Nicenanny3
Establishing safe and legal routes for refugees to settle in Britain will not deter those who are planning on crossing the Channel from doing so, and we know as much given that such routes already exist. Since 2015, the UK has resettled around half a million refugees into Britain using established safe and legal routes. These routes are intended to help those most at risk, and have therefore prioritised resettling those from areas of intense conflict such as Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Syria.
Yet despite the existence of these routes, irregular crossings across the Channel have consistently increased throughout this period, reaching almost 50,000 people in 2022 alone.”
(Migration Watch Website)
These figures are only boosted by the Ukraine and Afghanistan resettlement programme. Plus 44,659 others who were allowed to join family who were already here. There are no visas or safe routes for the majority who need asylum.
This is one of many articles about Migration Watch, who have their own agenda and produce highly inaccurate reports that help them spread false anti-immigration propaganda.
Ian Dunt, editor of Politics.co.uk, has launched a scathing attack on Migration Watch UK for falsifying the facts about UK immigration. It's no secret that Migration Watch, which describes itself as an independent, non-political think tank, is anti-immigration. Dunt describes how the group 'contorts the facts about immigrants and uses them as a weapon.
workpermit.com/news/migration-watch-uk-criticised-misleading-uk-immigration-reports-20160629


