Whitewavemark2
Does anyone know why the Greenham common women who took sledgehammers to military planes amongst other serious damage weren’t classed as terrorists?
In short
They broke the law, but their methods stayed within the realm of civil protest rather than terrorism under the UK’s legal and political definitions of the time. The government preferred to treat them as a public order problem, not a security threat in the same league as the IRA or later Islamist groups.
If you want, I can also contrast this with how modern UK counter-terrorism laws could theoretically reclassify similar protests today — because definitions have broadened since the 1980s, and the picture would be very different now. Would you like me to do that?
ChatGPT