Gransnet forums

News & politics

Islamophobia

(194 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sun 21-Sept-25 09:40:56

Extracts from the The Observer Leader with which I entirely agree.

“Last weekend about 110000 people gathered in Whitehall to listen to Tommy Robinson and others spew hatred towards Muslims.

Their claims were baseless and their language abhorrent.

It was also actionable.

If the same rhetoric had been used about people who are black or Jewish there would have been arrests.

Whenever a community is dehumanised by racists it is dehumanised in the same way, with sweeping accusations of violence and menace with no regard for truth or the basic tenet of a just society that no one should be persecuted on the basis of their religion or race.

……………………
The Unite the Kingdom demonstration was a national disgrace.

Everyone who took part, even if simply by showing up and listening, was a bystander to hate; not free speech.

They are helping to spread fear amongst fellow citizens who happen to be Muslim.

Not seeing it that way is no excuse”

You only have to replace the word Muslim to Jewish to understand just how dangerous the rhetoric was.

This should never be allowed to happen again.

Allira Mon 22-Sept-25 19:40:38

fancythat

Not sure what to do about the Observer.
Had no idea any Uk paper wrote things like that.
May see if I can contact them.
The article is beyond the pale.

I have never been to a rally.
Looked it up in the Bible last year. Whether Christians are supposed to attend rallies of any kind.
Pretty sure that exact type of thing is not mentioned in the Bible. But found the nearest verses I could find[cant remember what they were now], and thought I didnt think I was supposed to go to any.
Best I could do.

Looked it up in the Bible last year. Whether Christians are supposed to attend rallies of any kind.

Jesus certainly rallied people.
He even managed to feed a crowd of five thousand with five barley loaves and two small fishes with some left over.

Of course, the crowd weren't Christian then, they were probably called Nazarenes.

Whitewavemark2 Mon 22-Sept-25 18:16:29

Oreo

It’s just one journalist’s view who writes for the Observer, no need for anyone to worry about it or give it credence.

It is the papers Leader!! Not an article.

Honestly do keep up.

petra Mon 22-Sept-25 17:14:03

fancythat

Not sure what to do about the Observer.
Had no idea any Uk paper wrote things like that.
May see if I can contact them.
The article is beyond the pale.

I have never been to a rally.
Looked it up in the Bible last year. Whether Christians are supposed to attend rallies of any kind.
Pretty sure that exact type of thing is not mentioned in the Bible. But found the nearest verses I could find[cant remember what they were now], and thought I didnt think I was supposed to go to any.
Best I could do.

Thanks for the laughs 😂

Oreo Mon 22-Sept-25 16:53:08

It’s just one journalist’s view who writes for the Observer, no need for anyone to worry about it or give it credence.

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 15:36:33

Not sure what to do about the Observer.
Had no idea any Uk paper wrote things like that.
May see if I can contact them.
The article is beyond the pale.

I have never been to a rally.
Looked it up in the Bible last year. Whether Christians are supposed to attend rallies of any kind.
Pretty sure that exact type of thing is not mentioned in the Bible. But found the nearest verses I could find[cant remember what they were now], and thought I didnt think I was supposed to go to any.
Best I could do.

Whitewavemark2 Mon 22-Sept-25 15:25:05

So I take it that you won’t be re-writing the OP ?

The Observer can now breathe a sigh of relief.

fancythat did you attend the rally?

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 15:20:13

Aim for peace. Not war.

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 15:19:38

And really, the article is so bad, it ought not to be repeated. Did it?

There cannot be peace amongst Countries and Nations and neighbours, when inflammatory things are repeated.

The media needs to be kept in check.

I dont have access to the Observer[not sure I have ever read it, online or otherwise].
The media need to be accounatable.

Whitewavemark2 Mon 22-Sept-25 15:19:25

fancythat

Whitewavemark2

fancythat

I have made a start, but am I writing it as Whitewave2, or me?
I presume Whitewave2?

Certainly not - because I didn’t write it - only copied it!

In which case
to help not be inflammatory to anyone anywhere

Dont call it the title you did. Write something instead like, an article from the Observer,

And, whoever wrote the article needs to be fired.
Or given lessons in how not to inflame.

