I honestly cant understand that Les1950, it's not a result of the Green Paper (or for that matter the Labour Party) since none of the measures to come in the future have been put into affect at all - the old rules still apply.
I think you need to reach out for help and guidance very quickly
all the very best.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
*The Welfare Benefit changes*
(80 Posts)This summary is drawn from the BBC timeline so it as best laid out as possible:
Universal credit
* There will be permanent above-inflation rises to universal credit
* Universal credit claimants with severe, lifelong disabilities will not usually face benefits reassessments
* The work capability assessment for universal credit is to be scrapped in 2028 - the assessment essentially determines whether someone is able to work
Right to try
* People will have the right to try returning to work "without the fear this will put their benefits at risk". Kendall says this will tackle the "perverse financial incentives... which actively encourage people into welfare dependency"
Personal independence payments
* People will need to score a minimum of four points in one category to qualify for the daily living element of Pip, which is the main disability benefit. This won’t affect the mobility component of Pip.
Merging benefits
* The government will consult on merging jobseeker's allowance and employment support allowance into a time-limited "unemployment insurance"
* "If you have paid into the system, you'll get stronger income protection while we help you get back on track," Kendall says
Support to get back to work
* Am is to deliver personalised support to sick and disabled people who can work to get the jobs they "need and deserve".
This Labour government believes that an active state can transform people's lives," she says, announcing an additional £1bn a year for employment support
Alongside this, for those on the universal credit health top-up they will bring in an "expectation to engage" alongside an offer of personalised employment support, she says.
Under 22’s limitations
*Probably the most significant announcement that was not trailed in advance was Kendall’s announcement that those aged under 22 will no longer be able to claim the incapacity benefit top up to universal credit.
That appears designed to disrupt the flow of young people from school straight onto health benefits – one of the issues which has most alarmed ministers.
Generally
: Kendall says she wants to ensure that those on universal credit with the “most severe disabilities and health conditions that will never improve” won’t be reassessed “to give them the confidence and dignity they deserve”.
She says the government will “fundamentally overhaul” the DWP safeguarding approach to protect and support the most vulnerable
Les1950
My son's pip is being reduced, even though he is terminally ill. How is thst right? What about taxing the millionaires( some of them have even offered to pay more) ? What happened to labour, no better than the other lot. ( but they are all wealthy too)
I’m not really understanding why your son’s PIP is being reduced? It cannot be any LP policy changes, their proposed changes don’t take effect until April 2026.
I’m so sorry about your son.
I can only suggest you call PIP directly.
My son's pip is being reduced, even though he is terminally ill. How is thst right? What about taxing the millionaires( some of them have even offered to pay more) ? What happened to labour, no better than the other lot. ( but they are all wealthy too)
#Wyllow3 Thanks for the extra info. I just hope he gets the help he needs.
stewaris
My son has long covid and the scrapping of the capability assessment will affect him. He had it right at the start of the pandemic and, as there were no tests at that time, he has been refused PIP. Covid affected his brain, heart, lungs, liver and stomach. There was a time round about week 5/6 I thought he would die. His GP, who worked in the covid ward at the local hospital, said he was 100% sure that he'd had covid. He was really fit prior to covid and carried out a heavy manual job but he is a shadow of the man he used to be. God knows what this means for him.
Although in the first paragraph in the summary of Universal Credit in the O/P it does say that work capability assessments will be scrapped....
Its actually ambiguous in the detailed green paper -
It doesn't say people will be refused basic Universal Credit - but appears to relate to who makes assessments for getting it/getting more as in here
"Scrapping the WCA to end the labelling of people as either ‘can or can’t work’ and consulting on a new single assessment. Under the new system, any extra financial support for health conditions (including PIP, ESA or UC health) will be assessed via a new single assessment which will be based on the PIP assessment – considering on the impact of disability on daily living, not on capacity to work.
Increasing Face-to-Face Assessments for PIP and the WCA to improve the quality of assessment decision
while ensuring we continue to meet the needs of those with who may require a different method of assessment."
In this paper
www.gov.uk/government/news/biggest-shake-up-to-welfare-system-in-a-generation-to-get-britain-working#:~:text=Under%20the%20new%20system%2C%20any,not%20on%20capacity%20to%20work.
Please don't assume your son will get help until getting more information. I'm sorry its so distressing.x
Wyllow3
I agree growstuff that is indeed the best way forward. But it won't save money and in the situation we are in these supportive jobs would need to be around a substantial time. (I dont have an easy answer to this)
I don't really have an idea how many jobs are around GANNET that fit the bill as suitable for who is employed. Perhaps someone else has more idea.
The jobs I wrote about before (at Enterprise East and my friend's allotment/market garden) are new jobs and are sustainable in the long term. There are others.
Is everyone here aware that Barclays, HSBC are two of 4 banks that own the Motobility scheme and that 1 in 5 new cars bought are bought by this scheme?
It must be a nice little earner otherwise the above wouldn’t be involved.
I do agree if one can work one should.
But for those who are on the border line I feel sorry for as what job they could do wouldn’t pay much. However, we must be handing out too much as the Uk pays out the most compared to the other European countries
My daughter-in-law who comes from Tanzania was so surprised when she first found that one can get benefits which doesn’t happen in Africa.
wibblywobblywobblebo
ttom None of it affects me.
And! 🤷♀️
Posted too early Meant to add that not all people on incapacity are workshy.
