Gransnet forums

AIBU

Primary literacy ...split digraphs

(65 Posts)
Jalima Thu 23-Jun-16 16:15:16

sorry, teacher of English

Jalima Thu 23-Jun-16 16:14:52

I have never heard of that term (although I do know what one is I realise) hmm

#motherofenglishteacher

Lillie Thu 23-Jun-16 15:18:15

It is important to know that the magic "e" changes the sound of the vowel, just like the accent does in French. Simple.
But as for the posh name, I dislike it. It sounds too complicated! I'm guessing those children who enjoy language will retain it, whereas others will file it in the back of their brains along with stressed syllables and such like. grin

annemac101 Thu 23-Jun-16 14:54:53

Yes Elegran that's what I was taught at school. I've never heard of split digraph. A bit too technical I think.

Elegran Thu 23-Jun-16 14:48:01

Going back even further "The e at the end made the other vowel say its name" instead of its sound. Knowing how the final e works is a part of learning to read fluently. Reading hop or hope, dim or dime, makes sense of what is printed.

It doesn't matter what the rule is called, though why it has to be changed every few years is beyond me. Makes it a "new approach" I suppose. The innovators love that.

Waveney Thu 23-Jun-16 14:41:14

Those of us who taught in the seventies ( and used 'Words and Pictures') would have called a split diagraph 'magic e 'and later it became 'modifying e' . My granddaughter refers to a split diagraph confidently but I think that would have been the case whatever it was called!

Anya Thu 23-Jun-16 14:15:21

Take a word like plane. The letter A is pronounced as its name in the alphabet, rather than the soft a in plan, because of the letter E at the end of the word.

That is a split digraph as opposed to spelling the word PLAIN.

Joelsnan Thu 23-Jun-16 14:10:30

What is a split digraph?
I have managed to retirement without this knowledge and considered to be reasonably literate.

Luckygirl Thu 23-Jun-16 13:58:15

"either"

Luckygirl Thu 23-Jun-16 13:57:50

The nonsense of course is that those children who do not know A from B are also required to know these obscure facts and are simply rendered completely confused to no purpose whatsoever for wither them or the bright sparks. Some of these obscure grammatical items have apparently been made up by the DofE. Sigh.

Elegran Thu 23-Jun-16 13:11:45

School is full of obscure facts. Who knows which of them will come in useful? If she enjoys using words and writing, perhaps that is just the kind of bit of knowledge she finds exciting - which will make her more interested in learning other bits of knowledge. Her brother may not find it interesting or useful. They are different - vive la difference!

Luckygirl Thu 23-Jun-16 13:04:45

FFS! - what nonsense. I am sure that her whole future life does not hinge on knowing these obscure facts.

Elegran Thu 23-Jun-16 12:57:16

Sorry, he not she.

Elegran Thu 23-Jun-16 12:56:45

If she is proud to know it, then it is not too early for her (helping her to get it right could be useful - but when we first learn anything we don't always get it quite right)

Nandalot Thu 23-Jun-16 12:52:48

AIBU to be concerned that my DG, just turned five, has come come home and is proudly talking about 'split digraphs'? (Not wholly correctly as it happens.) I just feel that too much emphasis is being placed on the technicalities of language at too young an age. She loves writing and enjoys spending time writing pages and pages. She might occasionally ask for a spelling but often she goes for the phonetic spelling. I rarely correct her as I don't want to blunt her enthusiasm. Her twin brother is more interested in his cars than writing. Though he does like writing signs for his car park. I really wonder how much he is getting from learning about split digraphs or if he is being turned off by the emphasis on technicalities.
I have no complaints about the primary school they attend, rather the curriculum they are forced to follow.