Putting 'suspects' in chains in this day and age - seriously? Regardless of colour or nationality, or 'document' status.
I can appreciate that if you might be dealing with a suspected terrorist or violent criminal, there could be a good reason to do this; but as a general principle, I think it's brutish.
According to factually on the 'net, who harvest their information from various sources (but I haven't had time to check these out) - more than half of those detained had no criminal record.
... factually admits there are 'competing narratives' and 'biases' to consider, such as...
"Law enforcement agencies benefit from portraying all detainees as potential threats, as evidenced by DHS's stance."
"Immigration advocacy groups benefit from highlighting non-criminal deportations to demonstrate systemic overreach."
"Political actors can use either narrative to support their immigration policy positions."
Being undocumented is a civil penalty, not a federal crime.
- but
"ICE's public statements about focusing on criminals contradict their actual practices"
- and
"The Department of Homeland Security's stance that immigrants without criminal records are "far from innocent," despite providing no supporting evidence"
I realise there are ^opportunists' and would-be anarchists etc who exploit protests / demonstrations, but apart from them, maybe the level of anger is in direct proportion to the level of overreach by law enforcement?