VioletSky
I've just seen how that will be twisted
*I like debate*
Another pass/agg dig
. You are accusing people of twisting things (aggressive) without saying how the alleged twisting will be done, or who will do it (passive). Additionally, it gives the impression that you are pre-empting something after realising that your statement about personal comments and how Some People allow damaging behaviour is also passive aggressive, and are attempting to get in first with your accusations against those Some People. Any responses will, you hope, be interpreted as 'twisting'.
A personal dig is still personal whether the digger names the intended 'diggee' or not. You claim that you and Glorianny receive personal comments, but can't you see that this is a matter of your 'opponents' on these threads being honest about who and what they are addressing? Disagreement is not personal, and you (generic) can be personal without naming the accused.
Conversely, naming someone then saying something vague is equally PA. What have you actually said here, for instance:
Given comments I have read from you on other issues that are not trans related, and doodledog if she is interested... I genuinely never expected that comment to be an issue with either of you
But silencing different views is not healthy... it doesn't find a way forward that suits everyone. That shouldn't be the end goal in discussion... I can prove that too because over time I have listened to the needs of women and tried to accommodate them in any solutions or ideas I propose.. because I understand that while some things don't bother me, they bother others...
If I weren't more accepting of trans people than you two, we would probably get on
The post was addressed to Dickens, and named me, but you have not told us what we are supposed to have done - or not in any sort of meaningful way, at least (passive). How can either of us defend ourselves without knowing the charges? We can't, so have no right of reply (aggressive)
You have made digs (aggressive) that can't be answered because they are meaningless or implicit. You indirectly suggest that others are 'silencing views', unspecified comments are 'an issue', you imply that you are the only one who understands that the views of others are relevant - all of these are aggressive, but couched in a passive way.
You say you 'like debate', but don't engage in it. Why not look at what people are saying, and address their points, instead of claiming to have 'proved' things, and making digs at our characters?