MayBee70
Anniebach
The poster I replied to said ‘there was nothing special about
the tree other than its age and where it grew’,
So chop down trees, pick flowers , ride motorbikes and quad
bikes through our national parks, all can be replaced
What I meant was that it hadn’t been presented to the country by the King of Persia or planted by Queen Victoria. Of course it was special in it’s own way because it was a living thing of great age. And I cried when I heard of it’s destruction so don’t accuse me of not caring for it. I just think that planting another tree in its place would cheer people up. But feel free to misinterpret my motivation for saying what I did
.
It doesn't matter whether the tree had any specific associations and was formally planted. By pure luck it germinated and grew where it did neatly in the centre of that fold of the hills and would have become iconic whether it was planted by Queen Victoria or the Queen of Sheba.
People noticed it and its perfect setting, photographed it, proposed marriages, had picnics, it was known and recognised world wide - like Stonehenge.
Yes, another tree could be planted, but it will be 100 years or more before it will bear comparison with the tree that was deliberately cut down. In the meanwhile generations will see the original tree only in photos and it will always be remembered for the ugly deed and the ugly people who cut it down, rather than the happiness its presence borught so many people.