Gransnet forums

AIBU

ESTRANGEMENT- The silent epidemic! Let's get this out of the cupboard.

(1001 Posts)
Otw10413 Wed 18-Feb-15 22:13:05

It is time to quantify the terrible development in our increasingly secular family lives, the pain and heartache faced by those who have been 'cut out' of their Children's and Grandchildren's lives. Please, whether it was for a brief and now resolved, or extended or as in my case, repeated period, could you add your story, just one entry per tragic tale. It is something that our sociologists should start researching as it is clearly a very damaging development to all sides, hence the silence that shrouds the pain. I personally have lost access rights to my grandchildren, and I have no doubt about the loss and pain I suffer but also the positive influence and confidence gained by small children from their interaction with loving grandparents (already measured) is ignored as a right of the young. So why hasn't this society taken steps to ensure that such damaging behaviours are limited for the sake of the children; it is their way to connect with their histories and for many, it has led to the inspiration behind many many great lives. It may be painful but I think that this is an invisible infection which has taken hold in an ever-increasing "disposable"society. It might be useful to explain what you feel lies behind the terrible decision to stop talking and what you feel might be the answer in your case. Also how you cope/coped with the prolonged or short periods of estrangement.
Thank you if you can let your story be counted.
flowersflowersflowersflowersflowersflowersflowersflowersflowers

Dorothy16 Sun 19-Feb-17 19:42:08

When our estranged daughter was growing up she was not abused by me or her father and we take pride in ourselves for parenting her to our very best.

The money it cost us to raise our daughter growing up into adulthood, her upkeep, clothes, toys, schooling, out of school activities, holidays, college, uni, deposit towards her first flat and lavish wedding two years before she cut us out is not a gripe to us now. We did all that because we were her parents and not because we wanted her to beholden to us for the rest of her life.

10 years on since she cut us off do I ever think how ungrateful she is being now for accepting our help back then and then cutting us off ? No. That was then and this is now. When it was then she was grateful, maybe wrote us a thank you card back then or took us out for a meal in appreciation back then.

Our little girl grew up and became an adult with her own mind, her own opinions and has chosen the path of estranging from the whole of her family, it's her choice and no amount of pleading with her is going to bring her back.

For me personally the best thing I can let my daughter see me doing (via hearing it on the grapevine of mutual acquaintances) is getting on with my life and walk away from any toxic relationship she might want to have with me via posting on open forums and other social media hoping that I might see it.

One day, her anger might fizzle out and if it does she knows where to find me and we can talk things through.

There is life after estrangement, hard as that might be for those still grieving to accept but there is life after estrangement or for as long as the estrangement might last.

Bibbity Sun 19-Feb-17 19:38:30

Smiless I'm sorry you had to make that decision.
It must've destroyed you.
I do hope you continue on in happiness.
I have absolutely no doubt there are BSC absuive D/SIL. I've seen them on our boards and they get absolutely shredded and put in their place.
Can't say I've seen the same happen here though.
You seem to support dangerous and potentially damaging actions and that's what makes some people question the validity of threads here.

Norah Sun 19-Feb-17 19:26:30

Smiless I'm happy for you, I see you're pleased in your choice. Good that.

Smileless2012 Sun 19-Feb-17 18:59:56

I'm not upset with my choice Nora I'm upset that I had to make it. I don't know if things would have worked out differently if we'd capitulated, taken responsibility for things we hadn't said or done, rolled over, been walked all over; I doubt things would have worked out in the long term.

We didn't cut our son out, he cut us out. When we refused to do any or all of the aforementioned and 'stayed away' as requested that was us refusing to play along.

Dorothyflowers

Araabra Sun 19-Feb-17 18:41:25

Dorothy16 Spot on. Every bit, spot on.

