Gransnet forums

News & politics

‘Oh Jeremy Corbyn’ đŸŽ” đŸŽ¶ and Zarah Sultana have confirmed the launch of their new political party today!

(158 Posts)
FriedGreenTomatoes2 Thu 24-Jul-25 13:45:32

It’s up and running today. The name of the new party hasn’t been announced yet.

This just now in the Telegraph:

“The former Labour leader and his fellow now-independent MP said it was “time for a new kind of political party” in a statement today.

The pair have invited voters to sign up to the Left-wing faction via the website yourparty.uk, although The Telegraph understands the new project will not be called Your Party and that its name is to be confirmed.

It comes after Mr Corbyn told activists that the new movement would be established in time to fight Labour nationwide at the local elections in May next year.

In a joint statement, Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana said: “It’s time for a new political party. One that belongs to you. The system is rigged.”

Well well.
It will split the Labour vote for sure. Starmer won’t be happy.

Maremia Mon 28-Jul-25 18:20:03

Just as a matter of interest, MOnica, does anyone know what he does to make himself so popular in his own constituency?
I realise his policies in the wider world are not popular.

M0nica Mon 28-Jul-25 16:22:56

Casdon

I think Corbyn personally will get votes M0nica, he is very popular in his constituency - if he genuinely wants to carry on as an MP by 2029, by which time he will be in his eighties (although, to be fair he is wearing well). I don’t think the other MPs in his party, who are a ragbag of the zealots and/or disaffected will fare so well.

I agree. He has a strong personal vote in his constituency, but apart from the very strange bunch of followers he has. I think his policies, at least, as many I have read, will stop most people voting for him.

Casdon Mon 28-Jul-25 16:09:10

I think Corbyn personally will get votes M0nica, he is very popular in his constituency - if he genuinely wants to carry on as an MP by 2029, by which time he will be in his eighties (although, to be fair he is wearing well). I don’t think the other MPs in his party, who are a ragbag of the zealots and/or disaffected will fare so well.

M0nica Mon 28-Jul-25 14:45:37

I doubt Corbyns will get many votes. Everyone has seen how incompetent he was as a party leader. No one in their right mind would want him as Prime Minister, whatever his policies. He is a busted flush.

nightowl Mon 28-Jul-25 12:51:38

I don’t think he’s ’letting Reform in’ Grantanow. He’s standing up for what he believes in after the party he was loyal to for 60 years threw him out. There were enough people within Labour urging him to start his own party, well now he has. The current Labour Party has to work out how to appeal to the electorate on its own merits now it’s expelled those pesky extremists who they felt were holding them back.

Grantanow Mon 28-Jul-25 11:54:43

nightowl

Grantanow

Personally competent or not, Corbyn's new party will split the Labour vote and let Farage's party in. A disaster for which Corbyn will be responsible.

Perhaps Keir Starmer would have been wiser to keep Jeremy Corbyn in the party and lead a Labour Party that truly was a ‘broad church’. If anyone has split the Labour vote it is Starmer himself.

As Tony Benn said ‘the Labour Party has never been a socialist party, but it’s always had socialists in it’. There is strength in a range of views. Perhaps Starmer just hasn’t been in politics long enough to learn from the past.

No point in talking about the past. If Corbyn persists with his new unnamed party he will let Reform in, A worse disaster for the UK than Brexit has been.

M0nica Sun 27-Jul-25 21:21:17

Sorry I was not clear, I was not talkingof Starmer talking to Corbyn, but identifying Corbyn and his supporters as extreme left wing. A left wing that actually got their leader elected as leader oft he Labour party, and reduced the wider party ito such a state of panic that it chose as its next leader from the bland uncharismatic wing of the party.

Keir Starmer may well have been DPP, and a successful one, by all accounts. However it does not follow that he will then be a good political leader at hasn't.

There is something called the Peter Principle that states that people in a hierarchy tend to rise to "a level of respective incompetence": employees are promoted based on their success in previous jobs until they reach a level at which they are no longer competent, as skills in one job do not necessarily translate to another. This is exactly what has happened to Kier Starmer.

