Govt announces Ukrainian style scheme to bring thousands more migrants to UK

I read this morning on BBC news that it costs £144 per day to keep an asylum seeker in a hotel. In public accomodation it costs £23.
Labour are working to move asylum seekers from hotels to other cheaper accomodation.
They have closed many hotels now.

I posted detail on an earlier post- so not reading the thread either?

LemonJam

The UK doesn’t actively “encourage refugees” they come of their own accord as is their legal right under 1951 Human Convention. It’s more the case the UK currently seeks to meet its legal obligations.

The Labour Party has made much progress in clearing the backlog of applications it inherited from the Conservative Party and has employed more staff to process the applications so already doing what you ask. Are you not aware of this?

It’s been reported a few times on Gnet immigration threads, though. But unwelcome information is never assimilated, is it?

Well it certainly wouldn't be reported on GB news or in the Daily Mail.

If it isn't reported in MSM, then most folk will not know this, LemonJam.
Which newspaper would run with this,
'Labour accelerates asylum clear up'?

The UK doesn’t actively “encourage refugees” they come of their own accord as is their legal right under 1951 Human Convention. It’s more the case the UK currently seeks to meet its legal obligations.

The Labour Party has made much progress in clearing the backlog of applications it inherited from the Conservative Party and has employed more staff to process the applications so already doing what you ask. Are you not aware of this?

FriedGreenTomatoes2

We can’t deal or manage the influx we have.
Why encourage more? Doesn’t make sense to me plus we don’t have the necessary infrastructure to support more people at present.

I’d rather the government got cracking sorting out the huge backlog of asylum seekers already with us. Maybe by employing more teams of ‘processors’. That’d be a start. We obviously can’t keep up yet new arrivals rock up every day.

What a shambles.

Agree. How long before enough is enough.

MT62

MT62

No, but a lot of people do use that term.
I’ve worked with people living with mental health issues for twenty odd years 👍🏻 GS

Sorry I mean The Catswhiskas 🤦‍♀️

The two people I know (and I do know them very well) have each worked with people with mental health issues for well over 40 years. I really am surprised that anybody working in the field would use it to describe people with mental health issues because, as a phrase, it has a different meaning.

Why dont you all start a thread about it?
Since no one is agreeing with anyone else.

MT62

greyfur

What is a person with mental health please?

A person that can’t cope with the pressures & stresses of day to day living.
Can be from mild depression to a full blown, psychological breakdown.
But I think you already know that.

No, you have misunderstood what it means.

The term "Mental health" carries absolutely no implication of ANY negative measurement or assessment; or of any problem or difficulty.

Just like the term "physical health" gives no indication whether the state of a body is strong /well or weak /sick.

Old people used to say "he's got the kidneys" or "he's got the heart" & terminlology used to make us laugh.
Saying someone has mental health must be the 21st century equivalent.

MT62

No, but a lot of people do use that term.
I’ve worked with people living with mental health issues for twenty odd years 👍🏻 GS

Sorry I mean The Catswhiskas 🤦‍♀️

No, but a lot of people do use that term.
I’ve worked with people living with mental health issues for twenty odd years 👍🏻 GS

DaisyAnneReturns

"Time our own homeless, veterans & people with mental health came first."

That's everyone then. We all have "mental health" and if you are a reasonable and reasoning human being, all homeless people, veterans and those with mental health issues (which I guess is what you intended to say), is one of "our own".

👏👏

"Time our own homeless, veterans & people with mental health came first."

That's everyone then. We all have "mental health" and if you are a reasonable and reasoning human being, all homeless people, veterans and those with mental health issues (which I guess is what you intended to say), is one of "our own".

MT62

Wyllow3

I do regret coming across so strongly MT62, since I too in my personal life have had family suicides and coped with an Ex whose serious condition led him to abuse me over some years, and I am as well as a trained psychotherapist and worked in the field:
I too am a "customer" as was my sis and friends around me.

but, M62

the context was what you said a page back

as in

"Well that’s just it Catswhiskas, we have enough vile, creatures of our own in this country without bringing in even more vile, sexual predators, a lot with metal health"

You probably therefore know more than most the dangers of using this label to generalise and link "Mental Health" with "sexual predators" with no other explanation.

But its also confusing since the term "Mental Health" doesn't even mean "Mental illness"

never mind the essential distinguishing between what has happened to your family and to you and to those with a serious psychotic or very serious personality disorder condition that may lead to acting out sexuality inappropriately or to act violently.
We know for example that far more people with psychosis take their own life than attack others.