Yogagirl Sun 19-Feb-17 18:22:33

35 posts yet to read shock but just want to make the point I never said to my D about a gypsy way of life being hard at all, I didn't know he & his family were gypsy till after I was 'cut out', I did say in the courts that I wanted my GD [not his C] to learn our culture, which she wouldn't do with us all being 'cut out' of her life. If I had know he was a gypsy, it would have made no difference to me, I liked him and his family till I & the rest of our family were 'cut out', but then I wasn't seeing the real him!

Taking my neighbour out for a Toby roast dinner now grin back later...

Norah Sun 19-Feb-17 18:05:53

Smileless2012

"Or is it that an outsider (dil) sees dysfunction and refuses to play along"; you always imply that the fault must be the parents. We saw an increasing amount of dysfunction in her and it was us who refused to play along.

Well written explanation. smile

I'll ask one more question. Ignore if you wish.

You post "it was us who refused to play along" Why are you upset with your own choice? confused

When I make a choice the rationale is that I've weighed the scenario and I'm doing what is best. Not so much for you? You did the CO, taking a stand against dysfunction is good.

I've heard my dds on the topic of co mils. A hard decision, but one they are content with.

Dorothy16 Sun 19-Feb-17 18:05:36

I am a grandparent being denied contact with my three grandchildren because their parents have cut me out. I would not want to consider any contact with my grandchildren until the adults in their lives have resolved differences and reconciled, anything other I feel would be emotionally damaging and confusing to my grandchildren. eg. "mummy and daddy don't like grandma because they don't go inside her house, drop us off and drive away" "grandma doesn't like mummy and daddy because she doesn't talk to them" I also think that my grandchildren would pick up the anomosity between the adults in their lives. So no, for me, my grandchildren come as part and parcel of reconcilliation with their parents. Of course I love my grandchildren but they are kids getting on with their innocent childhood lives, they wont be missing me, they wont be missing a relationship that they've never known or experienced. How can they miss what they've never known ? Their parents choice to keep them away, maybe if they want to know their family of origin in years to come then so be it, that's for their parents to explain to them why they felt it necessary to deny them contact with their maternal grandparents and family. Yes, I feel the pain those of you who are denied contact with your grandchildren are feeling but we really do just have to move on and find rewards in other ways, we can't cry forever and yes, I have been there, cried that river dry but am on the other side now, looking back at the wasted years, all those wasted years I spent crying and for what ? Did it bring reconcilliation ? No. Did it bring my grandchildren ? No. It was wasted years of living, eating, breathing and dreaming estrangement 24/7 what an idiot I was to waste those years. We only come this way once and so my advice would be to make the most of it, this life isn't a dress rehearsal for the next. Kind Regards to all estranged both those cut off and those doing the cut off.

Smileless2012 Sun 19-Feb-17 17:41:02

I suppose he married her because he loved her Norah. We began to see a different side to her after they married, becoming even more visible once she became pregnant with their first child, and even more so after the child was born.

She didn't see any dysfunction in our family because there was non to see. Sadly her family were, and probably still are dysfunctional. We knew her parents before she was introduced to our ES by his future m.i.l. She and I had quite a close friendship for several years. My knowledge about her family comes from conversations with her mother and her.

She'd cut her own parents out of her life which is why they married abroad with only myself and my husband there. They re established contact for a time but when our eldest GC was 18 months old she cut her mother out again, re establishing the relationship briefly when the second child was born. As far as we know, her mother is once again out of the picture.

I agree of course that there must be some attraction for their relationship or maybe it's the children who keep them together. As has been previously stated, it's not just women who stay in 'bad' relationships, men do too. A mother can make it extremely difficult for her child's father to see his children if she puts her mind to it. My brother practiced family law for 37 years and saw this scenario over and over again.

The fact that our ES chooses to stay with his wife is not an indication that we are bad, or toxic, or that he had a bad childhood etc. You always respond in the same way "Or is it that an outsider (dil) sees dysfunction and refuses to play along"; you always imply that the fault must be the parents. We saw an increasing amount of dysfunction in her and it was us who refused to play along.

