Gransnet forums

News & politics

Plan B: Building a trading network rather than retaliating against Trump?

(199 Posts)
PoliticsNerd Tue 08-Apr-25 00:11:28

Starmer, Macron, Carney and others are already talking to one another as we have seen. Several sources are suggesting that they may also be discussing an alliance of countries committed to the rules based system.

The combined economies of Canada, the UK, Australia Japan and the EU are slightly greater than the American economy. They all also have quite large volumes of trade with America too. Banding together could give them far greater strength. These countries are already used to co-operating with one another. It could also easily be expanded to included others.

This would not be a free trade area, just about keeping trade barriers between the interested parties as low as possible to cut America out where they can.

I thought it worth having a separate thread for this, following any developments on this topic.

Wyllow3 Fri 11-Apr-25 11:31:18

Good article.

particularly thought this relevant

"The trouble is that if companies are really to be persuaded to reshore manufacturing jobs to America, then America’s tariffs will need to stay high.
But if they stay high, what incentive do trading partners have to give huge concessions? Mr Trump’s muddled convictions, and the contradictions they contain, will hang over all the many bilateral negotiations his team is about to start"

David49 Fri 11-Apr-25 12:06:19

Casdon

David49

Our imports come from diverse sources, we buy from the most economic supplier, that hasn’t changed, Trump hasnt affected our trade with third countries (yet)

We buy much of our raw materials based on historic trade links David49, best price has not been the only consideration. I don’t understand why you seem to oppose democratic countries working together in a new bloc to get the best deal for us all, and trading collaboratively. We can’t allow USA to dictate. I wish we weren’t where we are, but we have to find new ways.

I don’t think there is any problem with a trade partnership, the EU is 26 countries cooperating with agreed terms, the UK needs to get closer to them. There not as many historic links as there used to be many Commonwealth countries have found other markets.
When new tariffs are announced we can then remodel our economy accordingly until then is speculation.

Whitewavemark2 Fri 11-Apr-25 13:15:42

I trust that we arent all hanging around waiting for Trump to tell us what the tariffs will be etc.

That would indeed be foolish.

We need to take charge of our own destiny. Europe is strong, stable and law abiding.

That is the way to go.

Elegran Fri 11-Apr-25 13:25:21

Yes, we can't completely remodel our economy every time Trump has a hissy fit over something. He is not the pivot point of every decision on the entire globe, much as he would like to think so.

Wyllow3 Fri 11-Apr-25 13:26:42

Difficult one, do we wait to see what happens to China?
I'm thinking particularly of computer parts and computers currently going to the USA

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Fri 11-Apr-25 13:33:12

I hear China has said it won't raise their latest US Tarrif rate any higher, so I'm guessing they have something else tucked up their silky sleeves? It could be China owning $800bn of American Bonds they can dump at any time. Maybe?

Whitewavemark2 Fri 11-Apr-25 14:19:31

Looks as if we are going to nationalise British Steel. No surprise.

Now nationalise water😡☹️😡

Wyllow3 Fri 11-Apr-25 14:34:30

Whitewavemark2

Looks as if we are going to nationalise British Steel. No surprise.

Now nationalise water😡☹️😡

Good.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Fri 11-Apr-25 15:17:10

Spain’s prime minister has called for Europe to forge closer ties with Beijing during Donald Trump’s assault on global trade.

Speaking after a meeting with Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, in Beijing on Friday, Pedro Sanchez said: “Spain sees China as a partner of the EU.”

Oh no!

I’m glad we’re not part of the EU Sanchez!

fancythat Fri 11-Apr-25 15:19:10

I have seen that there could be moves afoot to change the dominance of the dollar in world trade

That has been tried multiple tomes in the past, has it not?
I could be wrong.

I never consider the EU as stable.
Too many changes of leadership with all the multip[le countries. For starters.

PoliticsNerd Fri 11-Apr-25 15:26:16

Whitewavemark2

Looks as if we are going to nationalise British Steel. No surprise.

