Mollygo
Who said anything about means testing?
The decision about WFA was made by deciding who they think could afford to do without it and who they think needed it. We already know about those on the cusp.
The basic annual salary of a Member of Parliament (MP) in the House of Commons is £91,346, plus expenses, from April 2024.
Starmer is entitled to unlimited expenses for subsistence and travel.
The basic annual salary of a pensioner is nowhere near that.
This exchange, from your previous post in response to ^Wyllow3* was what I was referring to Mollygo?
‘But is it right that all MPs can claim the same level of expenses from the public purse, no matter how rich, or poor they are?
Surely that sort of unfairness is what the government are trying to put a stop to with scrapping the WFA for all but the poorest?’
Perhaps I misinterpreted.