The words toxic and personality disorder are thrown around when this issue is being discussed and usually directed toward EP's and GP's. I don't know what it's like to have a toxic parent, in law or GP but I know what it's like to have a toxic d.i.l. You finish a telephone conversation and she continues to talk even though you're no longer on the line so she can then act out a scene where you've hung up on her. Your son comes home from work and she tells him she saw you, you saw her and deliberately snubbed her.

A surprise birthday party is thrown for you, she's 2 months pregnant and does most of the work. Afterwards she tells your son, his brother, family members and friends that you spent the entire evening sat with your back to her and ignored her. Why on earth would a woman do that to her d.i.l. who is 2 months pregnant with her first GC?

Now the examples I've given many appear trivial but they are just the tip of the ice berg. We all know that abusers cut their victims off from family and friends. They are no longer in contact with any of the friends our ES had had for years before he met her. The only family member he is contact with is his brother and he's in Aus. Far enough away geographically not to pose a threat. The last time he was here he arranged to go out for the day with his brother and nephew, just the 3 of them but she turned up anyway.

We've all heard of stockholm syndrom, where the captive becomes so dependent on their captor that not only do they feel unable to break free, they don't want too.

You post from your own experiences and I post from mine. My husband asks me 'why do you bother to keep putting on the posts that you do, to keep reiterating time after time that not all EP's deserve the way they've been treated?'. I do it because of the insurmountable pain that estrangement causes, I do it because we have the AC with whom we'd had such a wonderful relationship with for 27 years no longer wants us in his life and wont allow us to see our GC. I do it because it isn't black and white, sometimes there is smoke without fire.

I do it because of the fact that so many are prepared to believe that parents who don't deserve to be treated this way 'must have done something'. I do it because all the time such behaviour is accepted, justified and condoned it makes it easier for AC to behave in this appalling way without justification.

Araabra Sun 19-Feb-17 16:49:43

Thanks for the kind wishes, Starlady, a proper holiday is on the horizon. smile

Araabra Sun 19-Feb-17 16:41:10

Starlady "Have a nice vacation, Araabra!"

Childminding is not a proper holiday. GPs do what they have to do.

RedheadedMommy Sun 19-Feb-17 16:17:03

ICantEven I can completely and utterly sympathise is everything you have written. This definitely stuck out for me..

'We are talking about a woman who would rather "have her turn" than make sure a baby had his most basic needs met! She would not give a hungry newborn back to his mother to eat, and she felt justified in this. She made no secret of the fact that she had no issue undermining my parenting directly to my child, in front of me, just as she does with her daughter. She completely ignored the fact that I was a new mother, in need of rest and respite, and recovering from major abdominal surgery. She completely ignored her son's anxiety over being a new parent. My needs didn't matter, my husband's needs didn't matter, and my baby's needs didn't matter - the only things that mattered were what she wanted and her opinions. '

This is why we set boundaries for DD2 so we could avoid this.

'Yes, it has been made perfectly clear to my MIL (repeatedly, ad nauseum) what she has done/is doing that we find disrespectful, inappropriate, and abusive. And yes, we have told her exactly what she would need to do to repair the damage she has done. And yes, if you asked her what happened, she would still tell you she has no idea why her son doesn't want her to visit anymore, or let her see her grandson.'

I could of wrote that myself. If my DH wasn't an only child i'd swear you were my sister in law.

Norah Sun 19-Feb-17 16:12:31

Smileless2012 "We had a loving relationship with our ES for 27 years. That is not my interpretation of our relationship, that's how our relationship was. Now it's over, not because of anything we did and not because we're toxic but because of the woman he married. That may be unpalatable to some but it's the truth."

I'm sure, in some cases, dil is difficult. But why is it that they're married?

Or is it that an outsider (dil) sees dysfunction and refuses to play along?

There must be some attraction for ds. The ds stays with dil for reasons GP are not aware of.

Or he would leave. (Or insert sil and dd).

Norah Sun 19-Feb-17 15:45:34

ICantEven " Historically there are more examples of parents disowning children than vice versa"

I expect you're correct. Many elderly parents believe their AC should do as they say, follow along blindly, and live up to vague expectations.