Now nationalise water😡☹️😡

Where did you here that Whitewave? I've not been keen on nationalisation in the past but it may the only way. I just hope any new model ensures no group gets too much power, that conflict is minimised, that all workers are considered with no authoritarianism from the unions.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Fri 11-Apr-25 15:26:28

Whitewavemark2

Looks as if we are going to nationalise British Steel. No surprise.

Now nationalise water😡☹️😡

Good.
The Commons will sit tomorrow amid fears the Scunthorpe plant could close within days.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Fri 11-Apr-25 15:30:01

Better keep the coal mines, oil rigs and gas pipes open too.
The folly of ‘Net Stupid’ is about to unravel.

PoliticsNerd Fri 11-Apr-25 15:30:48

Another informed view: www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIxveZB5tdU

Casdon Fri 11-Apr-25 15:31:13

Do you agree with nationalisation FriedGreenTomatoes2, isn’t that the route to more state intervention, which is the opposite to what Trump espouses?

PoliticsNerd Fri 11-Apr-25 15:31:58

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Better keep the coal mines, oil rigs and gas pipes open too.
The folly of ‘Net Stupid’ is about to unravel.

What does that even mean and what knowledge is it based on?

David49 Fri 11-Apr-25 15:38:36

PoliticsNerd

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Better keep the coal mines, oil rigs and gas pipes open too.
The folly of ‘Net Stupid’ is about to unravel.

What does that even mean and what knowledge is it based on?

Just a guess

It’s the drive to Net Zero that’s keeping fuel prices high making steel making in the UK uneconomic.

50 yrs ago we mined our own coal and iron ore, I remember the iron ore trains going down to South Wales. Thatcher changed all that and it’s reduced year by year ever since.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Fri 11-Apr-25 15:39:57

I’m not a fan of nationalism really. I don’t think governments (all stripes) are any good at running anything. I think the old BT put me off. (Party line anyone while you wait for a landline?).

Choice is better.

But things re steel have come to this point. Worryingly so.

suelld Fri 11-Apr-25 15:41:52

J52

DH and I were discussing a move such as this, over the weekend. I can’t really see a different option while the US have such a volatile person as President.

‘ Volatile’ is a very mild word to use for that narcissistic, immoral Ego Blob!

MayBee70 Fri 11-Apr-25 15:42:49

We were in a very good trading network. It was called the EU. Obama warned us that we couldn’t depend on America for trade but people sneered at him, a foreigner telling what to do.

PoliticsNerd Fri 11-Apr-25 15:45:43

David49

PoliticsNerd

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Better keep the coal mines, oil rigs and gas pipes open too.
The folly of ‘Net Stupid’ is about to unravel.

What does that even mean and what knowledge is it based on?

Just a guess

It’s the drive to Net Zero that’s keeping fuel prices high making steel making in the UK uneconomic.

50 yrs ago we mined our own coal and iron ore, I remember the iron ore trains going down to South Wales. Thatcher changed all that and it’s reduced year by year ever since.

Thank you!

PoliticsNerd Fri 11-Apr-25 15:49:06

MayBee70

We were in a very good trading network. It was called the EU. Obama warned us that we couldn’t depend on America for trade but people sneered at him, a foreigner telling what to do.

MayBee70 I think you might find the link I posted in my 15:30:48 post interesting.

Arto1s Fri 11-Apr-25 17:42:06

So true Monica

fancythat Fri 11-Apr-25 18:42:26

Net Zero can take a running jump as far as I am concerned.
Even if there was a climate "problem"[doubt it personally], the pain is worse than the so called cure.

David49 Fri 11-Apr-25 20:50:46

fancythat

Net Zero can take a running jump as far as I am concerned.
Even if there was a climate "problem"[doubt it personally], the pain is worse than the so called cure.

The UK may well achieve Net Zero but only by importing goods and exporting pollution. Most of the nations we import from use coal to fuel their factories, China, Korea, India, Germany, US.

Global CO2 is still rising, whatever we do is cancelled out by our imports.