I am sorry too Wyllow3. It’s been a traumatic time these last few years.
I should have explained things more clearly, but most people refer to psychiatric problems has just plain ‘mental health’.

The vile people I refer to are these idiots who for example, won’t let an elderly lady use the hand rail on an escalator, (mentioned on another thread) or just larkers, that have consequences on other peoples lives, like the bloke who pushed a woman nearly head first under the wheels of a bus.

What I do know is that some people who have certain psychiatric disorders, can act inappropriately for some reason or other.
Yes & a lot do go on to take their own lives, whether that’s taking others with them which is probably very rare.

Two people very close to me work in the mental health field. Neither of them would refer to mental ill health as just "mental health".

I only have one bed in my house, which I'm not going to share with anybody.

Transparency- I've done the English speaking and cooking lessons 1 to 1 as a local volunteer- and food donations. Willing to continue if local request in same vein.

I am on an NHS waiting list for surgery, plus awaiting CT results of symptoms whilst waiting so not the best time for me to offer residence.

Thank you M62. 🫶

Good post LemonJam.

eazybee

I look forward to hearing of the experiences of people who are constantly telling us how to behave towards migrants, and who obviously will be first on the list to offer residence in their own homes.

The measure of success of the proposed scheme if implemented will not specifically be how many Gransnet posters put themselves forward to offer residence in their own homes.

Generally Gransnet posters may be of an older demographic, may be more risk averse as a result, may have health issues, may be on an NHS waiting list for surgery, more likely to live alone, more likely not be working, so more likely have reduced income so may not be able to afford the additional costs to their household by taking a refugee into their home. Many Granset posters may offer support for refugees, in a different wait via local volunteer activity- helping them speak English, cookery lessons for typical English dishes etc to demonstrate active support for refugees. One scheme is not exclusive of other schemes.

The measure of whether a Gransnet views this scheme as positive is not measured by their willingness to be first on the list to offer.residence in their own homes and be judged poorly if they did not do so. Neither does any Granset poster need to justify their choice on this matter.

The Government, society and individuals choose how they behave towards asylum seekers and refugees. There is a continuum from tolerance, compassion, empathy and active support and voting for a government at a GE that wishes to meet the Uk's legal obligations as set out in the 1951 Human Convention. The opposite end of the spectrum features hatred, antipathy a 'get them all out and/or stopping them coming in the first place' rhetoric and voting for a party at the next GE that is supportive of that rhetoric and a variety of views in between the 2 ends of the continuum. We get policy in line with what we vote for and currently the LP is in government.

Wyllow3

I do regret coming across so strongly MT62, since I too in my personal life have had family suicides and coped with an Ex whose serious condition led him to abuse me over some years, and I am as well as a trained psychotherapist and worked in the field:
I too am a "customer" as was my sis and friends around me.

but, M62

the context was what you said a page back

as in

"Well that’s just it Catswhiskas, we have enough vile, creatures of our own in this country without bringing in even more vile, sexual predators, a lot with metal health"

You probably therefore know more than most the dangers of using this label to generalise and link "Mental Health" with "sexual predators" with no other explanation.

But its also confusing since the term "Mental Health" doesn't even mean "Mental illness"

never mind the essential distinguishing between what has happened to your family and to you and to those with a serious psychotic or very serious personality disorder condition that may lead to acting out sexuality inappropriately or to act violently.
We know for example that far more people with psychosis take their own life than attack others.

I am sorry too Wyllow3. It’s been a traumatic time these last few years.
I should have explained things more clearly, but most people refer to psychiatric problems has just plain ‘mental health’.

The vile people I refer to are these idiots who for example, won’t let an elderly lady use the hand rail on an escalator, (mentioned on another thread) or just larkers, that have consequences on other peoples lives, like the bloke who pushed a woman nearly head first under the wheels of a bus.

What I do know is that some people who have certain psychiatric disorders, can act inappropriately for some reason or other.
Yes & a lot do go on to take their own lives, whether that’s taking others with them which is probably very rare.

Great post LemonJam

Just a beautiful afternoon in that park Wyllow. 🌳 🌳

Wylloow3- I enjoyed reading your 11.02 post.

A society that is cohesive, compassionate to multi cultures etc and tolerant and has free at point of to healthcare ( NHS not perfect I know) I believe is likely to be a healthier and happier society.