The old matriarchal (and patriarchal) ways are over.

IME, that doesn't happen any longer. Thus (confused) parents are CO.

Smileless2012 Sun 19-Feb-17 14:10:25

Yes, quite right IcantEven, I always say that believing a lie doesn't make it a truth and refusing to believe the truth doesn't make it a lie.

ICantEven Sun 19-Feb-17 14:01:53

You really don't feel like you can say anything. I don't know that I agree that estrangement is epidemic - we are the only people I know who have resorted to cutting off a relative. Aside from kids who get disowned for coming out or not taking over the family business or living up to parents expectations or whatever ... I don't personally know anyone in that situation but I know that it still happens. Historically there are more examples of parents disowning children than vice versa, it seems to me.

Epidemic or not, it certainly is silent. You can't express sadness over the decision because people tell you to just change your mind - you did it to yourself! If only it were so simple! I imagine those on both sides are somewhat embarrassed to admit they have no contact with a parent/child. We certainly don't go shouting it from the mountain tops. We are just very lucky that most of my husband's extended family had no disillusions about how she treated her children, and some of her other family members. I get the impression she was a victim herself, judging from what I've heard about her own mother - but that's all hearsay. And unfortunately, while it explains a lot, it doesn't change anything.

I think the shame and embarrassment of being half of one of those broken relationships leads people to be very defensive. When you are the adult child having to cut off a parent, you are likely to sympathize with other adult children in the same situation - but you have no way of knowing what that other person's situation really was, only, at best, their perception of it. The same goes for grandparents who have been cut off. If you go back to the beginning of this thread, I saw a lot of posts from people who couldn't seem to accept that there might be a situation wherein a grandchild-grandparent relationship was just not in a child's best interest. I found that hard to come to terms with myself, how much harder would it be for a grandparent who can't imagine not having a place in a grandchild's life? As a mother I can't fathom how a mother could ever harm her own child - and yet I know that it happens. There are always exceptions to what we think should be a given.

In real life, people do spend a lot of time defending my MIL and trying to explain away her actions as well intended. The fact remains - only those who are in that relationship truly know what happened or what caused it to break down. And sometimes, not even then. It's a lose-lose situation, really. The best you can hope for is that the other side will have an epiphany and take steps to reconcile, but you can't count on it.

My mom always used to say "the truth is the truth, whether or not you choose to accept it." The same goes for others' acceptance of the truth. Disbelief, denial, or doubt won't ever change the truth.

Smileless2012 Sun 19-Feb-17 13:29:13

Yes Icantevenof course we appreciate that CO a parent and GP for some is the only option left open to them but why cant some posters accept that this type of behaviour can occur because their AC and/or their AC's partner is to blame, that they are 'toxic'?

Your frank post was upsetting to read, I'm sorry that you and your family have had to go through so much. I wouldn't dream of asking you what, if anything of your own behaviour may have contributed to the situations you've described and I very much doubt, and hope, no one else would.

Sadly, all too frequently, the same can't be said of posts from EP's and GP's. A few days ago I posted if not on this estrangement thread, one of the others, how thrilled Mr. S. and I were that a man we've known since he was 12 has asked us to be God parents to his youngest child. He and his wife are fully aware of our plight, horrified at the way we've been treated, and by entrusting us with the spiritual well being of their child have given us a boost beyond measure.

One response was that this man wouldn't have spent as much time with us as our ES and so his experience of us would have been different (or words to that effect). Once again, either by implication or directly, the same mantra is applied 'we must have done something wrong'.

We had a loving relationship with our ES for 27 years. That is not my interpretation of our relationship, that's how our relationship was. Now it's over, not because of anything we did and not because we're toxic but because of the woman he married. That may be unpalatable to some but it's the truth.

Jayanna9040 Sun 19-Feb-17 13:23:07

Totally agree, and sometimes it's so awful you feel you just can't tell anyone!

