It was announced a few days ago that Claire Fremantle, the driver of the car which crashed through a fence and killed two school children at the prep school when it hit the building, will not face any charges because the medical evidence supports the fact that she had a seizure at the wheel and was unconscious throughout the event.
I believe the inquest will be held in the next few days, at which time the reasons behind the decision will be made clearer. There has been a thread over on Mumsnet, which descended into a bunfight when posters took a driver versus victims stance in terms of the amount of sympathy they had for the parties involved. The question posed was ‘Am I being unreasonable to have sympathy for the driver’.
My own feeling is that if the driver was genuinely in the throes of a seizure, and had not previously been diagnosed with any form of seizure related illness, then no blame can be apportioned. I just wondered what the consensus would be on GN, given that the general tone of threads tends to be more measured and thoughtful and less inclined to throw insults in disagreement with other posters.
“We are killing like we haven’t killed since 1967”


