I do agree that people should be aware of the significance of Easter and other key events to Christian religion (and of key beliefs in other religions), but I don't think anyone can or should dictate how people ought to spend Easter. We, fortunately, do not now live in a society where everyone must worship a particular religion or else be a social outcast, or worse.
I too dislike the way every occasion now - Easter, Mother's Day, Valentine's Day, Firework Night, Halloween, End of School Proms, Christmas, Childbirth, etc, etc, etc - is so cynically exploited in order to make money. But surely that is a separate issue.
Atheism is, as I understand it, disbelief in any religion and therefore does not include acts of worship. I think I'm right in saying the paganism is a religion in that it is made up of certain beliefs and contains acts of worship. Agnosticism, I think, is a state of acceptance that neither belief nor disbelief in a god or a religion can be proved or disproved.
anniebach You always insist that "Christians have no problems with atheists". The premise of the original post, along with criticism of commercialism, seemed to me to imply criticism of those who do not celebrate Easter in a religious way, in particular by attending church. Given that the post was couched in those terms, it is hardly surprising that it received posts from people who had a non-religious take on the issue.
The few devout Christians that I know are not at all showy about what they believe in but spend much of their time in helping others rather than in trying to demonstrate spiritual one upmanship.
Religions or belief systems are not inborn. They are cultural phenomena. Christians are born into a Christian family/culture, as are Muslims/Jews/Hindus/Sikhs, etc etc. And yet each religion, though some are more tolerant of different beliefs than others, sees itself as being the true religion.