welbeck
maddyone
Parents have always bought school uniforms.
that's not quite the case.
when i was at school it was unusual to have a specific uniform for infants or juniors.
we generally wore plain dark clothes, navy or grey, the only uniform for juniors was the addition of a tie.
many secondaries did not have uniform in London, even those that did, it was minimal, usually only the tie and a sew-on badge was specific.
now so many schools seem to ape private schools in having very expensive, single-supplier items. why branded sports kit.
i think it is a way of deterring poorer pupils.
The local Academy has uniform, only stipulations are blazer, school colours for sportswear, all supplied by local outfitters, who deal with all the schools in our area, all children wear trousers, white shirts which can be bought cheaply at Asda, Tesco etc, shorts for games and PE. No stipulation re Clark’s shoes. Not aping private schools, surely more inclusive, no vying for the latest Nike,or other designer gear, and many parents not being able to afford the latest styles. If there is a problem outside at least you can identify the school the child came from. School has second hand shop, as does a volunteer centre in the village, for school swaps. Not sure how having a uniform excludes poorer pupils, help can be had if needed. Most schools do not stipulate designer shirts or trousers, so can be got from Primark, Tesco etc who sell cheap school wear, even school colours so choices can be had.