If that woman had managed to put her points across in a calm and reasoned manner it may have been easier to understand her arguments.
Having watched part of the debate I found her irritating, jumpy, probably as you say, Bridgeit, passionate in her views, but trying to follow her points was difficult because of the way she delivered them. She also interrupted and talked across others who were trying to put forward their views. An annoying trait, as it could make listeners less inclined to be sympathetic to any valid points she may have.
In fact, a poor communicator although she is, I think, a university lecturer.