4allweknow
In my younger days I volunteered with older people. Some wanted to go to bingo, to a pub for a pint, the cinema,theatre, visit a library or museum or just chat over a cuppa. The reasons given by many for wanting to go out was that they wanted to feel like everyone else mixing with all ages and seeing what was going on outside their four walls. I used my car for transport, was given fuel costs as well as eg cost of cinema ticket. The organisations involved in providing social activities now all seem to focus on grouping them together. Yes this is more cost effective and for some does help combat loneliness but is not for all. Surely there should be more funding "attached" to an individual to allow them to help combat loneliness in a way they would feel they are still an individual and able to make choices. We keep hearing about babyboomers clogging up the system and being a drain on services. There have been statistics on population growth for decades. Boomers are now in their 70s why does it seem a surprise to Governments that there is now a large population of older people. Why has this not been planned for and systems developed to cope with the resultant needs of older people?
Interesting points 4allweknow - although actually more young people experience loneliness than any other age group which can be surprising. There are definitely things which need funding - but actually some of the simple things in life such as calling someone, writing a letter or going for a walk together don't and can be really helpful.



