M0nica
In most democracies, the young tend to vote less.
Sophie Hale, Principal Economist at the Resolution Foundation, said:
“The Conservatives have increasingly become the party of the old rather than the rich, while Labour have become the party of the young, rather than the poor.
“But a new age divide is emerging in Britain. Young non-graduates and non-homeowners, who tend to be poorer than the average millennial, are bucking the national swing towards Labour and are instead less likely to vote at all.
“The continuing fall in turnout among less well-off millennials is worrying because not voting in elections can become readily embedded in people’s behaviour. It also risks causing further neglect of their needs, as politicians focus their efforts on those who do turn out to vote.”
That last sentence - politicians focusing their efforts on those who are likely to vote; doesn't this mean that 'one-nation' type political thinking is or would be more effective than ostensibly single-issue, 'populist' politics?
Immigration, whether via regular channels or small boats, is important, but while all parties are being forced to focus on it - does it matter as much to young graduates (for example) unable to find work, or those entering the job-market for the first time only to discover that their paltry wages won't allow them to afford the high rents being charged?
So young people are doubly disadvantaging themselves by not voting.