I am very much in favour of Citizen's Assemblies such as they use in Ireland and I would have thought this is just the sort of template a forum such as GN could use to help us have better, more knowledgeable conversations.
They could, where we cannot, chose a single subject, employ a proper chair for the discussion, select the "citizen's" who should be limited number and a cross section of members rather than citizens in this case. The are big enough to that they will attract the experts and interest groups needed to inform the members of the group. I don't think Ireland includes politicians.
Other members would not be excluded as obviously discussion threads could go along side what would be a longer process than a usual discussion, perhaps once a week or every couple of weeks for a specific number of "assemblies" on one topic. Voting by the members could also take place at the end which would no doubt lead to further discussion on threads outside the "assembly" thread.
Otherwise all that happens is opinions are swapped - often not based on fact and people get angry because their opinion is not agreed with. Gransnet - or GN & MN combined - could really facilitate and foster interest in political matters rather than just sit back and watch the crash. There was a huge amount of scepticism in Ireland but this method - Citizen's Assemblies - have worked very well. Perhaps GN could wake up the old and out of date political parties and encourage better debate and a way of increasing real knowledge.
The first topic in Ireland was "how we best respond to the challenges and opportunities of an ageing population". I imagine most of us would have an interest in that.
By special request, let’s discuss our favourite Classic Music and why?
Is it possible to remove a topic from "I'm on"



