Starmer welcoming someone

So?
What happens now?
Is this charming man, now revealed as a threat to British people, allowed to stay?

Or does Starmer's ego come first?

The fact remains, he made the decision to welcome this man to this country before checking out facts,
His responsibility.

Anyone who lobbied for his release should have been aware of all his tweets and comments and background and if they didn’t, as seems apparent then they either agreed with his sentiments or were idiots.

We probably have no choice but to accept him back here as he has a British passport but nobody needed to lobby for his release or now say how wonderful it is that he’s here again.
Anyone who calls for the death of our police and calls UK citizens dogs and monkeys and is a massive hater of Jews should never be welcomed here and I hope the intelligence services keep a strict eye on him.

Posted before your 16.04pm post

That they all knew nothing?

Oreo- Which of those many individual idiots however were aware of the 2012 tweets at the time? When did you become aware?

LemonJam

That makes all the various political party members, Conservatives, Greens, Lib Dems who signed the cross party agreement to urge the L government to continue lobbying to secure his release idiots- along with the celebrities and along with the Untied Nations who investigated......

Thats one view.

What is another one?

Pig!

That makes all the various political party members, Conservatives, Greens, Lib Dems who signed the cross party agreement to urge the L government to continue lobbying to secure his release idiots- along with the celebrities and along with the Untied Nations who investigated ......

Well the evidence is there!

Perhaps he's had time to reflect and will become an upright, decent citizen of his adopted country now. Let's hope so.
Perhaps Dame Judi Dench will offer him a spare room.

Oh - is that a flying pi?

LemonJam

That makes all the various political party members, Conservatives, Greens, Lib Dems who signed the cross party agreement to urge the L government to continue lobbying to secure his release idiots- along with the celebrities and along with the Untied Nations who investigated......

Thats one view.

Yes it does, and it’s the only sensible view given what the man has said in his very many tweets.
Starmer being delighted is just sickening.

And Labour for being persuaded by the cross party petition. A full house apart from UK Reform- does anyone know if any Reform UK member signed that petition last December?

Plus the various celebrities who believed what they read in the newspapers and what they heard being debated in the House of Commons.

What was your view at the time Oreo?

That makes all the various political party members, Conservatives, Greens, Lib Dems who signed the cross party agreement to urge the L government to continue lobbying to secure his release idiots- along with the celebrities and along with the Untied Nations who investigated......

Thats one view.

Another serious lapse of judgment by Starmer as well as Lammy and others and Conservatives before them!

Casdon

Thank you LemonJam. Too many people jump on bandwagons before knowing the facts, and I’m glad you took the time to establish what they are.

There’s no bandwagon apart from the idiots in politics and the luvvie celebs who campaigned for this man to be flown back to Britain.
What a joke.

Maremia- I agree it's blatantly biased reporting by DM and in my view, shows Jenryk, Badenoch and Farage in a poor light also.

Allira- I agree there could be more going on here than we are being told. National security rather than between party political point scoring take precedence. Hence why I suggested cross party debate what is in public interest etc and whether police investigation warranted to gather evidence to support revoking UK citizenship- IF that is in the public interest.

I would expect that the current PM and previous Conservative PMs would be and would have been briefed by the UK Security
Services on a need to know basis of background facts and risks of which we may not be aware.

Casdon

fancythat

I think I am a shouldnt.
Though that might be a subject for another time.

Are you saying that you think the British Government does not have responsibility for securing the return of British citizens held in jails in military dictatorships fancythat? That really is worthy of a separate thread.

Depends if they are an enemy of the state, ie the UK.

Casdon

fancythat

I think I am a shouldnt.
Though that might be a subject for another time.

Are you saying that you think the British Government does not have responsibility for securing the return of British citizens held in jails in military dictatorships fancythat? That really is worthy of a separate thread.

I think I am.

It does nt happen, does it, that all get to return.

Casdon- I agree. Were the Conservative Party aware of the 2012 tweet "crimes" when lobbying over the years and granting UK citizenship? I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and accept not. Would be nice also, in reciprocation the C Paryy and others gives the Labour Party the same benefit of the doubt....

So, the Daily Mail has given only half of the story? The bit that makes Starmer out to be the only one to make the wrong decision?
Sounds a bit like biased reporting to me.

Hundreds of people have had their UK citizenship revoked.
As his is relatively new and controversial, it should have been easy to do so.

There is more going on here than we are being told.

Yes Allira. Starmer wasn’t PM in 2021, though, he is now dealing with somebody who is a British citizen. Whether somebody’s rights to be rescued from jail in a military dictatorship or not should depend on their crimes should be what is questioned - but whilst the policy is to rescue our citizens who have smuggled drugs, committed murders etc. from those regimes, this case is no different.

Fancythat- well he's back now because there was cross party lobbying for his release over some years. Plus the UN investigated and found that his Egyptian conviction/imprisonment was a breach of international law- for which he served 12 years.

There is no uk time limit on police investigating historical race hate if deemed sufficiently serious. I would advocate a CROSS PARTY debate whether such a police investigation is desirable/necessary/ and in the public interest for the 2012 tweets in the context of him serving 12 years in Egypt prison in circumstances found to have breached international law. That would be interesting.....

Doesn't stop GN s debating same question meanwhile....

Allira

Casdon

fancythat

I think I am a shouldnt.
Though that might be a subject for another time.

Are you saying that you think the British Government does not have responsibility for securing the return of British citizens held in jails in military dictatorships fancythat? That really is worthy of a separate thread.

A precedent has been set by the revoking of British citizenship even for those born in the UK.

He was born in Cairo and only acquired British citizenship relatively recently at the age of 40.

Revocation of British Citizenship:

Public Good: When the Home Secretary deems it "not conducive to the public good," often linked to national security.

Perhaps they think he might be useful, has information the authorities need.

Casdon

fancythat

I think I am a shouldnt.
Though that might be a subject for another time.

Are you saying that you think the British Government does not have responsibility for securing the return of British citizens held in jails in military dictatorships fancythat? That really is worthy of a separate thread.

A precedent has been set by the revoking of British citizenship even for those born in the UK.

He was born in Cairo and only acquired British citizenship relatively recently at the age of 40.

GG13- Not sure anyone is trying to excuse Fattah's race hate 2012 historical tweets?

Nigel Farage supported Lucy Conelly's more recent race hate online posts for which she was imprisoned however so I do think he is somewhat hypocritical.