Should we censor historical language?

Galen meant to add a for your last comment!

I loved that story too and remember the illustrations as being wonderful. I also had a much loved golly called Mr Stripes!

I have retold the story of LBS to children but changed the name to anIndian name and used local words for mum and dad. Children loved the story and the ingenuity of the boy in saving himself from the fierce and proud tiger! it is a story of a warm and loving family in India and has a lot to recommend it apart from the insensitive use of 'British Raj' institutionally racist terms! Helen Bannerman may not have thought she was being racist but the attitudes of the time certainly were.

Many teachers have used books written in different times to initiate discussion and debate and I think that is healthy.

I rather liked "little black sambo' as a child. Particularly the pancakes at the end! I suppose its also politically incorrect as the tiger is depicted as wicked and dissolves into fat to cook the pancakes in.
Wonder:- knowing what effect the Chinese attribute to tiger parts, what the effect on little sambo would have been? Would he have become big Sambo?

(Just thinking)

We had a black lab called Nigger and my Father didn't have a racist bone in his body.

I agree!

I think I would draw the line well before that, Petallus, as I guess, would you. It's one thing leaving the past in context and explaining why it's been left behind, and another to be displaying gollies in the back of a car.

I was rather surprised to see a 'golly' looking out of the back of a 4 x 4 the other day.

Guy Gibson of Dambuster's fame had a black labrador called Nigger. It was still in the film when it was recently shown.

The film was on TV recently, and the word was still in there, appropriately, as it showed the prejudice that Atticus was defending his client against. I think where such words are used in a way that doesn't readily reflect the culture or views of the time, it would be helpful to insert an explanatory paragraph at the beginning of the book.

"To Kill a Mockingbird" was often on the exam syllabus, certainly till I retired a few years ago. I remember the shock shown by Y11 at the n word, but they accepted that it was part and parcel of the book.

The n word was proscribed, surely, because of the deep offence it caused to black people? Wasn't it from the vocabulary of the slave owners?

I do think we need to be sensitive about using offensive words, of course. But I think the censoring of historical works is not useful. Was it Dr Johnson who changed to ending of "King Lear"? Or did he just deplore it?

(Slight digression - equally, I remember Y7 getting very cross because someone's father, in a novel set in the fifties, actually smoked!!)

If the words we don't like are all removed from the books that contain them, how will future generations know that the words existed, or what they meant?

Seen in the context of the original stories, they don't seem as racist as they do when used as weapons. Enid Blyton and so on were not racist the way aggressive racists nowadays are racist, attacking with words they know will hurt, they were being ordinary for their day.

Leaving them in place shows how the intention shifted and became cruel, despite the authors being innocent of bad intentions. Eliminating them leaves a gap in the record, and falsifies history.

Well my late brother in law was called Nigel and throughout his boyhood was always called - by everyone - the n word. Nicknames seem to have gone out of fashion but most people had one when I was young and his was just another one.

My Mum was a keen sewer and had reels and reels of "Sylko" cotton - one of which was n....r brown. Then there was the Agatha Christie book "Ten Little Ns". When did it become such an insulting word which had to be censored out of use? Ireally don't understand how words can become proscribed.

Lilygran some words are just too awful to go unchallenged - the N word being one.

If an old book is to be re-printed then I think such words should be replaced - if you had black or mixed-race grandchildren you wouldn't want to see them described as Little Niggers would you?

Of course we should not censor books from the past. If they contain things we would not say or refer to now, we should educate the readers to recognise that, and to take them in the context of the society in which they were written.

Otherwise we will be in the same position as the Victorians whose copies of Shakepeare's plays (and much else) had been revised by Thomas Bowdler of bowdlerising fame.