Gransnet forums

News & politics

Should we really be doing this?

(136 Posts)
LR10 Fri 18-Oct-24 13:29:31

So Labour are sending 100 staff to swing states in the USA to canvass for Kamala Harris. How would we feel if the USA did that during our election campaign - I for one would be furious! Do other Gransnetters think it's OK to involve ourselves in another country's presidential election?

maddyfour Fri 18-Oct-24 17:06:53

I didn’t know about Liz Truss, but I did know about Farage (hard not to know.) Anyway I had no truck with that either, they shouldn’t be supporting Trump (for God’s sake, Trump!!!)

The thing with this is that it’s 100 people going, one of whom is an MP, a woman, but I’ve forgotten her name. Posters were quite rightly outraged about Farage going over to support Trump, particularly after he became an MP. I remember the questions, who was looking after constituents and doing his surgeries? Quite right to ask those questions. So the same applies to this female MP who has gone (or is going) now.

No serving MP should abandon their constituency to interfere in another country’s election. To put it bluntly, it’s not their business. Their constituency is their business. As for the other 99 people, presumably party members, they should not be going under the Labour Party banner simply because our government is Labour. It would be the same for any other government we had. Our government is supposed to be non partisan with regards to the governments of other countries, so that we can work with other countries diplomatically. Is this not impossible if our government has made clear that it is partisan?

Galaxy Fri 18-Oct-24 16:57:07

To be fair now I think about it wasnt Lammy involved in Obama's campaign, I may have imagined this, but it rings a bell.

Grandmabatty Fri 18-Oct-24 16:36:09

I wasn't happy with Liz Truss going to the republican rallies either, nor Farage supporting Trump. So I think it's morally dubious.

Casdon Fri 18-Oct-24 15:22:47

Galaxy

It's not about the rights of wrongs of the cause. If you approve of it you would have to be happy with for example the Tories going to support Trump.

Which of course they have already done. Who knows if high profile Tories speaking at the national Republican convention has more or less influence on voters than 100 foot soldiers? I don’t pretend to, I just wish they would all stop.

Galaxy Fri 18-Oct-24 15:11:14

It's not about the rights of wrongs of the cause. If you approve of it you would have to be happy with for example the Tories going to support Trump.

pascal30 Fri 18-Oct-24 15:08:41

Starmer is setting himself up for a big fall if Trump wins.. but I really support Kamala Harris so maybe it's worth it..

Fleurpepper Fri 18-Oct-24 15:03:10

Aveline

I'd go. No expenses required in such a good cause

Same here.

A huge difference with open canvassing and secret, underhand interfering (as from Russia and possibly Trump and others).

Cossy Fri 18-Oct-24 14:37:36

winterwhite

I think extraordinary and very wrong. Any chance the source has got hold of the wrong end of some stick?

Doesn’t look like it sadly! In Telegraph, Daily Mail and Express

Cossy Fri 18-Oct-24 14:37:02

mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/british-labour-party-sending-staff-to-campaign-for-harris-in-us-swing-states-united-kingdom-uk-left-leaning-kamala-harris-2024-election-democratic-party-north-carolina-pennsylvania

winterwhite Fri 18-Oct-24 14:32:38

I think extraordinary and very wrong. Any chance the source has got hold of the wrong end of some stick?

Cossy Fri 18-Oct-24 14:30:51

maddyfour

Iam64 obviously using funds from the Labour Party is a very different matter than using taxation. If the LP want to use funds that way, it’s up to them.

However, that still leaves the question of interference in elections in other countries. I’m no fan of Trump, absolutely 100% not, but given our own objections to foreign interference in our elections, it’s really not something we should be getting mixed up in, in my opinion. Leave other countries to sort out their own elections and do not interfere. That is my opinion.

I wholeheartedly agree

Cossy Fri 18-Oct-24 14:29:45

What?? I’ve heard nothing of this?

Oreo Fri 18-Oct-24 14:23:19

Aveline

I'd go. No expenses required in such a good cause

That’s fine as you’re a private citizen not a member of the LP and close to our government.
I think it’s shocking to interfere so publicly and it may well bite this govt on the bum if Harris doesn’t win.

Oreo Fri 18-Oct-24 14:20:25

maddyfour

Iam64 obviously using funds from the Labour Party is a very different matter than using taxation. If the LP want to use funds that way, it’s up to them.

However, that still leaves the question of interference in elections in other countries. I’m no fan of Trump, absolutely 100% not, but given our own objections to foreign interference in our elections, it’s really not something we should be getting mixed up in, in my opinion. Leave other countries to sort out their own elections and do not interfere. That is my opinion.

I totally agree and apart from anything else what if DT wins and he knows our present government actively campaigned against him?

sharon103 Fri 18-Oct-24 14:18:24

No I don't think it's ok.

Witzend Fri 18-Oct-24 14:13:13

If I found Americans canvassing for any political party before a general election of ours, I’d be livid. Let them stick to their own messy politics.
I seem to recall Barack Obama kindly telling us how we ought to vote in the Brexit referendum. IMO he should have minded his own business, too.

Casdon Fri 18-Oct-24 14:12:48

You posted that taxpayers money would be used, not the OP maddyfour, that’s why I asked you to share your source. That is not unreasonable, surely?

Aveline Fri 18-Oct-24 14:11:25

I'd go. No expenses required in such a good cause

maddyfour Fri 18-Oct-24 14:09:48

I agree GrannyGravy.
I would be absolutely fuming alongside you if Republican Loyalists (or Democrats) were to come to the UK and interfere in our elections.

Macadia Fri 18-Oct-24 14:07:43

That type of assistance in the US is not welcome and Harris should discourage it. She will be made a laughing stock about it. Never okay to jump in to a foreign nation's election. Have they gone bonkers? Terrible leadership on this one.

maddyfour Fri 18-Oct-24 14:07:31

Iam64 obviously using funds from the Labour Party is a very different matter than using taxation. If the LP want to use funds that way, it’s up to them.

However, that still leaves the question of interference in elections in other countries. I’m no fan of Trump, absolutely 100% not, but given our own objections to foreign interference in our elections, it’s really not something we should be getting mixed up in, in my opinion. Leave other countries to sort out their own elections and do not interfere. That is my opinion.

seadragon Fri 18-Oct-24 14:06:51

Well said, @Iam64....!

GrannyGravy13 Fri 18-Oct-24 14:06:18

Iam64

Well as a LP member, I’m happy for my subs to be used to support Kamala.
All that needs for evil to triumph is for good to stand by saying, nothing to do with me

I have just posted on another thread.

would you be happy if Republican loyalists were to come here and canvas/campaign for the Conservatives in the next U.K. GE. ?

I 100% would be fuming, no foreign help for elections no way Jose!

maddyfour Fri 18-Oct-24 14:02:37

I heard it, but you could ask the OP for a link if you’d like one Casdon. I’m not the OP.

I’m pleased you imagine that the Labour Party are funding it. Let’s hope you’re right!

Iam64 Fri 18-Oct-24 14:02:15

Well as a LP member, I’m happy for my subs to be used to support Kamala.
All that needs for evil to triumph is for good to stand by saying, nothing to do with me