The man formerly known as Prince can fall no further....

Quote HS62 Sun 02-Nov-25 13:41:47
He should have been banished to the castle of mey, in caithness, Scotland, the queen mothers old roost. Not sure the locals would have him though.

Really, why Scotland ?

More to come now he is just plain mister?

Good grief seems people above a certain income shouldn’t have mental illness

How can all the victims of Epstein be honoured if their abusers are not named ?

Revenge not justice

StripeyGran

FriedGreenTomatoes2

His downfall is total. Even though I think he’s an entitled chump, I fear for his mental health with all this constant hounding by the media.

He'll be fine.

I fear for the mental health of those forced to live in squalid houses riddled with mice and cockroaches. Sod Andrew, he won't have to go through that.

Agree! But from the book I hear he is a dirty old man! But who knows the whole truth??

WM isn’t the fall guy, he’s the one in the public arena. I would very much hope that the many others are named, we do know that there are two Presidents.

Whether their wealth and power can prevent them from being placed in the public arena - who knows - I would hope not, but the fact that they aren’t yet out there should not mitigate against WM being held to account. The point is, we along with millions of others including it seems the RF (unless they know better, in which case their action point to guilt) are only making an assumption about his guilt, and until he stands in a court of law and stands trial no one will ever be sure.

He should have been banished to the castle of mey, in caithness, Scotland, the queen mothers old roost. Not sure the locals would have him though.

eazybee

Is it justice people want, or is it vengeance?

Possibly both.

I have no sympathy with lying person that he is! He needs to face the consequences of his actions as stated in Guiffres book!
He will never be broke or poor or worried about energy bills will he? I hope he gets all he deserves to honour the victims of Epstein et al

Is it justice people want, or is it vengeance?

I suppose anniebach that particular piece of information will never be made public at least in our lifetime and possibly not in our grandchildren’s life time either.

But the King and William now publicly say they support the victims in this case. As we in this country know that’s a huge statement coming from the palace.


So we make up our own mind about the information we do have knowledge about

To punish one only isn’t my thoughts on justice

And where is the justice that everyone's clamoring for Annie?

Agree Smileless, and if only Andrew named who is free to continue abusing ?

Yes Granniesunite but surely if the King delayed action allegedly ,so did the late Queen.

No one's suggesting Andrew shouldn't stand trial because the names of other suspects aren't in the public domain WW but you did say you don't care if he's the only one held to account.

If other suspects have been identified in those files and that information is not being made public and action being taken, that for me is a very warped sense of justice with Andrew as the fall guy.

There are clearly reasons why the files remained seal and whatever information Andrew may or may not have will not induce anyone to reveal their content.

I think the late monarch was a very intelligent and informed woman with the very best of intelligence officers at her disposal. To say otherwise would be inaccurate anniebach and undermine her.

The culprit here is her son Andrew who travelled around the world doing all sorts of stuff.

I also don’t believe that this disturbing information about this young girl…and remember she was a young girl when this happened…is the only information the palace has.

Perhaps the straw that finally broke the camel’s back is still to be made public.

Harry Dunn comes to mind

Such confidence than naming will bring about a trial , I can’t share it

Absolutely not! And to suggest that one person who has been named by an abused female should not stand trial, because other suspects have not yet been named - although identified in the Epstein files seems a very warped sense of justice to me.

Saying you don’t care if only Andrew is held to account rather than aiming for all those involved to be named and accused sounds more like an attack on one person rather than wanting justice for all those abused.
You’re probably in company with many Americans, especially DT.

Quote Granniesunite Sun 02-Nov-25 12:33:01
As the general pubic have known for decades the nickname for his brother I would hope that the King didn’t need pushing.

To be so uninformed about a member of such a prestigious and wealthy family who have body guards almost attached to them watching their every move. Difficult to imagine that this information was not passed on.

I have no proof of this of course.

But this is not a family that didn’t have the very best of protection from our dedicated and loyal officers.

His brother was putting them all at risk for a long time.

Really, you are accusing the late Queen of being aware of all Andrew did ?

Smileless2012
Good question Annie and is there anything to corroborate that he was?

smileless probably unnamed sources close to !

Of course not, but the ball will be set rolling. WM can almost certainly name names, and the Epstein files will then of necessity be wide opened to prove WM’s evidence.

Those women have never had an abuser - apart from Epstein in court. Justice must be seen to be done.