ICantEven Sun 19-Feb-17 13:18:14

Again, not saying that anyone on here deserves to have been CO or is a toxic grandparent, but even my clearly toxic MIL has feelings. I have no doubt she will feel (what she believes to be) love and longing for a relationship with my son. To be honest, we feel that too. It's just that we are not responsible for her feelings, but we are responsible for him. Honestly, I can't think of a more difficult decision in my life. My husband is obviously much more upset than I am - he's had to come to terms with the fact that he can't trust his own mother not to hurt his son, and he now has to face the fact that he's a victim of abuse. To suggest that our decision was made lightly would crush him.

And of course there are going to be situations where adult children are being petty, or influenced by a new partner. I feel like they are probably the minority, but they must exist. It's just impossible for anyone outside of that broken relationship to know exactly what the whole story is - and even they might not know! All I know is that, when it comes to relationships, there is a whole lot that even those closest to you just don't know and could never guess. My dad was certainly shocked by a lot of what has now come out. The only people who know what happens behind closed doors is those who were there.

Jayanna9040 Sun 19-Feb-17 12:39:40

A post from the heart, Icanteven. For what it's worth I don't believe that contact with a grandparent who has shown that they will abuse their grandchild should be maintained even minimally. To take you child to spend time with someone who will hurt them is giving tacit approval to what will be done to them.
Like you I wouldn't suggest that this applies to any of the EP who post here. What comes over from them is the love and longing they have for their grandchildren. It's very sad when your children have someone who is the total opposite?

ICantEven Sun 19-Feb-17 12:19:01

I am not in any way suggesting that anyone on this board or in this thread is that kind of toxic grandparent (though of course that's not impossible). For those who have been estranged from their families, I feel from the other side how heartbreaking that is. I'm not suggesting any of you deserved the way you were treated by your families. But surely you must see how there are some situations where it truly is in the child's best interest not to have that grandparent in their lives, not even just for a few minutes, not even supervised.

Yes, it has been made perfectly clear to my MIL (repeatedly, ad nauseum) what she has done/is doing that we find disrespectful, inappropriate, and abusive. And yes, we have told her exactly what she would need to do to repair the damage she has done. And yes, if you asked her what happened, she would still tell you she has no idea why her son doesn't want her to visit anymore, or let her see her grandson, (or why her daughter feels that way too) because she knows she's an exemplary parent and grandparent. Again, I'm not saying that's the situation for anyone who is here on these boards as an estranged grandparent. I'm simply saying that there are some truly toxic people out there who are in utter denial about the effect they have on those closest to them. And that effect can be just as strong from an interaction that lasts only a few minutes as one that lasts days or years. I still haven't emotionally recovered from the way she withheld my baby from me and made me feel like I was less of a mother and less of a wife for not being able to stand up (literally) for myself and take care of my own baby without help. And I'm 31, not 3, or 5, or 8 ... imagine how she could emotionally damage a child seeking her approval, because she's his grandma. She did it to me in a minute and a half, imagine what she could do with "just an hour at the park."

So no, you can't have a relationship with a child if you can't have a healthy relationship with the child's parents - I don't care who you are. And I'm truly sorry to those who have children who are not interested in reconciling, because we would love to be in a situation where MIL says she's willing to change her behaviour and do all the therapy work and have a healthy relationship with us and our child, but our hands are tied unless and until she's willing to honestly reflect on her own behaviour, actually listen to and respect her children's feelings, and admit that there's a problem with the current state of affairs.

ICantEven Sun 19-Feb-17 12:17:42

Wow. I just read this whole thread. Just wow.

