Gransnet forums

News & politics

Will Trump really support Ukraine at meeting with Putin?

(344 Posts)
NanKate Wed 13-Aug-25 20:33:23

Trump is full of words but whether he will achieve anything I don’t know.

He could walk away and blame Zelensky.

David49 Sat 16-Aug-25 12:13:26

Whitewavemark2

So Trump is now looking much weakened, both visually (did anyone notice that as he came down the steps from the plane?) and politically.

There is a large section of the Republican Party which is ready to push back against Trump.

It has a huge package of sanction against Russia ready to be signed off, and it is very ready to support both NATO and Ukraine.

Let’s hope they prevail.

I’m not quite sure what you are saying here.

If you are saying that a lot of Republican want more action against Russia - there are plenty of hawks amongst those ranks would be thinking that way, mostly involved in the arms industries that will benefit.

Sanctions are a possibility and will hurt Russia, BUT if Europe does decide to escalate the war Putin is likely to use that to threaten Nuclear escalation, are we willing to call his bluff on that.

Today we had breakfast with my brother in law who lives in US and a staunch Democrat, normally hasn’t got a good word for him, even he accepts that Trump has done his best to find peace. It’s just not a big issue in the US and they certainly don’t want to start a war over Ukraine, Trumps advisors will be telling him and others don’t escalate this

Smileless2012 Sat 16-Aug-25 12:05:25

talks have brought peace between Russia and Ukraine closer than ever!!! What a load of BS. Do KS and other heads of European countries think we're all stupid?

It's about time we and the rest of Europe stopped kowtowing to Trump whose kowtpowing to Putin.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 16-Aug-25 11:58:06

Listening and reading - it seems that Trump has lost the benefit of the doubt in his ability to deal with Putin.

An overwhelming majority of the USA including maga now see Putin as the bad guy and in turn support ukraine.

If trump is sensible he will allow punitive sanctions that are set up to be enforced and to revisit the 300 BN assets. The republicans are up for this.

The problem is why isn’t Trump?

Casdon Sat 16-Aug-25 11:52:55

ronib

What would be more useful is to check your facts wwm2

I don’t understand your need to promote a pro Russia rhetoric ronib. Ukraine was a country hundreds of years before the Russian revolution, called different names, under different empires. I don’t think you understand the concept of sovereignty at all, even in the context of the UK.

foxie48 Sat 16-Aug-25 11:48:34

Ronib I am struggling to understand what your POV actually is, on one hand you don't like wars on the other you seem to be saying if a big country sees strategic advantage in invading another country, then that's perfectly OK. Can I also correct you with regard to Ukraine and NATO. NATO is not "stoking" anything, it is Ukraine who wants to join NATO
"Ukraine joined NATO's Partnership for Peace in 1994 and the NATO-Ukraine Commission in 1997, then agreed to the NATO-Ukraine Action Plan in 2002 and entered into NATO's Intensified Dialogue program in 2005. In 2010, during the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych, the Ukrainian parliament voted to abandon the goal of NATO membership and re-affirm Ukraine's neutral status, while continuing its co-operation with NATO.[3] In the February 2014 Ukrainian Revolution, Ukraine's parliament voted to remove Yanukovych, but the new government did not seek to change its neutral status.[4][5][6] Russia then occupied and annexed Crimea, and in August 2014 Russia's military invaded eastern Ukraine to support its separatist proxies. Because of this, in December 2014 Ukraine's parliament voted to end its neutral status,[7] and in 2018 it voted to enshrine the goal of NATO membership in the Constitution.[8][9]" WIKI

Whitewavemark2 Sat 16-Aug-25 11:46:48

GrannyGravy13

Our PM has made a statement saying that the talks have brought peace between Russia and Ukraine closer than ever.

Also several heads of European countries and our PM have made a joint statement in a similar vein.

I imagine they know more than the Trip presenters.

I think if you want to interpret what europe is saying is that “thank good we persuaded Trump to not make a deal without consulting us”

There is no peace nor unless much more pressure is put onto Putin will there be one.

Putin at present has absolutely no reason to agree to peace.

GrannyGravy13 Sat 16-Aug-25 11:40:18

Our PM has made a statement saying that the talks have brought peace between Russia and Ukraine closer than ever.

Also several heads of European countries and our PM have made a joint statement in a similar vein.

I imagine they know more than the Trip presenters.

ronib Sat 16-Aug-25 11:35:51

What would be more useful is to check your facts wwm2

Whitewavemark2 Sat 16-Aug-25 11:32:48

What is useful to remember is just how small Russia is.

