Oh soontobe you can't see that there isn't hate there. It is not a case of "If you are not for me, you are against me" It is possible to be tolerate both sexual and religious differences, though it has taken a long time for humanity to recognise that possiblity.
There is not hate, but love, but it is for all people, not just those who love God, not just those who follow him, but also for those who don't follow God, or whose love for one another doesn't fit the conventional pattern. If God made and loves the heterosexuals, He also made and loves the homosexual ones.
If He didn't make and love one lot, then He didn't make and love the others, they are interchangable as far as He is concerned. Doesn't it say somewhere that there will be no marrying in heaven, or giving in marriage? So sexuality is completely irrelevant to God and religion, it is purely an earthly thing to continue the species - and "to provide comfort one to the other" It is not a lifestyle choice, it is an inbuilt instinct - that has been shown.
I don't like this case at all - I agree that it was a test case, the order could have been placed in a much better way, without all the confrontation and heartache, and those who placed it were acting in a narrow way themselves.
But placed it was, and the law is that it is illegal to discriminate against anyone for their sexual orientation. If the baker had been cleared of that, others could have discriminated in much more serious ways - hatred, violence - and argued that they had the right. No-one is asking you to join them, just tolerate them.