Early on, a poster made this comment:

The behaviour and attitudes I mentioned had nothing to do with interference fuelled by over exuberance. I was thinking of grandparents, usually grandmothers, who regard themselves as the single most important person in a grandchild's life, who criticise parents, usually mummy, to the child, deliberately treat the child in ways that are contrary to the family's usual practice in matters such as snacks, discipline, bedtimes, potty training, etc. and, knowingly or not, set out to disrupt the family dynamic. I know of one grandmother who repeatedly told her grandchild that mummy didn't really love him and that the only person who did was herself, desperately confusing a young child who loved both his mummy and grandmother. The result was behavioural problems, much distress in the family and an isolated grandmother. Perhaps the word toxic is appropriate.

Those words resonated with me, because they describe almost exactly the kind of toxic relationship that I believe my son is in danger of being in.

I grew up in a loving family. I had wonderful, involved grandparents and an amazing extended family. They were loving and supportive, but never overbearing; they were always willing to lend an ear to listen, but still understood that most of the details of my life were not actually their business, and never pried - they understood that any information I trusted them with was a privilege, not their right. Suffice it to say, I could never understand how anyone could ever just cut off all contact with a family member, forever.

That was before I got married.

My MIL is overbearing to say the least. Many people don't understand why she causes me so much anxiety, but that's usually because I haven't told them the whole story. She invites herself for weeklong visits that we don't find out about until the plane tickets are booked. She calls my (and my husband's) house "our house" even though she never contributed financially or otherwise to its purchase (why should she). She shows up for her visits with groceries, insists on cooking all the meals, and prepares meals I don't even eat. I'm mostly vegetarian and make as much as I can from scratch, and despite the fact that both her daughters are vegetarians too, and she accommodates their diets, at my house she cooks pot roast because she thinks my husband needs to eat more meat, and buys dozens of prepackaged "just add meat" meal starters. She reorganizes my kitchen and closets. She enters our bedroom without knocking. She tries to do my laundry. In her mind, she's helping, and it doesn't matter to her how we feel about it. I feel it's highly disrespectful, and my husband tells her that EVERY visit. He even calls her numerous times before each visit to remind her that we don't want her to do those things. Yet every visit, she does them, and she appears shocked when we get upset. In short, she doesn't respect the way my husband and I run our household, or our decisions about our home and family in general.

She is also very controlling. She is constantly trying to give us money for things that we have decided we don't value enough to spend our hard earned money on (like cable TV, or a second vehicle). Every time, we turn down the money, because we are perfectly capable of managing our finances. Aside from our mortgage, we have no other debt. About two weeks after she leaves, my husband will have a sudden personal crisis, convinced that he doesn't make enough money, and convinced that he has failed in life because he didn't finish university and chose a trade instead. It took me almost a year and a half of marriage to realize he only ever felt that way a few weeks after she had offered us money for something she felt we needed that we didn't actually want. She also frequently mentions, usually through veiled statements, the fact that he didn't finish his degree.

She's also manipulative. When my husband doesn't return a text right away, or call her at least twice a week, she laments how her children don't appreciate her. When she visited her daughter the last time, two of the kids were fighting and tantruming at bedtime (both under 5) and she told her daughter and her son in law, in front of their children, that they were awful parents, and that her own children certainly never did things like that. Then she spanked one of the kids and her daughter told her that she was absolutely not allowed to lay a hand on any of her children, and so my MIL said if she wasn't going to be appreciated, she might just never come back to visit and her grandchildren wouldn't get to know their grandmother. Her daughter told her if that's what she wanted to do, they couldn't stop her. A few months later we all had suicide threat emails in our inboxes, because she couldn't believe how her daughter had mistreated her by cutting her out of her grandchildren's lives. We called the crisis line, and spent the entire night coordinating calls between the siblings, her, and the crisis line, because 2 of her 3 kids live 500-1000 km away, all 3 in different cities. I had to miss the next day of work because I got no sleep that night. I learned after that incident that she has threatened suicide numerous times when her own children were small as well as when they had grown, and had even said it in front of her grandchildren. My husband was afraid when he was little to make a mistake that would disappoint her, in case she might kill herself.

