Home Office figures show 180 visas were issued to family members of Cameroon migrants for just 12 workers

The rules around dependants are actually more complicated than simply saying someone can bring 15 family members. For many work routes, the rules focus on a partner and dependent children, and eligibility can depend on the specific visa route and the family’s circumstances. What is particularly important is what happens to those family members if the main visa holder later loses their immigration permission or changes route.
consultantlm.uk/consultant-article/childs-uk-immigration-status-when-a-parent-loses-permission-to-stay

Allsorts - didn't you see Cossys's ?

Its an absolute disgrace our own young families cannot get even a rented home but we have enough money for them.. Soon people will turn. Who makes these daft decisions, even if its law change it.
Bagsetti I dont know where you get your reasoning from.I went to A and E recently and 80 percent originated from other countries. Several women covered head to toe in black in nearly 40 degrees, partners, men, western dress.
Cossy, what has your friends being Muslim got anything to do with large numbers from anywhere coming here? There's good and bad everywhere even atheists.

Cossy

“greyfur

Whitewavemark2
And yet another thread - thanks to GBNews😄😄. This obsession is worse than the Harry threads.
And after the initial pile on, nobody comes back to say they have reconsidered.“

Those very few whose raison d’etre is steeped in the hatred of certain groups, people, organisations. They don’t apologise or even acknowledge that they might ever be wrong.

In this example, any excuse to both get at the government AND migrants is just too good a chance to miss. Never mind about actual facts.

The scheme was set up in good faith, ironically by the Tories, it no longer exists. It’s a non-story, like many others, designed to be divisive.

At this point, I’m sure I’m not alone in feeling thoroughly sick of it all.

Migrants are not the case of all our woes, anymore than people on benefits are.

Well said. If people are looking for people to blame, try looking at sleazy multi-millionaires like Farage and Tice.

Sunshinegirls

Err the Cameroon care workers and dependants are probably laughing all the way to the bank😀 I'm certainly not laughing I feel like crying at what a joke the UK has become.

Laughing all the way to the bank? Care workers are on outrageously low pay for the work they do.

Without these migrants, who will be caring for us all in 10/20 years?

It must be very tiring getting worked up about inaccurate information time and time again.

greyfur

"But some of my best friends are Muslims"

"But some of my best friends are Muslims"

“greyfur

Whitewavemark2
And yet another thread - thanks to GBNews😄😄. This obsession is worse than the Harry threads.
And after the initial pile on, nobody comes back to say they have reconsidered.“

Those very few whose raison d’etre is steeped in the hatred of certain groups, people, organisations. They don’t apologise or even acknowledge that they might ever be wrong.

In this example, any excuse to both get at the government AND migrants is just too good a chance to miss. Never mind about actual facts.

The scheme was set up in good faith, ironically by the Tories, it no longer exists. It’s a non-story, like many others, designed to be divisive.

At this point, I’m sure I’m not alone in feeling thoroughly sick of it all.

Migrants are not the case of all our woes, anymore than people on benefits are.

Whitewavemark2

And yet another thread - thanks to GBNews😄😄. This obsession is worse than the Harry threads.

And after the initial pile on, nobody comes back to say they have reconsidered.

And yet another thread - thanks to GBNews😄😄. This obsession is worse than the Harry threads.

Obvious clickbait. Ignore.

NotSpaghetti

If they are self supporting and paying taxes (and more besides) they are not a burden.

That is not a fact that some people want to hear….

If they are self supporting and paying taxes (and more besides) they are not a burden.

It’s good that the bringing many family dependents here has now stopped but think how many are actually here over even just the last few years.
It should only ever have been open to a man with a wife and two children or no wife/children.
It’s the same in a different way of the thousands of Afghans here who were claimed to be huge extended family members.
The people who run this country are a joke.

MaizieD

The article in question is factually wrong

Economist Jonathan Portes corrects the figures on BlueSky:

‪Jonathan Portes‬
‪@jdportes.bsky.social‬
· 19h
Click bait racist bullshit from the Times/Chris Philp.

12 Cameroonians did not sponsor 15 dependants each.

12 new work visas were issued to Cameroonians.

180 visas were issued to dependants of the (many thousands of) Cameroonians *already here.

He further points out:

The journalist to whom this was credited has accepted this is both garbled and wrong and said that it will be corrected. Let's see..

bsky.app/profile/jdportes.bsky.social/post/3mpysbrty5227

Thanks for the facts from more reliable sources MazieD.

I'd never heard of the EasternEye newspaper in the original link- had to look it up. Apparently it's Asian owned and better known for publishing the annual Asian Rich List and Asian Business Awards annually.

Yes it's good that it isn't true Cossy.

Primrose53

The figures came from the Home Office.

The figures have been misused misinterpreted. The article writer has acknowledged this and said they will correct them.

From AI

A key caveat is that the 180 dependants were not necessarily accompanying those 12 new workers. Dependants can join Health and Care workers who arrived in earlier years, so it is not correct to conclude that each of the 12 workers brought 15 family members. The Home Office statistics record visas issued in the period, not family groupings.

As Portes pointed out.

When my pension goes in , I laugh all the way to Aldi.

NotSpaghetti

I confess that when I got paid I have occasionally laughed all the way to the bank, Cossy

🫣🫣 Haha

MaizieD

The article in question is factually wrong

Economist Jonathan Portes corrects the figures on BlueSky:

‪Jonathan Portes‬
‪@jdportes.bsky.social‬
· 19h
Click bait racist bullshit from the Times/Chris Philp.

12 Cameroonians did not sponsor 15 dependants each.

12 new work visas were issued to Cameroonians.

180 visas were issued to dependants of the (many thousands of) Cameroonians *already here.

He further points out:

The journalist to whom this was credited has accepted this is both garbled and wrong and said that it will be corrected. Let's see..

bsky.app/profile/jdportes.bsky.social/post/3mpysbrty5227

Thanks MaizieD. It’s always good to have a few facts, although it spoils the “story” for those with an agenda.

Overall immigration is actually down, and far fewer care workers are getting visas. The NHS and the Care System, depend on migrant workers to keep functioning.

I can’t imagine many Care Workers “laughing all the way to the bank”. It’s a hard job and poorly paid, as everyone knows.

The figures came from the Home Office.

Nandalot

Thank you, MaizieD and NotSpaghetti , for giving us some factual information about this. I do wish that the divisive rhetoric in the mass media would stop.

When there is news about people from Cameroon, it's OK to post a picture of refugees in a boat?

Would this apply to perhaps news about football teams...any old sporting picture will do. Rugby possibly?

Another Brexit bonus! Thanks Boris and taking back control😂

I confess that when I got paid I have occasionally laughed all the way to the bank, Cossy