MaizieD Sun 27-Jul-25 19:25:37

I'm slightly puzzled by MOnica's response, too... grin

Ilovecheese Sun 27-Jul-25 19:14:34

The only talking that Starmer has done to supporters of the policies of Corbyn, is to tell them that the door is open for them to leave.
So they did.

M0nica Sun 27-Jul-25 18:45:52

MaizieD

^The growth of Reform is the result of all political parties only talkiing to the extremists in their parties and never listening to what the electorate is really saying - and means.^

Who are the 'extremists' that the LP are talking to, MOnica?

In the past Corbyn and his cronies, and all those people who were once in Labour and are now flocking to his new party.

fancythat Sun 27-Jul-25 18:17:39

Farage is listening to everything the electorate is saying

You have a point there.
He does seem to at least listen.
Personally, I cant say I feel at all listened to by Starmer and the Labour Party.
I seem to tune out the conservatives. Probably need to tune in again to see what they currently are saying.

eazybee Sun 27-Jul-25 17:02:00

Farage is listening to everything the electorate is saying, and promising almost everything they want.
Two big problems.
He has no practical solutions to to fulfil his promises, any more than the Conservatives had and Labour is now discovering. Sharp lawyers and ECHR defeat most objectives, and the present PM toadying to Europe and Trump alternately, whilst trying to play Ruthless Leader back home convinces no-one.

Farage is totally unable to work with anyone else. Watch his 'discussion' programmes with seasoned politicians, not to mention his own brief-lived MPs. They always end with him talking over his guests out and drowning them out.

MaizieD Sun 27-Jul-25 16:24:35

The growth of Reform is the result of all political parties only talkiing to the extremists in their parties and never listening to what the electorate is really saying - and means.

Who are the 'extremists' that the LP are talking to, MOnica?

M0nica Sun 27-Jul-25 15:36:00

Ilovecheese

But the current leader is not at all left wing. I know that he said that he was left wing in order to secure the leadership but he is pretty much continuing with Conservative economic policy.

Reform was gaining ground well before this new party was announced. The success of Reform can be laid squarely at Starmer's door I believe.

No, you cannot blame Stramer for Reform. Reform is a right wing party with policies that Labour would never espouse.

The growth of Reform is the result of all political parties only talkiing to the extremists in their parties and never listening to what the electorate is really saying - and means.

Iam64 Sun 27-Jul-25 14:37:49

I’m a Labour Party member. I voted for Starmer. I’m pleased with our yiung Labour MP. I’m stunned by how dreadful the comms team is. The govt is doing some good things that you’d expect from a Labour govt yet they’re making such a mess in a number of ways, that negatives dominate the headlines

I don’t see Starmer as responsible for the success of Reform. Give Farage his due, he’s an effective populist communicator, something Starmer isn’t sadly. The govt did inherit an absolute mess. There’s no doubt that the majority is now increasingly anxious about the impact and financial cost of the arrival of so many men seeking asylum. Starmer attempted to demonstrate his acceptance of that and intention to try and make changes. His speech was no doubt written for him, it’s surprising that he didn’t change the island of strangers to avoid winding up those of us who remember Enoch Powell and fear racism.
There’s some truth in the often repeated view, Labour didnt win, the Conservatives totally

Ilovecheese Sun 27-Jul-25 14:17:54

Starmer has been trying to attract Reform voters, his "island of strangers" speech, as mentioned by Eleothan being a prime example. This, and Rachel Reeves's trickledown economics policies is what has led more left leaning voters to move away from Labour, this was happening long before any new party was being formed.

Casdon Sun 27-Jul-25 13:25:24

I don’t disagree with what you’ve said MaizieD, I was just pointing out that as your first sentence confirmed, the success of Reform cannot be, as Ilovecheese put it, ‘laid squarely at Starmer’s door’.

I do think that we will see a different approach from the government by next spring, I’m not expecting major changes before that.

MaizieD Sun 27-Jul-25 13:09:50

I appreciate that, but what she posted was inaccurate.

I suppose 'inaccurate' depends on how you look at it. I don't think Reform's 'success' in the 2024 GE had much to do with Labour's policies.

