This is an anecdotal example ...
Two years ago, I was diagnosed with breast cancer. Two lesions were discovered and the first consultant I saw said I would have to have a mastectomy. Obviously, I was upset but was consoled by the plan to have an implant at the same time as the op.
So I had an appointment with a plastic surgeon. She spent most of the appointment telling me that she had one of the lowest infection rates in the country. Unfortunately, I'm diabetic and diabetics have a high risk for infection and breast implant rejection, so she wasn't prepared to operate on me.
I was really upset because 'going flat' was a shock to me. I burst into tears and one of the breast care nurses suggested I see a different consultant. The second consultant was a specialist oncoplastic surgeon, who agreed to operate on me by giving me an extended lumpectomy, which has preserved my nipple and about two thirds of my breast. He then agreed to a second op which has reduced the size of my good breast, so both breast are more or less the same size and shape and I can wear a normal bra without an insert. I can also go swimming and my breast look the same.
If the breast care nurse hadn't understood that I was upset and hadn't suggested a change in surgeon, I would now be flat on one side and I'm pretty sure I'd be unhappy. That plastic surgeon wasn't prepared to take the risk because she wanted to preserve her good record. The second consultant was prepared to take a risk and I will forever be grateful to the nurse and to him.
My concern is that medics will opt for safe options, just so that their position in league tables looks good.
A drop in the ocean in the great schemes of things....but replicated by how many more


