurement, but strangely, though businesses such as suppliers of PPE and ventilators, who had already supplied the NHS, were rallying round and offering increased production and vastly increased purchases of supplies from their usual sources, they were sidelined while contracts were rushed through the VIP channel for friends and associates of the tories. There was a great deal of publicity about it at the time..

Incidentally, it's now been admitted that Michelle Mone and her husband were involved with the company which she sponsored through the VIP channel, which wasn't even set up until days after it had been accepted as a supplier and then proceeded to supply over £100million worth of overpriced , useless gowns. And passed over a share of the profits to her husband..
Having utterly denied any involvement with the company ever since, and threatened legal action, it turns out that they were lying...

Then there was Hancocks local pub landlord who supplied defective test tubes...

paddyann54 Mon 06-Nov-23 23:38:52

The Glasgow Nightingale hospital was used for clinics ,I know this because my OH had appointments there for scans and tests that we thought he wouldn't get because of Covid .
There were security staff on the carpark entrance making sure only the patient went in to the SEC bulding and that other people in the car stayed in the car .
We were there 3 times ,one of which was a scan for an aneurism that I didn't know he was due but was very grateful for as his Dad died of an aortic aneurism .
It made sense to have the clinics there and stop the public going nto hospitals with covid patients

Casdon Mon 06-Nov-23 21:46:55

MaizieD

Dinahmo

Aveline

I say it again. So easy with 20:20 hindsight.

It's not 20:20 hindsight. Some of us have been writing about procurement since 2020.

She doesn't believe us, Dinahmo grin

If Gnet had a better search facility I could probably find some threads...

They are certainly there. Here’s one from 2020.
www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&cx=010995057459380558086:wn3vvylhmc4&q=https://www.gransnet.com/forums/coronavirus/1289375-We-should-have-locked-down-earlier&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjftN-grLCCAxWjFRAIHXa5CjwQFnoECAUQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0B1HxBrHp_wFp84hKoTnyj

Dinahmo Mon 06-Nov-23 21:01:03

Aveline

I'm sure you have been writing about procurement. As previously stated, waiting for NHS procurement procedure would have taken months to grind through- time we just didn't have.

You might like to read these:

www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj.o2495

www.transparency.org.uk/track-and-trace-uk-PPE-procurement-corruption-risk-VIP-lane

Of course you don't have to believe them

Harris27 Mon 06-Nov-23 18:08:02

That’s just what my sister said today vegans rocks.

Aveline Mon 06-Nov-23 18:05:00

I'm sure you have been writing about procurement. As previously stated, waiting for NHS procurement procedure would have taken months to grind through- time we just didn't have.