Initially I felt the same way as KateF.
Then I decided to try to find out what sentence this man could have been given, as on the surface, 2years+ seemed a harsh.
Especially considering this seems to have been his first offence.
The sentencing guidelines start at community service and go up to 7 or 10years.
IMV Its looks like the judge was of the opinion that this man was not blameless, and as such has given him (imv) an appropriate sentence to reflect this.
Clearly if the judge thought the man was 'preyed' upon by a predatory girl who without doubt looked 19yrs, he could have been given a much lighter non custodial sentence.
He chose not to, for reasons we can only speculate upon.
To my mind, its a bit like the buyer beware caveat when buying second hand cars. Predatory men who think casual pickups are there for the taking should bear the responsibility if all goes wrong.
The girl was/is a vulnerable child with difficulties, and as such should always be protected from herself, her choices and others exploitation.
Just wondering what ss could have done to help prevent this, and why her family didn't have the house locked down if they feared for her welfare? She seems a danger to herself.
Good Morning Sunday 17th May 2026