My son has long covid and the scrapping of the capability assessment will affect him. He had it right at the start of the pandemic and, as there were no tests at that time, he has been refused PIP. Covid affected his brain, heart, lungs, liver and stomach. There was a time round about week 5/6 I thought he would die. His GP, who worked in the covid ward at the local hospital, said he was 100% sure that he'd had covid. He was really fit prior to covid and carried out a heavy manual job but he is a shadow of the man he used to be. God knows what this means for him.
I agree growstuff that is indeed the best way forward. But it won't save money and in the situation we are in these supportive jobs would need to be around a substantial time. (I dont have an easy answer to this)
I don't really have an idea how many jobs are around GANNET that fit the bill as suitable for who is employed. Perhaps someone else has more idea.
GANNET
What jobs? What employment? I think a review is definitely needed as the bill is rocketing but there doesn’t seem to be any thought given to the scarcity of jobs/training available.
That's why part of the package needs to be creation of jobs and training opportunities. In the short term, at least, it won't save money.
What jobs? What employment? I think a review is definitely needed as the bill is rocketing but there doesn’t seem to be any thought given to the scarcity of jobs/training available.
Tut tut? If you know someone is committing benefits fraud it’s your moral duty to report them. I assume you would just turn a blind eye?
Barleyfields
As it’s only a Green Paper we don’t know what the changes will be after the consultation, how much the proposals will be watered down, nor when any changes will come into effect. Having known (and successfully reported) a benefits fraudster I would like to see more energy directed towards weeding them out in addition to serious cutbacks. How do you help someone into work who doesn’t want to work? Will benefits be withdrawn?
Tut, tut Barleyfields.
I remember Remploy. I had a friend who was had MH issues and was taking largacatil but she worked there full time and seemed to enjoy it. This was in the early 1980's.
On C4 News last night they interviewed a man who hadn't worked for the past 10 years due to depression. To me if someone has severe depression they can't get out of bed in the morning/self harming or suicide attempts, then they can't possibly work but this chap seemed relatively cheerful was out and about etc. Obviously you can't judge from a 5 minute interview.
There was an interesting item on R4 today "Age of Diagnosis" by a consultant in neurology. Basically she was saying that autism is being over diagnosed to the detriment of individuals with severe autism who are now waiting longer and longer for treatment due to increased waiting lists. She described a child who is non verbal, rocks constantly or flaps his hands, has violent episodes and other symptoms- that is autism Mild autism is diagnosed as
"People with mild autism may have relatively mild impairments in social communication and interaction, as well as restricted and repetitive behaviors. While they may face challenges in certain areas, they can also possess strengths and abilities that contribute to their overall development and well-being."
I know two individuals who have received diagnosis. They function normally and are not impaired neurogically, however they have a few issues such as anger management, anxiety or difficulties making friends. So now they have been formally diagnosed. Their parent said they didn't think they would ever hold down a job.
I believe these issues are mainly due to being over indulged and always allowed their own way as children.
I suffered severe anxiety during most of my working career and I received medication for it. I knew that if I did not work we would probably lose our home so I continued to work throughout a dark period.
How smug. One day it might affect you. Things can change in an instant.
None of it affects me.
Indeed Jockytaff. I'm not in touch with how the system works these days, but it used to be that people receiving contributory Unemployment Benefit (before UC) weren't means-tested for three months, but they were eligible for less support thanthose receiving non-contributory UB. As a result, those whose contributions were up-to-date received less than those who had never contributed, which seemed nuts to me.
Wyllow3 - re Kendall's proposal about helping people who will receive extra protection who have paid into the system - we had this pre Thatcher whereby Unemployment Benefit & Sickness Benefit, as it was then, was calculated on your previous NI contributions - a fair system I would say-but the Tories scrapped it soon after winning the '79 election meaning that someone unfortunate enough to become unemployed or incapacitated received the same as someone who had never bothered working.
sparkynan
I’m like to see the government investing some of these billions!! In setting up the old style remploy factory’s and produce equipment that the NHS, Education, Councils and Government departments use instead of importing it from China etc. anyone applying for unemployment benefits would only get money if they go to work in these factories! Would that not make sense?
I couldn't agree more about Remploy. It was a tragic mistake when they were closed down. Nevertheless, there are some similar organisations springing up. This is one:
www.enterpriseeast.org/
The above is for people with learning difficulties, but it wouldn't be rocket science to set something up for different audiences.
A friend of mine runs an allotment/market garden specifically for people with social difficulties. Many of the people who work there are former drug addicts and alcoholics or ex-prisoners.
I think there have always been small-scale operations, so it needs co-ordination with others such as the JobCentres.
It's probably naive to think that current employers can take these people on, so jobs and training opportunities need to be created.
yellowfox
The sooner they sort out the maalingerers the better. The welfare state has for too long been supporting some people who do not want to work.They know how to manipulate the system
People who genuinely need help should still be entitled to tjeir benefits.
Lets hopwe the government get it right but I don't have a lot of faith.
I do agree, but as you say government bureaucracy often fails people.This all has to be done right.
It would definitely make sense to have schemes that offer supported return to work with support type employment. there used to be community work schemes iirc.
They are very expensive however - at the moment it's clearly felt that individual support for work (which does currently sometimes include groups) is the viable option.
I’m like to see the government investing some of these billions!! In setting up the old style remploy factory’s and produce equipment that the NHS, Education, Councils and Government departments use instead of importing it from China etc. anyone applying for unemployment benefits would only get money if they go to work in these factories! Would that not make sense?
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

