Gransnet forums

News & politics

‘Signs of violence’: asylum seekers arriving in France injured after being deported from UK. Do Asylum seekers deserve to be kept safe from harm and injury on arrival in the UK?

(6 Posts)
LemonJam Mon 14-Sept-26 16:58:20

Is the UK in danger of losing empathy for those seeking asylum whilst their claims are being processed? French health service documents injuries including fractures and bruising after detention and return under ‘one in one out’ scheme
.
The pilot scheme involves one asylum seeker who crosses the Channel in a small boat being returned to France in return for another in northern France being legally brought to the UK to claim asylum. The scheme is due to end on 1 October.
Samusocial de Paris (SSP) has been commissioned by Île-de-France’s regional health agency to provide healthcare for asylum seekers returned to France in the first eight days after their deportation from the UK, when they are accommodated in a shelter in Paris.

They have documented the cases of 90 returnees between 22 January and 7 June 2026. All are young men, mostly in their 20s and early-30s, who sought sanctuary in the UK after fleeing a variety of conflict zones including Eritrea, Sudan and Afghanistan. About 1,400 people have been forcibly removed to France by the Home Office since the scheme began in August 2025.

The evidence compiled by SSP has been submitted to the French Assembly’s cross-party inquiry into the impact of the Anglo-French border deals known as Le Touquet agreements. This evidence comes from their own clinical consultations with returnees and some hospital reports from those sent to A&E.

According to the report: “Consultations are revealing signs consistent with recent physical and psychological violence as well as the consequences of prolonged detention in conditions described as particularly degrading.” It states that the physical and psychological conditions documented are “explicitly linked to the implementation of the France-British agreement”.
The report adds: “The frequency and recurrence of the incidents reported by people transferred under the Franco-British agreement appear particularly worrying.”

SSP recommends that a mechanism should be established to collect information on allegations of mistreatment by the British authorities that can be sent to the UK. It also suggests reporting this issue to the French prosecutor under article 40 of the French code of criminal procedure.

Nihal Osman, a programme coordinator for Médecins Sans Frontières, which also provides health support for this group of returnees, said: “This one in one out agreement is a machine for psychological destruction. The deeply concerning physical injuries sustained whilst in detention in the United Kingdom, which we have documented among those deported, must be viewed in the light of a serious psychological deterioration.”

The UK Home Office and the company Mitie, which provides the guards for the asylum seekers, have been approached for comment.

OldFrill Mon 14-Sept-26 17:02:35

Are you Diane Taylor?

Whitewavemark2 Mon 14-Sept-26 17:23:11

I very much hope this isn’t true.

What a shameful thing.

LemonJam Mon 14-Sept-26 17:25:54

The evidence compiled by SSP has been submitted to the French Assembly’s cross-party inquiry into the impact of the Anglo-French border deals known as Le Touquet agreements- so we await to see what happens next....

Casdon Mon 14-Sept-26 17:31:06

What we don’t know from this account is whether the returned migrants were either trouble makers or bullied by other migrants or other people in the community where they were housed, so were selected for early return, or if they were mistreated by officials. I hope names and details are made available, there shoukd be records if either of the former two scenarios happened.

LemonJam Mon 14-Sept-26 17:43:37

It does happen- see BBC Panorama programme " Undercover Britain's Immigration Secrets". An undercover reporter worked as a custody officer wearing a secret camera for months to expose conditions inside Brooke House, Immigration Removal Centre near Gatwick airport in 2017- some 9 years ago. Footage showed abuse and violence, both physical and emotional and a toxic culture.

This lead to The Brook House Public enquiry- an independent investigation of allegations of inhuman and degrading treatment at Brook House. It identified systemic problems with healthcare provision, a failure of clinical safeguards and a "culture of dehumanisation"- noting that medical services sometimes failed to identify vulnerable detainees, torture survivors and mental ill individuals.

So not new, not recent. Does this culture prevail is one question. However the anti asylum seeker rhetoric has grown since 2017 and become much more political.

It seems to be that detainees should be cared for and safeguarded whist awaiting processing of their asylum claim and whilst awaiting deportation if their application is not granted - but am I in the minority I wonder.