When I was pregnant I had awful nausea and vomiting throughout my whole pregnancy. My husband had to prepare all the meals and do all the dishes - I couldn't handle food or dishes without throwing up. He actually had to learn to cook, and he has become very good at it now too, but whenever he would tell his mother he had learned how to make something new (he was so proud of himself) she would make a comment to him asking why I wasn't cooking for him. She would tell me that I should be cooking for him, "because he works all day". I worked longer hours than my husband did. She couldn't bring herself to congratulate her son on his new skill. One visit she refused to eat what he had prepared because she "doesn't like to eat that," and I think because she was upset we had put our foot down about her trying to cook all our meals (but that's my guess only, not fact).

I don't say all of this to vilify her, I say it so that you have some idea of what it's like to interact with a truly toxic parent, one who denies and dismisses your feelings and your needs because they conflict with what she wants. And this is only the tip of the iceberg. For two years of marriage, I put up with all of this because she is my husband's mother, and when I married him I married his family, and family is important (and I didn't fully understand the extent of her abusive behaviour). No one is perfect, not even family, right? Who was I to judge her behaviour? "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone ..."

Then I had my son. He was born by c section, and he was a heavy baby. She came to visit when he was three weeks old, and I still couldn't get out of bed or up off the couch without assistance. I certainly wasn't able to do household chores. She made comments about how I could/should get things for myself, and told me that I should stop waking my husband up in the middle of the night to pick up the baby and hand him to me to feed him, because my husband really needs his sleep. I had been struggling with getting him latched on properly because I had engorgement from all the fluids, but I was working regularly with a lactation consultant, who gave the usual advice: feed often, feed on demand, watch for early hunger cues, don't wait until he's frantic and crying. My MIL decided I was feeding him too often, and holding him too much. She informed me of her opinion, and I told her I would continue to follow the advice I had been given by a medical professional. She asked to hold him, and I agreed. A few minutes later, I saw him rooting and putting his hands in his mouth. I told her he was hungry and I needed to feed him. She told me he was NOT hungry, turned her back on me, and left the room, chattering in his ear about how his mommy had no idea what she was doing, but don't worry, grandma is here. I couldn't get up to follow her, and even if I could have, I couldn't have physically taken him from her anyway, and she knew it. My husband was at work. I sat there crying until 15 minutes later she brought him back to me because he was screaming, and I had to endure an extremely painful feed because he was far too frantic to latch properly, and bleeding nipples, because they hadn't yet healed from all the damage from his poor latches. My husband was furious when he found out, but when he told her that she was way out of line and had no right to treat me or the baby like that, she argued with him, told him he was wrong and she was right, and then took a baby book she had been reading that my SIL had sent us as a gift, and underlined in pen all of the places where it said babies only need to eat every three hours. My lactation consultant had already warned me to ignore the feeding advice in that book because it was wrong and would jeopardize my milk supply and long term breastfeeding success. My MIL tried to say it only happened because she'd only been holding the baby for two minutes and she deserved to have her turn, and he'd just eaten an hour ago so he didn't need to eat anyway, because the book said. Never mind what the baby clearly wanted!

These are only my stories. She made plenty of comments to my husband that made him feel incompetent as a new father. Thank goodness my dad and my aunt had visited first, and told him how wonderful he was doing at adjusting to having a new baby and taking care of me (because he truly was doing an amazing job). He had been so worried he wouldn't know what to do or would make a mistake. Where my dad and my aunt told him he seemed to have really tapped into his fatherly instincts, his mother hovered over every diaper change telling him what to do, completely ignoring the fact that he had been doing it for three weeks without her there to tell him what to do and how he was already screwing it up. Throughout her entire visit, my husband's confidence in himself as a father slowly eroded to almost nothing. She left just in time. He only got a bit of that confidence back when his aunt (his mother's sister, no less) came to visit, took one look at the baby and proclaimed that we must be wonderful parents, because just look at him! I realized in that moment that his own mother hadn't said one positive thing to him or to me about our parenting. Don't get me wrong, it isn't that we need people telling us we are good parents; it's just that we don't need those who are supposed to support us to be critical of every move we make, and imply that we have no idea what we are doing. Even if it were the truth, it isn't productive.