So I'd kind of agree with you there, but I think that Reform's success in the local government elections this year were partially driven by Labour's startling failure to propose/implement anything which would make any improvement to 'ordinary' people's lives. Labour just insistently promised them more hardship.

You may think I'm being unfair in the light of attempts to enumerate Labour's 'achievements' over the past year, but Labour itself isn't shouting about them and their economic 'austerity' policy (we can't afford this and we can't afford that and people will have to endure a bit of hardship before it gets better) doesn't produce the instant 'change' that people were hoping for.

It's no good promising improvement in 2 or 3 (or 20) years time. Something big has to happen NOW. But it isn't...

nightowl Sun 27-Jul-25 12:59:36

Grantanow

Personally competent or not, Corbyn's new party will split the Labour vote and let Farage's party in. A disaster for which Corbyn will be responsible.

Perhaps Keir Starmer would have been wiser to keep Jeremy Corbyn in the party and lead a Labour Party that truly was a ‘broad church’. If anyone has split the Labour vote it is Starmer himself.

As Tony Benn said ‘the Labour Party has never been a socialist party, but it’s always had socialists in it’. There is strength in a range of views. Perhaps Starmer just hasn’t been in politics long enough to learn from the past.

Casdon Sun 27-Jul-25 12:49:41

MaizieD

Casdon

Ilovecheese

But the current leader is not at all left wing. I know that he said that he was left wing in order to secure the leadership but he is pretty much continuing with Conservative economic policy.

Reform was gaining ground well before this new party was announced. The success of Reform can be laid squarely at Starmer's door I believe.

That’s illogical, given that it was the Tories who lost seats to Reform at the last election, not Labour?

But Labour isn't doing anything to counter Reform. So far they have just been attempting to 'outReform' them. Taking Labour much further to the right than many labour voters find acceptable.

I think that is what is informing Ilovecheese's comment.

I appreciate that, but what she posted was inaccurate.

Eloethan Sun 27-Jul-25 12:48:47

An example of "attempting to out-Reform Reform" is the "an island of strangers" comment, which Starmer then apologised for. How can people have trust in him when he makes a statement and then, only when it causes a furore, realising he has made a tactical error, apologises for it?

I am not bashing Labour as I had been a member for many years and believe that the party achieved many good things during the times it was in power. I think the party now has an enormous mountain to climb. They will upset different people with almost every decision they make and it seems unfair because the chaos has not been their doing.

I think if they had not treated Corbyn so badly I would still be a member of the party, but I was so disappointed that they joined in with the attack dogs against Corbyn, rather than target the greed, inefficiency and corruption of the Conservative Party.

Rosie51 Sun 27-Jul-25 12:45:44

Anniebach

Owen Jones is so excited about Corbyn’s party !

Even if I didn't know anything about Jeremy Corbyn or his new party that would be enough to put me right off! An Owen Jones endorsement is a red flag warning any time.

MaizieD Sun 27-Jul-25 12:32:41

Casdon

Ilovecheese

But the current leader is not at all left wing. I know that he said that he was left wing in order to secure the leadership but he is pretty much continuing with Conservative economic policy.

Reform was gaining ground well before this new party was announced. The success of Reform can be laid squarely at Starmer's door I believe.

That’s illogical, given that it was the Tories who lost seats to Reform at the last election, not Labour?

But Labour isn't doing anything to counter Reform. So far they have just been attempting to 'outReform' them. Taking Labour much further to the right than many labour voters find acceptable.

I think that is what is informing Ilovecheese's comment.

Casdon Sun 27-Jul-25 12:04:17

Ilovecheese

But the current leader is not at all left wing. I know that he said that he was left wing in order to secure the leadership but he is pretty much continuing with Conservative economic policy.

Reform was gaining ground well before this new party was announced. The success of Reform can be laid squarely at Starmer's door I believe.

That’s illogical, given that it was the Tories who lost seats to Reform at the last election, not Labour?

Ilovecheese Sun 27-Jul-25 11:28:19

But the current leader is not at all left wing. I know that he said that he was left wing in order to secure the leadership but he is pretty much continuing with Conservative economic policy.

Reform was gaining ground well before this new party was announced. The success of Reform can be laid squarely at Starmer's door I believe.