Iam64
GrannyIvy’s description of her son-in-law’s personality tends to be confirmed by his behaviour in relation to his attempt to disrupt the family holiday plans. I assume he’s given consent to the children being taken out of the country but didn’t realise the flight times meant leaving school two hours early. Objecting to this is indeed ‘toxic, cruel and self centred’. It’s about power over his ex, not about the best interests or welfare of the children.
School is in a very difficult position. The holiday may be a package so re-arranging flights not an option.
I understand the cost of legal involvement but this needs mum to have legal advice.
I can’t imagine any family court judge wanting this time wasting before them. Parents with or without lawyers would be sent off to reach a solution in the best interests of children,
Not all individuals are able to compromise in the best interests of their children sadly. This mum will need to avoid conflict which probably as the OP says involve conceding at times,
Although Glorianny is talking-sense in her post and giving advice that most impartial on-lookers would agree with in regard to maintaining 'good' relations with the father, it also has to be said that many of us recognise a man who is bitter and vindictive when divorced. In fact some have committed awful crimes in order to punish their ex-partners. And women are not immune to this type of behaviour either. I'm saying this in defence of the grandmother who, though not impartial, has probably witnessed first-hand the controlling behaviour of a man who is, clearly, not putting the best interests of his children first.
Notwithstanding the cost - I agree that Mum needs legal advice- and quick. He has notified the school that he is not in agreement with the plan, so he means business. They are now in an awkward position.
If the mother were taking the children out of school for two days during normal term-time, one could say he has a point - but this is two hours on an end-of-term Friday. I don't know how much has changed since I was at school but on that last day, no 'real' work was done after lunch.
The ex probably didn't realise that the flight times would involve removing the children from school early - we don't know if mum made that clear at the outset. But now he does know, and by Jove - he's going to capitalise on it.
This might cost the mother dearly both economically and emotionally, but I hope it's a lesson-learned for the future. Stick absolutely to the rules of the Court Order and don't give this man a bat's squeaks chance ever again to put a spoke in the wheels. He knows full well what his last-minute objections will incur, and he also knows he has right on his side because of that Court Order. I hope this is the last time this man is able to revel in his power and control because no-one is going to benefit from it, least of all the children.