Gransnet forums

News & politics

King's first official portrait since the coronation

(170 Posts)
Jaxjacky Tue 14-May-24 20:20:28

I like it.

pascal30 Mon 20-May-24 15:01:52

Maggiemaybe

Luckygirl3

There is a very very damning review of the painting in the Guardian today - couldn't be worse!

No, it couldn’t. It’s so scathing you’d have thought there might be history between the critic and the artist but no, Jones says he’s met Yeo and liked him. He certainly doesn’t like his work!

amp.theguardian.com/artanddesign/article/2024/may/15/jonathan-yeo-portrait-of-charles-iii-review-a-cringeworthy-bit-of-facile-flattery

The Sunday Times was far more balanced

Callistemon21 Mon 20-May-24 14:58:02

25Avalon

Seems to me it’s like marmite except red in colour. You either love it or hate it.

Actually, I think it's like the curate's egg.
Which might go with marmite on toast 😀

25Avalon Mon 20-May-24 10:43:31

Seems to me it’s like marmite except red in colour. You either love it or hate it.

Maggiemaybe Sun 19-May-24 19:06:07

Luckygirl3

There is a very very damning review of the painting in the Guardian today - couldn't be worse!

No, it couldn’t. It’s so scathing you’d have thought there might be history between the critic and the artist but no, Jones says he’s met Yeo and liked him. He certainly doesn’t like his work!

amp.theguardian.com/artanddesign/article/2024/may/15/jonathan-yeo-portrait-of-charles-iii-review-a-cringeworthy-bit-of-facile-flattery

LottieLouise Sun 19-May-24 17:40:10

I like it, it makes a change from the old fashioned portraits that hang in the palace, this is very modern.

Glorianny Sun 19-May-24 17:38:33

M0nica

*Glorianny*. and you clearly didn't understand my post. Nit picking is someone one not agreeing wth the artist's interpretation.

Oh I absolutely understood it. I think most people today are aware of artistic licence. Unfortunately some people can't recognise a joke.

M0nica Sun 19-May-24 17:35:31

Glorianny. and you clearly didn't understand my post. Nit picking is someone one not agreeing wth the artist's interpretation.

Glorianny Sun 19-May-24 11:11:54

M0nica

A portrait is the artist's take on the sitter. all the phrase Some of them get the horse wrong that's unforgivable. means is that the viewer does not agree with the artist's interpretation.

Oh for goodness sake. It's a joke. It's Alan Bennett. It's nothing to do with artist's interpretations. It's a suggestion that the late Queen bothered more about how the horse looked. It's funny.

Mollygo Sun 19-May-24 08:59:36

M0nica

A portrait is the artist's take on the sitter. all the phrase Some of them get the horse wrong that's unforgivable. means is that the viewer does not agree with the artist's interpretation.

👏👏👏

M0nica Sun 19-May-24 07:44:38

A portrait is the artist's take on the sitter. all the phrase Some of them get the horse wrong that's unforgivable. means is that the viewer does not agree with the artist's interpretation.

Glorianny Sat 18-May-24 20:52:27

Just been listening to Alan Bennett's A Question of Attribution. Brilliant discussion about the Queen having her portrait painted.
"One gets the impression that as artists portrait painters don't really count"
and
"Some of them get the horse wrong that's unforgivable."

Grantanow Sat 18-May-24 13:15:54

Bear in mind this was commissioned for Drapers Hall by the Drapers' livery company with which Charles has had a long association. It's not a Buck House, etc., painting. It is interesting because it keeps to the convention of presenting the King as a military officer while hinting at his concerns for the natural world.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 18-May-24 08:41:19

I suspect that the King had quite a say in the final outcome of the picture, and the message it is sending.

Just as other portraits of monarchs send messages - Elizabeth 1 hardly had one painted that didn’t include a message and Charles has had decades to think of the type of monarch he wishes to be seen as.

My guess is the message is both obvious and less so. The obvious is his love of the environment and all his long years of arguing for its protection - organic - etc.

The less obvious is I think that the message is for change and transition. From what - to - presumably will become obvious as the years go by - but it is interesting.

Emphasising head and hands is also an interesting idea.

Pantglas2 Sat 18-May-24 08:12:15

My sentiments too Monica! I’d be very interested to know what the king thinks of it too.

M0nica Sat 18-May-24 07:46:51

If people want a photographic likeness type portrait- well there are plenty of photographs available.

I think the physical portrait of the head is superb, one of the best I have seen, and it dominates the picture. The butterfly landing on his shoulder is a reference to the King's environmental concerns.

Neither age nor education has anything to do with whether someone can appreciate an item of artistic endeavour, and remarks about being a 'prole', whatever that might mean, are just affectations.

In this day of photography, the only point of a portrait like this, is for the artist to express or show something about the subject in the painting that cannot be seen in a photograph and this is what the artist has done so successfully.

Kamiso Fri 17-May-24 18:43:37

I didn’t realise how large it is.

Kamiso Fri 17-May-24 18:42:06

BigBertha1

I think I'm too much of a prole to appreciate it.

Same here! Can just about make out the uniform jacket seeing it for the second time. The face is good though.

Callistemon21 Fri 17-May-24 17:50:31

sluttygran

I don't like the painting.
I'm not terribly keen on the idea of Monarchy, either.
>> Runs and hides.

I'm not keen on the idea of a Presidential system.

But if it's what William wanted, I'd vote for it in a referendum. I do feel sorry for whoever has to face that burden.

VioletSky Fri 17-May-24 17:07:01

Is it treason if I laugh at this?

sluttygran Fri 17-May-24 17:00:58

I don't like the painting.
I'm not terribly keen on the idea of Monarchy, either.
>> Runs and hides.

Callistemon21 Fri 17-May-24 16:25:47

It's given me an idea for my next commission 😁

Glorianny Fri 17-May-24 16:22:25

Of course he may just have spent too long on the face and hands and realised he wouldn't finish on time if he did lots of detail.

Callistemon21 Fri 17-May-24 15:44:12

Mollygo

Good ideas Callistemon21 and Glorianny, but it’s really made some people see red!

😁

merlotgran Fri 17-May-24 14:42:32

Robin202

“The flip made me laugh. If you ever flip a photo of yourself you look different -but so what?”

Are you seeing what so many people are commenting on? It’s not his facial image, it’s the subliminal image joining the two together.

If you’re aware of the satanic cult with its rituals/symbolism/ceremonies that permeate so much of society - you will see why so many are interpreting this portrait in this way. It has nothing to do ‘with the lives they lead’ - it is an awareness of what actually exists in the world.

Maybe they just need to get a life? 🤔

Mollygo Fri 17-May-24 12:55:09

Good ideas Callistemon21 and Glorianny, but it’s really made some people see red!