Gransnet forums

News & politics

How could we have let Sara down so badly?

(494 Posts)
petal53 Wed 11-Dec-24 16:48:49

I heard on the news this afternoon, and read in the DM about the guilty verdicts in the case of the little girl, Sara Sharif. Reading the details about her treatment, right from birth, brought tears to my eyes. The police, her school, Social Services, and the judiciary all let this child down so badly, it’s scarcely believable. I speak as an ex teacher. This child was at risk from day one, and spent several years in foster care. The school failed to report more than once. Social Services were involved throughout her ten years of life, but frequently failed her during those years. I haven’t got words for the Family Court judge who placed her back with her abusive father. They all knew he was violent and abusive towards women and children, and yet she was placed in his care and left in his care.

We’re all currently appalled at what has been happening in Syria’s prisons, and yet this child was subjected to sickening abuse here in England. The same kind of abuse those prisoners were subjected to. Beaton with a metal pole and a cricket bat, plastic bags tied around her face, bitten, burnt with a hot iron. It’s absolutely heartbreaking. Her father and step mother are guilty, and her uncle guilty of allowing it to happen, but a lot of other people are guilty too. Guilty of failing this beautiful child. I hope they’re all ashamed of the part they played in the events that caused her suffering and eventually her death.

Cupseamer Fri 13-Dec-24 18:43:32

She's not the first bless her little heart and sadly she won't be the last. How many are going through it right now and nothing ever changes. This country is a joke but not funny. At least she and all the others are at peace and out of danger. Absolutely heartbreaking

Iam64 Fri 13-Dec-24 18:43:04

Children are still given regular checks at 8 months, 2 years or at least my grandchildren have.
My impression is like every other service, health visitors are over worked.
We can’t afford not to invest in Early Years and safeguarding throughout childhood

petal53 Fri 13-Dec-24 18:42:50

I’ve just turned on the ITV news and immediately there was a report on two year old Isabella, murdered by her mother’s boyfriend, after a campaign of violence and abuse. The injury that finally killed her was a shattered pelvis! He has been jailed for a minimum of 26 years, and her mother, convicted of causing or allowing her death, for ten years.

It goes on.

Skydancer Fri 13-Dec-24 18:31:51

Yes, Ilovecheese. I remember the health visitors who I found very helpful.

Ilovecheese Fri 13-Dec-24 18:29:14

Skydancer

Sorry…I typed something and it disappeared!
What I was saying is that as far as I know there are no checks at all on pre-school children who do not attend nursery. It’s ridiculous.

They used to have health visitors.

Skydancer Fri 13-Dec-24 18:16:20

Sorry…I typed something and it disappeared!
What I was saying is that as far as I know there are no checks at all on pre-school children who do not attend nursery. It’s ridiculous.

Iam64 Fri 13-Dec-24 18:08:23

growstuff

It's not about a fear of being accused of racism. It's about not always listening to minorities - which is racism.

Thank you growstuff.

Allira Fri 13-Dec-24 17:59:18

The worrying aspect of this and other cases seems to be that children aren't listened to or even seen in some cases.

Because a house is immaculately tidy downstairs doesn't mean that horrific abuse is not happening upstairs.

growstuff Fri 13-Dec-24 17:57:22

It's not about a fear of being accused of racism. It's about not always listening to minorities - which is racism.

growstuff Fri 13-Dec-24 17:55:54

petra

Allira

Iam64

The comments from some posters that suggest faith or ethnicity issues prevented social workers from taking effective action hold more than a hint of racism.

No, posters are asking if that might have been the case.

The question is one which should not be avoided by the authorities as we have seen in previous cases.

There was avery interesting piece on Woman’s Hour this morning. Anita Rani asked a professional in this field if this was a problem. The woman didn’t miss a beat answering ^yes, absolutely^

That wasn't the question which was asked. As Jeanathome has mentioned, it was about whether children from minorities are listened to.

Posters on GN were doing more than asking - they were speculating for no good reason (which doesn't surprise me).

Allira Fri 13-Dec-24 17:42:16

petra

Allira

Iam64

The comments from some posters that suggest faith or ethnicity issues prevented social workers from taking effective action hold more than a hint of racism.

No, posters are asking if that might have been the case.

The question is one which should not be avoided by the authorities as we have seen in previous cases.

There was avery interesting piece on Woman’s Hour this morning. Anita Rani asked a professional in this field if this was a problem. The woman didn’t miss a beat answering ^yes, absolutely^

Interesting, petra. I'm glad the question was asked and answered on air.

Neither prejudice nor fear of being accused of racism should be allowed to hinder such investigations.

Jeanathome Fri 13-Dec-24 17:36:58

petra

Allira

Iam64

The comments from some posters that suggest faith or ethnicity issues prevented social workers from taking effective action hold more than a hint of racism.

No, posters are asking if that might have been the case.

The question is one which should not be avoided by the authorities as we have seen in previous cases.

There was avery interesting piece on Woman’s Hour this morning. Anita Rani asked a professional in this field if this was a problem. The woman didn’t miss a beat answering ^yes, absolutely^

Professor Aisha Gill on Women's Hour refered to the systemic failure to respond to the voices of minoritized children.
Is that what you mean?

eazybee Fri 13-Dec-24 17:29:45

There are two issues being discussed here: home-schooling and the responsibility for Sara Sharif’s death.
Home-schooling needs to be closely monitored for all children, not just those believed to be at risk. The idea that any parent can effectively home-school a child is flawed, witness covid. Some children flourish because most of their tutoring is one-to one and they receive all the attention they crave. But many are let down by this system and reach working age with an inadequate knowledge and poor preparation for the outside world.
These children are failed in their preparation for life just as surely as the victims of abuse.