😄😄 I should give up whilst you are slightly ahead or is that behind😄.

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 15:16:54

Whitewavemark2

fancythat

I have made a start, but am I writing it as Whitewave2, or me?
I presume Whitewave2?

Certainly not - because I didn’t write it - only copied it!

In which case
to help not be inflammatory to anyone anywhere

Dont call it the title you did. Write something instead like, an article from the Observer,

And, whoever wrote the article needs to be fired.
Or given lessons in how not to inflame.

Mt61 Mon 22-Sept-25 15:07:35

It’s a pity we can’t all just rub along nicely. The world would be a much safer place to live.

Whitewavemark2 Mon 22-Sept-25 14:58:21

fancythat

I have made a start, but am I writing it as Whitewave2, or me?
I presume Whitewave2?

Certainly not - because I didn’t write it - only copied it!

Whitewavemark2 Mon 22-Sept-25 14:55:01

fancythat

I need the questions answered before I can proceed
.

😄😄😄. The. Italics should give you a clue.

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 14:22:26

I need the questions answered before I can proceed
.

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 13:51:37

And is the first part all from the Observer? And the bit under the mini line, all from Whitewave?

growstuff Mon 22-Sept-25 13:48:24

fancythat

growstuff

fancythat

I could rewrite the opening post for you, and subject heading.
But that would be patronising you surely.

Or you could post a link[though not sure everyone can read one behind a paywall?] and then write something?

tbh, if newspapers are being inflammatory, then that fact needs to be debated at a wider level.
If they are doing that, therein lies a whole heap of trouble going forward.

Go on then! Rewrite it.

You will need to give me a day[have things to do], but I will.

I'll be waiting.

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 13:48:00

I have made a start, but am I writing it as Whitewave2, or me?
I presume Whitewave2?

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 13:41:47

growstuff

fancythat

I could rewrite the opening post for you, and subject heading.
But that would be patronising you surely.

Or you could post a link[though not sure everyone can read one behind a paywall?] and then write something?

tbh, if newspapers are being inflammatory, then that fact needs to be debated at a wider level.
If they are doing that, therein lies a whole heap of trouble going forward.

Go on then! Rewrite it.

You will need to give me a day[have things to do], but I will.

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 13:41:10

Anyone in the world who reads the opening post, and is inclined to be that way.

growstuff Mon 22-Sept-25 13:39:49

fancythat

I could rewrite the opening post for you, and subject heading.
But that would be patronising you surely.

Or you could post a link[though not sure everyone can read one behind a paywall?] and then write something?

tbh, if newspapers are being inflammatory, then that fact needs to be debated at a wider level.
If they are doing that, therein lies a whole heap of trouble going forward.

Go on then! Rewrite it.

growstuff Mon 22-Sept-25 13:38:56

fancythat

Who mentioned silence?
No one has mentioned being silent.

There in an in between.

It is all able to be done without being inflammatory at all.

Whom is the OP inflaming?

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 13:38:33

I could rewrite the opening post for you, and subject heading.
But that would be patronising you surely.

Or you could post a link[though not sure everyone can read one behind a paywall?] and then write something?

tbh, if newspapers are being inflammatory, then that fact needs to be debated at a wider level.
If they are doing that, therein lies a whole heap of trouble going forward.

fancythat Mon 22-Sept-25 13:34:56

Who mentioned silence?
No one has mentioned being silent.

There in an in between.

It is all able to be done without being inflammatory at all.

Whitewavemark2 Mon 22-Sept-25 13:16:04

foxie48

May I disagree, agreeably? I think we should post the things we see in newspapers even if some will disagree with our comments or with what has been posted. I agree with what the Observer said about the march except for the last sentence. I'm very much against banning marches unless they are promoted by proscribed organisations. Hopefully many more people will now realise that although they joined the march for reasons completely different to those that were expoused by Tommy Robinson and his ilk, they are still, in effect, supporting him.

And silencing the criticism is not clever.

Much wiser people have recognised that to remain silent will end in disaster.

Martin Niemoller knew of what he spoke. We should listen to their wisdom.

Oreo Mon 22-Sept-25 12:27:43

Agree with you too keepingquiet you make good points.