Blondiescot
Absolute nonsense - as someone else has pointed out, artistes like Elvis, The Beatles and The Rolling Stones were all denounced for allegedly corrupting young people - and I bet a lot of you moaning about today's music loved them! What about punk - that was my music in my early teens, and somehow I survived and became a (relatively) normal adult...
Music has always been about rebellion - and long may that be the case.
Agree Bondiescot
Music is changing for each generation. Some music overlaps generations, such as soul, motown and indie. My parents in the 1960s couldn't understand my love of soul. I don't listen to as much new music as I used to but still at 71 enjoy indie music and new indie artists.
You ask who there is now Chestnut. My eldest granddaughter at the age of 14 (2 years ago) introduced me to an artist called Billy Eilish who would be classed as alternative indie.
I found it easy to enjoy music my children liked as there is a 20 and 22 year gap between us. However, there is a 55 - 60 year gap between myself and my grandchildren.
Like my parents not liking or understanding soul music, I don't enjoy listening to or understand rap. However, there's a wide range of genres these days so there is plenty of choice for the 10-14 year olds. I agree that there are some artists I would want my grandchildren to listen but artists such as Billie Eilish are not a let down.