The case of Sara Sharif has provoked national outrage. It is not a political construct by newspapers apparently intent on demonising 'liberal social workers.' Pretending that this is a case which has been stirred up by a newspaper is unjust, as are the allegations that this is an excuse for an attack on understaffed, over-stressed people.
Sara was failed by the Judge and the social workers who deemed her father a suitable person to take parental responsibility, despite their knowledge of his previous violence against women and children. She was failed by her Headteacher, whose duty in safeguarding it was to report suspicions of child abuse, and who failed to question the conclusions of the social services team (another failure) or raise concerns when she was removed from the school, and from potential monitoring.

This is not a political bandwagon. The actions of the experienced professionals involved in Sara’s care are difficult to justify. Unless the whole episode is scrupulously examined, including the cultural influences at work, and the findings are publicised, this tragedy will be repeated again and again.

petra Fri 13-Dec-24 17:01:57

Allira

Iam64

The comments from some posters that suggest faith or ethnicity issues prevented social workers from taking effective action hold more than a hint of racism.

No, posters are asking if that might have been the case.

The question is one which should not be avoided by the authorities as we have seen in previous cases.

There was avery interesting piece on Woman’s Hour this morning. Anita Rani asked a professional in this field if this was a problem. The woman didn’t miss a beat answering yes, absolutely

Freshair Fri 13-Dec-24 15:54:32

Poor Sara. She learned to put a smile on her face and pretend to her teachers that nothing out if the ordinary was happening. Like so many victims and despite her tender age, she became an expert at coping with her trauma. My heart bleeds for all the Sara's just existing with families who torture them.

Maremia Fri 13-Dec-24 15:28:24

There are so many expressions of justifiable angst on this thead. What can we do to resolve the issue? A massive task. I have never been a Social Worker, but I do have some insight into how Education works. Regular inspections by HMIE attempt to maintain standards.
So start with the regulation that no-one be allowed to home school unless they fulfil certain criteria, and that list is composed by HMIE, and covers some of the same issues that are looked at during a school inspection. For example, how suitable is the venue/ room/ table/desk for education purposes? Show evidence of your forward planning, show evidence of the materials you will use, show evidence of your suitability to educate. HMIE do not accept statements that are not backed up by EVIDENCE. And they have the professional standing and capacity to ask searching questions. It should become part of their responsibility and remit to vet applications for home schooling. And then they actually visit the home.
It removes the responsibility from harrassed head teachers and overworked social workers.
Although this suggestion is do-able, and resolves some of the issues, more is needed.
I hand over to those with Social Work and/or Policing and/or Fostering experience to add their valuable suggestions.

Wyllow3 Fri 13-Dec-24 14:28:35

I think the press space would be far better used to try and point out just how stressed/underfunded the systems are and how they might be improved, this would better served those they try to help.

Wyllow3 Fri 13-Dec-24 14:26:08

Yet another way to have a go at the understaffed, stressed, people working in education, SSD, and to some extent police.

Wyllow3 Fri 13-Dec-24 14:22:51

It's the Daily Telegraph today promoted this idea about "liberal social workers" and Sara Shariff as mentioned/quoted upthread. Political bandwagon.

I have seen no evidence or basis for this claim except surmise, judging by comparable problems also mentioned upthread with many other children.

Allira Fri 13-Dec-24 14:14:01

Harris27

I work in early years retiring in a year. How this wasn’t noticed at school and how all of the services never got contacted is beyond me. You know how a child is dirty quiet withdrawn the list goes on. Surely someone should have noticed.

Sara was not quiet or withdrawn at school. Her teachers said she was a bubbly and bright child who loved singing and dancing.
When bruises were noticed she gave answers such as having an accident etc, as she had, one would assume, been instructed by her parent.

I posted earlier that it amazes me that children who are being physically abused are often smiling.

Allira Fri 13-Dec-24 14:09:58

Anniebach

Not racism, fear

Fear of appearing racist.

Allira Fri 13-Dec-24 14:08:20

Iam64

The comments from some posters that suggest faith or ethnicity issues prevented social workers from taking effective action hold more than a hint of racism.

No, posters are asking if that might have been the case.

The question is one which should not be avoided by the authorities as we have seen in previous cases.

Wyllow3 Fri 13-Dec-24 13:41:34

sorry for misread, no I don't understand it.

petra Fri 13-Dec-24 13:13:24

Willow3
I worded my post in the wrong way.
For a name to be redacted the request comes from the named person. There has been no request from the judge.
So who has redacted the name?

Stillcrazy Fri 13-Dec-24 13:10:47

I’ll just start by saying that I do believe there are some good social workers out there and that it is a very difficult job.
However, in my past job as. Teacher and SENCO I attended a number of meetings with SS when children were judged to be “at risk.”
In my experience, very few people were willing to make the decision to remove a child from his/ her family home. Individuals had to refer to line managers who weren’t at the meetings, follow up phone calls and information received by the school were inadequate to say the least. I really hope this part of the system is better than it was back then.