Sentence for Nottingham killer?

Is that what they are angry about though? when I have read their concerns it's been about how he was allowed to be on the streets considering some of what had happened previously. I haven't heard their comments on the sentence however that us probably my omission. I think it is obvious he needs never to be released.

I watched the sentencing. The judge said he would probably remain in the hospital for the rest of his life. He remarked that prison was inappropriate because there could not be certainty that he would take his medication - his refusal to accept that there is anything wrong with him having resulted in the medication not being taken. There were sound legal reasons for the charge being manslaughter due to his mental state. It’s unclear what could have been done by the various agencies - he had been sectioned on four occasions. Such people walk among us, what is to be done unless and until they commit a criminal offence?

The sentence is for an indefinite period and the judge said it may well be for life.
IMO Cabbie, being incarcerated in a secure psychiatric hospital is not only the most appropriate, but only option. He couldn't possibly be accommodated in the prison system.

I agree that the victims families have every right to be angry Galaxy but I think that should be a separate issue, and have nothing to do with the prosecution accepting a guilty plea to manslaughter, on the grounds of diminished responsibility which has resulted in the sentence handed down.

Why do you refer to "justice" in inverted commas, Cabbie?

I think they were rightly very angry, there is a history of opportunities missed with regard to this offender.

He was not charged with murder and the sentence did not say
for life