eazybee
If elected, Trump is coming for he and Meghan, and not in a good way.
I really doubt it. Trump is just posturing.
Harry was granted his US visa by the Trump administration.
It’s just been announced, Prince Harry has lost his appeal to have armed security provided when he is in Britain.
I’m not surprised.
eazybee
If elected, Trump is coming for he and Meghan, and not in a good way.
I really doubt it. Trump is just posturing.
Harry was granted his US visa by the Trump administration.
MayBee70
I do wonder if the ill health suffered by some members of the Royal family have been exacerbated due to stress caused by some of the things Harry has written about. As has just been pointed out on Sky News he did write about how many people he’d killed when he was in the army and also, as Rosie just pointed out, he now chooses to live in a country where every other person carries a gun. I used to be very fond of Harry, mainly because of some unpublicised charity work he did locally but I find his behaviour these days to be very distasteful.
I agree, Maybee
Mostly, I find it all very sad.
Happy to see that Harry lost this case, this is not hatred, but just don’t want his bodyguards running around with guns in our soil. If it means he doesn’t come here it’s no loss. Is that hatred? I don’t think so, I do however, dislike backstabbing people.
Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.
I do wonder if the ill health suffered by some members of the Royal family have been exacerbated due to stress caused by some of the things Harry has written about. As has just been pointed out on Sky News he did write about how many people he’d killed when he was in the army and also, as Rosie just pointed out, he now chooses to live in a country where every other person carries a gun. I used to be very fond of Harry, mainly because of some unpublicised charity work he did locally but I find his behaviour these days to be very distasteful.
Smileless2012
Callistemon Now Harry needs protecting from a posse of Gransnetters
Perhaps you could do what Glorianny and VS haven't done despite being asked Syracute and give just one example of hate that's been expressed on this thread.
Comments like this are pretty hateful
Desdemona
When he visited the UK recently didn't the British Police escort him to and from the airport?
He hasn't lost the right to security altogether if he comes here.
His security level has been downgraded and he would receive security appropriate to the occasion.
However even you can't dispute that he is probably more at risk than any other Royal.
Even me? What exactly do you mean by that? 🤔
Why is Harry at more risk than any other Royal? Do you have inside information?
Looking forward to their answers to that Callistemon21.
Syracute
Smileless2012
What hatred VS? If you and Glorianny are going to imply that there are posters on this thread expressing hatred of H then back it up.
You are joking ! One glance through this thread is proof of the hatred here on GN and the absolute need for armed security .
You are aware that the public don't carry guns in the UK aren't you? Unlike the States where he lives, far more danger to him and his family there I'd have thought. Do you honestly think a granny is a danger to him or his family?
I don't hate Harry, I do think he's done some very unpleasant, mean things. Some of the stuff they've said about family members was awful. Implying William didn't marry Catherine for love but 'suitability' is just spiteful, as well as obviously wrong. You could almost say he's demonstrated his 'hatred' for William, Catherine and Camilla in print and word.
merlotgran
^One glance through this thread is proof of the hatred here on GN and the absolute need for armed security^
Because of us?? 😮😮😮
Gangsta Grannies
I neither like nor dislike Harry and Meghan but I did not like what they did to their families.
What Harry was asking for was a higher level of security when he visits the UK but the Judge ruled that the downgraded level of Ravec he should receive as a non-working member of the Royal Family is appropriate.
The high court judge Sir Peter Lane concluded that Ravec’s approach was not irrational nor procedurally unfair.
He will still receive a police protection if the occasion is considered appropriate.
He’ll be a squillion short after he’s paid the legal bills.
With his squillions ,no doubt he could pay for security if he thinks it is necessary. Quite reasonable, I would have thought.
Callistemon Now Harry needs protecting from a posse of Gransnetters 
Perhaps you could do what Glorianny and VS haven't done despite being asked Syracute and give just one example of hate that's been expressed on this thread.
Joseann
Rosie51 Those photos remind me of the ones at that
boringJubilee parade when Louis had a strop. His grandfather Charles was the only one who seemed able to placate him, affectionately sitting him on his lap.
Lovely, Joseann 🙂
One glance through this thread is proof of the hatred here on GN and the absolute need for armed security
Because of us?? 😮😮😮
Now Harry needs protecting from a posse of Gransnetters
😂
Smileless2012
What hatred VS? If you and Glorianny are going to imply that there are posters on this thread expressing hatred of H then back it up.
You are joking ! One glance through this thread is proof of the hatred here on GN and the absolute need for armed security .
Sometimes other people's comments aren't about "you"?
If the cap doesn't fit or other similar sayings
if any other so called celebrity wanted security they would have to pay for it, he is no different, he made his choice.
Rosie51
Glorianny Seems a bit hard on the kids and on Charles, who probably won't see his grandkids (mind I'm not sure he'll be that bothered, he's not really affectionate is he?)
Goodness me, all those photos of Charles not being affectionate!
Rosie51
Lovely photos!
Glorianny
Callistemon21
He wants to pay for it himself but for his security to be able to be armed, as those protecting other members of the RF are
Not allowed here, it is against the law for bodyguards to carry any weapons.
Although it may well be legal in the USA.
No-one hates them, as you keep trying to assert, Glorianny, although they may dislike what they do and be weary of their shenanigans.Of course they don't Callistemon21 .
![]()
However even you can't dispute that he is probably more at risk than any other Royal.
As I said he will probably fly in and out of the UK occasionally, but Meghan and the children will not. Why would they? They are protected in the US. Here they would not be.
Seems a bit hard on the kids and on Charles, who probably won't see his grandkids (mind I'm not sure he'll be that bothered, he's not really affectionate is he?)
However even you can't dispute that he is probably more at risk than any other Royal.
Even me? What exactly do you mean by that? 🤔
Why is Harry at more risk than any other Royal? Do you have inside information?
I remember that too Joseann, but as Glorianny asserts, he's not affectionate 🙄🙄
Lovely photographs
Rosie51 Those photos remind me of the ones at that boring Jubilee parade when Louis had a strop. His grandfather Charles was the only one who seemed able to placate him, affectionately sitting him on his lap.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.