We are talking about a woman who would rather "have her turn" than make sure a baby had his most basic needs met! She would not give a hungry newborn back to his mother to eat, and she felt justified in this. She made no secret of the fact that she had no issue undermining my parenting directly to my child, in front of me, just as she does with her daughter. She completely ignored the fact that I was a new mother, in need of rest and respite, and recovering from major abdominal surgery. She completely ignored her son's anxiety over being a new parent. My needs didn't matter, my husband's needs didn't matter, and my baby's needs didn't matter - the only things that mattered were what she wanted and her opinions.

Does anyone honestly think that any good can come of any form of relationship with a woman like that? She has emotionally abused her children their whole lives by making them feel responsible for her feelings and her behaviour. She has demonstrated that she will repeat those same emotionally abusive behaviours with her grandchildren. She doesn't think it's necessary to treat her children or their spouses with respect or dignity in their own homes. She will put her desires ahead of the needs of a newborn.

I know there is lots of evidence that relationships with grandparents are beneficial to children's well being and development. I work with young children, I've read the research on the benefits of multigenerational relationships. The thing is, no grandchild will benefit from an abusive relationship with a grandparent simply because they are the grandparent. I can give my child those same benefits by fostering supervised relationships with seniors in a local nursing home who are complete strangers to my child, or with all the lovely older members of my church who watched me get bigger and bigger in pregnancy, and then admired him at his baptism, and continue to ask after him week after week at mass. Shared DNA is not the reason grandparent relationships are good for kids. If the grandparent is not capable of having a healthy relationship with their adult child (who is theoretically capable of protecting themselves from abuse, and has the ability to understand that it is not their fault that they have been abused), then they are certainly NOT a safe person to be around their grandchild, supervised or not, for one minute or one hour. Frankly, I can't believe anyone would dare to suggest that I should expose my child to that person when I KNOW what harm they are capable of. I wish that things were different, but wishing doesn't change reality.

Believe me, it's a heartbreaking thing for me to do. My own mother died when I was 21; cutting out my MIL leaves my son and any future children with no grandmothers, and only one grandfather because my husband also lost his father in his twenties. I STILL have all 4 of my grandparents, alive and well, and I'm 31; my son deserves the grandparent experience that I had as a child and a young woman! But life doesn't operate that way. I didn't deserve to lose my mother, but it happened. And having no grandmothers is better than having a grandmother who is actually incapable of truly loving her grandchild - because no matter what she says, how can anyone call the way she treated him and his mother loving? Children are not able to understand that a grandparent's inability to have unconditional love for them is not because the child is in some way unlovable. You do not put your most precious and most vulnerable gift in life in harm's way like that. You just don't. They can learn about tricky people with examples from people they are not supposed to love, and who are not supposed to love them. They don't need loving relationships confounded with abusive ones, that sets them up to be abused by other people who claim to love them.

Starlady Sun 19-Feb-17 02:34:57

Have a nice vacation, Araabra!

Starlady Sun 19-Feb-17 02:34:21

I don't think many people co others for something that just annoys them like wearing neon green. Nor do I think a mil should have to change her style - or her basic personality - just because her dil or ac find it annoying. Maybe she finds it annoying that they always wear gray or whatever.

True, ac and dil can co mil for wearing neon green. True, also, their kids are part of the co package. But that's why, if I were a young parent, I would think twice - no three times, maybe 10 - before coing someone just for doing something that annoys me. Not fair, imo, to deny kids a relationship with a GP just because you're annoyed with something the GP does. And perhaps the kids like the neon green... just saying...

I wouldn't co somebody for such a trivial reason, anyway. But I think it is worse if kids are affected.

But again, I don't believe most people co for such a petty reason as what color someone wears.

Starlady Sun 19-Feb-17 02:15:59

But Ankers, the parent's way of dealing with it may be to co. So we've come full circle.

This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion