Gransnet forums

News & politics

Home Office Worker Arrested

(30 Posts)
zakouma66 Thu 18-Apr-24 10:20:01

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-68828054

The Home Office is not fit for purpose. Perhaps they are the ones at fault , not the much despised people in small boats.

growstuff Thu 18-Apr-24 18:40:32

I think it probably is too big and unwieldy, but I'm sure James Cleverly and Simon Case are on the case. (pun unintentional)

For some reason, I have images of Inspector Clouseau in my mind.

Casdon Thu 18-Apr-24 17:58:00

Sorry to be the party pooper, but John Reid didn’t actually say it, it was a senior civil servant - but he did want to split the Home Office into two, believing it was too unwieldy and inefficient. At the time he was lambasted by David Davies, the then Shadow Home Secretary for his alleged failure at managing his role.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

Callistemon21 Thu 18-Apr-24 16:54:15

Bodach

Wasn't it that venerable Scots Labour MP John Reid who famously said in 2006 that the Home Office wasn't fit for purpose? And he was Home Secretary at the time...

Was he meaning himself? His Government's ridiculous laws?
His top Mandarins?

Or the thousands of hardworking Home Office civil servants?

HousePlantQueen Thu 18-Apr-24 16:51:53

grin

Germanshepherdsmum Thu 18-Apr-24 16:34:13

I have of course studied criminal law in order to qualify but have never practised it, nor did any firm at which I worked take on criminal work. Human rights law - no way. Wasn’t invented when I was studying (that is a joke btw).

HousePlantQueen Thu 18-Apr-24 16:24:03

I rest my case. My mistake though, I understand from what she has posted that GSM is/was an accomplished and experienced conveyancing and property lawyer, not involved in criminal or, heaven forfend, human rights law. Thus my comment about lefty lawyers, the thrust and irony of which may have escaped you

Bodach Thu 18-Apr-24 16:21:33

Wasn't it that venerable Scots Labour MP John Reid who famously said in 2006 that the Home Office wasn't fit for purpose? And he was Home Secretary at the time...

Germanshepherdsmum Thu 18-Apr-24 16:13:18

Spinnaker

HousePlantQueen

Germanshepherdsmum

But your thread is about this one allegedly crooked official.

makes a change from blaming lefty lawyers

What a silly comment HPQ. The thread referring to lefty lawyers by GSM did in fact point out further along the discussion that it was Cherie Blair's Chambers that took the case on - not going to get much further left than her ? I would imagine GSM used her professional insight into these type of cases and has much knowledge regarding the type of lawyer that takes on such cases.

Thank you Spinnaker.

Callistemon21 Thu 18-Apr-24 16:08:40

zakouma66

Oh Calli, Have you been on the Sanatogen? wink You're on fire this afternoon.grin

Not yet 😁
Can't afford it on my pension.

zakouma66 Thu 18-Apr-24 15:57:48

Oh Calli, Have you been on the Sanatogen? wink You're on fire this afternoon.grin

Callistemon21 Thu 18-Apr-24 15:47:15

Now you're taking a headline about the Home Office Press Office and saying
The HO is not fit for purpose.

Is the Press Office representative of all of the 40,000 civil servants working for the Home Office?

Callistemon21 Thu 18-Apr-24 15:43:47

Yes, it is perfectly clear what you are saying and you are contradicting yourself:

I don't think the HO is fit for purpose
One crooked official doesn't make the HO unfit for purpose.

It's rather offensive to tar all Home Office employees with the same brush, don't you think?

Or perhaps you're not sure what you think?

Sarnia Thu 18-Apr-24 15:42:01

The Home Office is yet another thing that doesn't work as it should after 14 years of Tory rule. Not for much longer, hopefully. Going off on a tangent, where is Rishi Sunak these days?

zakouma66 Thu 18-Apr-24 15:33:08

petra

zakouma66

What on earth is it with this attention to detail/ thread police attitude?

I don't think the HO is fit for purpose. There are many articles from many sources saying just that. The Telegraph, independent bodies, ex personnel.

This one case does not make it poorly run organisation but it adds to to the catalogue of errors.

I think your arguing with yourself now 😂

I have no idea what you mean. I think it's perfectly clear what I'm saying. I can provide numerous links if you are interested.

The HO is not fit for purpose. This is yet another example of the state of affairs.

www.prweek.com/article/1865032/home-office-press-office-not-fit-purpose-editors-say

Spinnaker Thu 18-Apr-24 14:47:22

HousePlantQueen

Germanshepherdsmum

But your thread is about this one allegedly crooked official.

makes a change from blaming lefty lawyers

What a silly comment HPQ. The thread referring to lefty lawyers by GSM did in fact point out further along the discussion that it was Cherie Blair's Chambers that took the case on - not going to get much further left than her ? I would imagine GSM used her professional insight into these type of cases and has much knowledge regarding the type of lawyer that takes on such cases.

petra Thu 18-Apr-24 13:58:20

zakouma66

What on earth is it with this attention to detail/ thread police attitude?

I don't think the HO is fit for purpose. There are many articles from many sources saying just that. The Telegraph, independent bodies, ex personnel.

This one case does not make it poorly run organisation but it adds to to the catalogue of errors.

I think your arguing with yourself now 😂

Cossy Thu 18-Apr-24 13:47:17

nanna8

There are many crooked officials in many walks of life. Thinking banks, parliament, welfare, health, education. Nothing special with the home office.

I completely agree.

zakouma66 Thu 18-Apr-24 13:46:28

What on earth is it with this attention to detail/ thread police attitude?

I don't think the HO is fit for purpose. There are many articles from many sources saying just that. The Telegraph, independent bodies, ex personnel.

This one case does not make it poorly run organisation but it adds to to the catalogue of errors.

HousePlantQueen Thu 18-Apr-24 13:30:13

Germanshepherdsmum

But your thread is about this one allegedly crooked official.

makes a change from blaming lefty lawyers

zakouma66 Thu 18-Apr-24 12:26:53

One crooked official doesn't make the HO unfit for purpose. Added to the catalogue of problems, it is a cause for concern.

Hope that helps.

growstuff Thu 18-Apr-24 11:22:23

Maybe the OP should start a new thread about the problems with Atlas and so-called "merged identities" on the computer systems. Frankly, it is a scandal, which the media generally hasn't picked up.

I agree that one crooked official doesn't make the Home Office unfit for purpose. The fact that it's being investigated is a good thing in a way because it shows that bribes won't be tolerated. I would hope that work is going on undercover to investigate any other suspicious activity.

RosiesMaw Thu 18-Apr-24 11:16:56

zakouma66

There are many articles, podcasts, commentaries to the same effect from all shades of polictical opinion.

How about Faulty 71 million computer system for example?

Changing the subject

nanna8 Thu 18-Apr-24 11:14:42

There are many crooked officials in many walks of life. Thinking banks, parliament, welfare, health, education. Nothing special with the home office.

Casdon Thu 18-Apr-24 11:12:54

Well done to the honourable man who reported it, that must have taken some courage.

Callistemon21 Thu 18-Apr-24 11:12:12

Germanshepherdsmum

But your thread is about this one allegedly crooked official.

And then condemning everyone who works for the Home Office.