Prince Harry loses and wins

A Merry Christmas, Dr. Watson.

Hope phone hackers take notice.

For Eazy, well, YOU can indeed sneer, but you don't actually KNOW what happened in that family, and you certainly don't know, despite that frankly arrogant reply, what strains losing your mother at a relatively young age might do? I lost both my parents before I was 17, and it definitely affected me, and I wasn't in the public gaze.

As for the link, being 'hacked' doesn't affect your ability to check the report on that link, you can link to GN OK can't you???????!! The report details i'views with Morgan, and a book of his, plus evidence at Leveson, making it quite clear that he most certainly WAS fully aware of phone hacking.

You made it so G&T.

Mollygo

Quite what was your post about then Glorianny?
You asked, I answered.
Apparently that was wrong. No surprise there then.

It is panto season!!!
Oh no it wasn't!

Quite what was your post about then Glorianny?
You asked, I answered.
Apparently that was wrong. No surprise there then.

??? Rabbit hole?
Who has said on this thread that phone hacking isn’t wrong? Did I miss it? Could you point me to the post?
Quite what was your post about then Mollygo?
You asked, I answered.
Apparently that was wrong.
Merry Christmas

You can talk about what you like Glorianny. My post wasn't about that. I've explained it to you.
It is panto season isn't it!!! You made it so.
You’re famous for not answering questions.

Mollygo

But I’m talking about whether Harry was right to take the matter of phone hacking to court, and I haven’t found anyone who said that he was wrong.

You can talk about what you like Mollygo. My post wasn't about that. I've explained it to you.
It is panto season isn't it!!!

But I’m talking about whether Harry was right to take the matter of phone hacking to court, and I haven’t found anyone who said that he was wrong.

Thank you Casdon

Mollygo

??? Rabbit hole?
Who has said on this thread that phone hacking isn’t wrong? Did I miss it? Could you point me to the post?

The rabbit hole Mollygo as you require a detailed explanation, is that the democratically elected government, meant to support and represent legality and the interests of the ordinary people, chose, instead of supporting it, to dump the Leveson Inquiry part 2, which Lord Leveson said was abandoning those ordinary people who had had their phone hacked www.theguardian.com/media/2018/mar/01/leveson-inquiry-part-2-cancellation-condemned-by-labour-as-breach-of-trust
And it took court action by a prince to show he was right.
Maybe it's not a rabbit hole
Maybe it's just the panto season.

Casdon 👋👏👍🏻

Anniebach

Harry was one of four test cases, have the findings of the other three been released

Yes.
‘Harry was the most high-profile of more than 100 claimants – including the singer Cheryl and the estate of George Michael – who were involved in the wider litigation. Harry’s case, which was used as one of four test cases to establish facts that can be used to award damages to other complainants, was heard alongside claims brought by the Coronation Street actors Michael Turner and Nikki Sanderson, and Fiona Wightman, the former wife of the comedian Paul Whitehouse.

Turner was awarded £31,650 in damages after he also brought a phone-hacking claim against the publisher; Sanderson and Wightman had their claims dismissed because they were made too late.’

From The Guardian.

my

Harry was one of four test cases, have the findings of the other three been released

Well, Dr. Watson, we all know what trauma Harry has suffered because he keeps reminding us of it, endlessly.

Sorry, but I don't click on links ever since mu computer was hacked recently.

Its not all due to Harry as has been pointed out he was one in a number of complainants, its just that the media has chosen to point its glare at him for everyone to gawp at.

Harry’s case was selected as one of four test cases, on behalf of the hundred others, and was the first to be heard. That’s why it’s important, it’s a landmark victory. It’s all explained in the Reuters article I posted earlier. Other misdemeanours are irrelevant to this case, which was heard on the basis of the evidence presented specifically about incidences f phone hacking.

Seems it’s all due to Harry who, as we have been reminded, suffered trauma ,

Praise of Harry is permitted on this thread !

??? Rabbit hole?
Who has said on this thread that phone hacking isn’t wrong? Did I miss it? Could you point me to the post?

Number given of those suing is 100 ,

Elton John and others brought the case too.

I sometimes think I've fallen down the rabbit hole. An estranged member of the RF bringing into the open something the government were happy to leave buried. Suppose Harry hadn't brought this case would it be OK then that phone hacking became just something we accepted the press did and no one was really responsible?

Byline Times has done some sterling work this year, despite all sorts of legal threats.

I think the lack of reporting elsewhere on this case isn’t surprising, but does reinforce the points that have been made, here and elsewhere, about the control of information to the public.