Gransnet forums

News & politics

If this case fails, councils will be free to shut women’s spaces

(42 Posts)
Lathyrus3 Sat 16-Aug-25 09:35:15

Found you on the Internet Lcommunity and will be making a donation as soon as I finish my coffee.

Thanks for the heads up and for taking on the fight🙂

Lathyrus3 Sat 16-Aug-25 09:31:23

Yes. We’ve been captured too😱

All women need to stop using the trans lobby rhetoric and reclaim our own🙂

AGAA4 Sat 16-Aug-25 09:29:41

"Biological women" was the only way to differentiate from transwomen who claim they are women.

Mt61 Sat 16-Aug-25 09:23:10

Very important that that these spaces are protected- well done to you, I hope you succeed 🤞

Lathyrus3 Sat 16-Aug-25 09:06:02

OldFrill

"biological women" is that how women describe themselves now?

It should be “women” and “transwomen”, shouldn’t it?

No woman shoul have to define herself as a ‘biological woman”.
Woman should be enough.

Sarnia Sat 16-Aug-25 08:59:10

NanKate

I understand your frustration.

I am a member of the Women’s Institute and have complained to our National branch that the membership wasn’t given a vote on the inclusion of transwomen. They are still dithering on whether to return to an all biological Women’s Institute.

Women’s Righs are being eroded. 😏

So glad to hear from another frustrated WI member regarding Women's rights.
I am a WI member and find it has changed from the organisation I joined over 20 years ago.
I think National are keen to ditch the Jam & Jerusalem stereotype in favour of appealing to today's young women but run the risk of alienating their current membership, especially the older members. We need the younger generation to keep the WI going but on such important issues as transwomen the members should have been given a chance to vote.

OldFrill Sat 16-Aug-25 08:53:24

"biological women" is that how women describe themselves now?

AGAA4 Sat 16-Aug-25 08:38:05

Hope you win your case for all biological women. It's always a struggle.

Babs03 Sat 16-Aug-25 07:21:36

I agree entirely with safe spaces for biological women and so wish you luck with your case. It sounds like an uphill battle. Do try to keep us updated.

Sheebee1 Sat 16-Aug-25 07:08:25

I’m cynical. Shame the Supreme Court were unable to see they should put an enforcement in place. Maybe it wasn’t taken further to enable councils etc to continue to support men as women.

Aveline Sat 16-Aug-25 06:57:45

Good luck! Such a ridiculous situation to find ourselves in.

Bridie22 Sat 16-Aug-25 06:54:44

Good luck with your case, and for the good of biological womens rights I hope you are successful.

LCommunity Fri 15-Aug-25 23:00:59

Galaxy

I am a little unclear about your post, the supreme Court ruling has clarified the position on womens spaces, I understand that there will need to action to ensure organisations meet this requirement but the law has thankfully been clarified by the supreme Court ruling.

The Supreme Court ruling confirmed the law, but it didn’t create an enforcement mechanism. This case will force local authorities to actually follow that ruling in real-world decisions, rather than sidestepping it.

LCommunity Fri 15-Aug-25 23:00:36

NanKate

I understand your frustration.

I am a member of the Women’s Institute and have complained to our National branch that the membership wasn’t given a vote on the inclusion of transwomen. They are still dithering on whether to return to an all biological Women’s Institute.

Women’s Righs are being eroded. 😏

I agree, women’s rights are being steadily eroded, and policy without consultation is part of the problem. The law already protects single-sex provision, but in practice councils and organisations can ignore it with no consequence – that’s why this case matters.

Galaxy Fri 15-Aug-25 22:15:53

I am a little unclear about your post, the supreme Court ruling has clarified the position on womens spaces, I understand that there will need to action to ensure organisations meet this requirement but the law has thankfully been clarified by the supreme Court ruling.

NanKate Fri 15-Aug-25 22:10:34

I understand your frustration.

I am a member of the Women’s Institute and have complained to our National branch that the membership wasn’t given a vote on the inclusion of transwomen. They are still dithering on whether to return to an all biological Women’s Institute.

Women’s Righs are being eroded. 😏

LCommunity Fri 15-Aug-25 21:33:33

I’m the founder of L Community, a women-only lesbian network. Earlier this year I applied to convert a disused council-controlled Southwark railway arch into a female-only lesbian venue. It met every legal test under Schedule 3 of the Equality Act 2010 – single-sex only, necessary for privacy and dignity, no mixed-sex access.

I identified specific arches that would work, but said I would take any suitable building if an arch was not possible. An arch was simply the most affordable and practical starting point. Southwark Council still refused.

They’ve granted arches to LGBTQ+ groups, but in our case claimed they owned none – despite their own asset register listing hundreds. They also refused to carry out the Equality Impact Assessment they are legally required to do.

I’ve now exhausted their complaints process and have appointed solicitors to prepare for a judicial review. If it succeeds, the ruling will set a binding precedent forcing every local authority in the UK to apply Schedule 3 equally for women-only spaces. If we lose, it will signal that councils can block these spaces with no consequence.

This is the legal test case that will decide whether women’s spaces in the UK have real protection or only exist on paper. If moderators are happy, I’ll post updates here as the case progresses.