Their economy is only the size of Spain, so you can see how difficult it will be for Putin to continue this war long term.

The west needs to pile in.

The job would be so easily done.

NotSpaghetti Sat 16-Aug-25 11:28:13

Whitewavemark2
I think we can all guess!

Whitewavemark2 Sat 16-Aug-25 11:21:04

Europe must put more pressure onto Trump..

The point is that Trump could destroy Russia’s economy overnight - give the 300bn frozen assets to Ukraine and stop Russia in its tracks.

But he clearly doesn’t want to.

Why?

ronib Sat 16-Aug-25 11:15:56

I realise that Wwm2 wrote NATO and not the UN. So thinking about NATO, aren’t they currently stoking the fires to encourage Ukraine to membership? Much to Putin’s horror which will only encourage further escalation and deaths.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 16-Aug-25 11:14:44

That is what we all operate under!

NATO for a start!

Europe is under existential threat from Putin - make absolutely no mistake about that and without the rule of law under which all the countries operate under until you get outliers like Putin and Netanyahu - then that will be when NATO will be our defence.

David49 Sat 16-Aug-25 11:10:35

ronib

Wwm2 interesting. International law and the UN - what good have they done in this conflict or in any others? They are totally ineffective.

A total waste of time when it comes to ending conflict, also for bringing war criminals to justice, these war leaders are putting their lives on the line less than troops they command ICJ and international law means nothing, the only thing that matters is winning.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 16-Aug-25 11:07:29

LizzieDrip

Whitewavemark2

Listening to trip.

I think that they are right when they say that Zelenskii must insist that there is no media circus before the meeting.

Absolutely agree.

Also, the meeting should be conducted in the participants’ first language, with interpreters.

During the previous WH meeting Zelenskyy was at a distinct disadvantage because it was conducted in his third language!

It will be interesting to see what actually happens.

What AC and RS are saying is that in fact Putin is in a very weak position. His economy is going down the pan, he has lost a lot of allies and if we firmed up the sanctions and supported Zelenskii with the appropriate where with all, then he would be done for.

But Putin constantly - as we have seen- snatches victory from the jaws of defeat and in my opinion it can’t mean anything other than what he’s got on Trump.

ronib Sat 16-Aug-25 10:51:59

Wwm2 interesting. International law and the UN - what good have they done in this conflict or in any others? They are totally ineffective.

LizzieDrip Sat 16-Aug-25 10:51:17

Whitewavemark2

Listening to trip.

I think that they are right when they say that Zelenskii must insist that there is no media circus before the meeting.

Absolutely agree.

Also, the meeting should be conducted in the participants’ first language, with interpreters.

During the previous WH meeting Zelenskyy was at a distinct disadvantage because it was conducted in his third language!

It will be interesting to see what actually happens.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 16-Aug-25 10:42:23

Listening to trip.

I think that they are right when they say that Zelenskii must insist that there is no media circus before the meeting.

Visgir1 Sat 16-Aug-25 10:27:47

AGAA4

Putin wants the USSR back and Trump is helping him. He has brought Putin back onto the world stage. The my pal Putin act is only working one way in Putin's favour.

Agree.. Putin will want Alaska next? Trump is being played.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 16-Aug-25 10:27:36

ronib

I read that Melania reminds Trump all the time about ending the war. Trump may well be very down about the failure to see any progress or resolution. More bloodshed for what?

With your attitude that might is right - we could see all sorts of land grabs.

That is why there is the rule of international law and NATO.

ronib Sat 16-Aug-25 10:22:25

I read that Melania reminds Trump all the time about ending the war. Trump may well be very down about the failure to see any progress or resolution. More bloodshed for what?

Whitewavemark2 Sat 16-Aug-25 10:16:28

So Trump is now looking much weakened, both visually (did anyone notice that as he came down the steps from the plane?) and politically.

There is a large section of the Republican Party which is ready to push back against Trump.

It has a huge package of sanction against Russia ready to be signed off, and it is very ready to support both NATO and Ukraine.

Let’s hope they prevail.

LizzieDrip Sat 16-Aug-25 10:13:56

Putin wants the USSR back and Trump is helping him

Spot on!

Lavrov made this plain by arriving on American soil wearing a USSR sweat shirt.

Lathyrus3 Sat 16-Aug-25 10:08:30

ronib

Lathyrus3 what comment will ever undo any damage and injustice? It happened.

And you want to repeat it🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

ronib Sat 16-Aug-25 09:59:22

Lathyrus3 what comment will ever undo any damage and injustice? It happened.