M0nica
Doodledog Your childhood experience is one way that families worked in your childhood, but I think you are generalising from a sample of one.
I am a war baby, My grandmother lived with us for 5 years because her house was destroyed in the bombing, my other hrand parents lived a couple of hundred yards away. i saw them on Sunday at church and we woud walk part of he way home together, but only went to their house for family events
Then my father's job took us to another part of the country, so trips to grandparents were a big event that happened in school holidays. I knew very few people who had grandparents living locally. One of the links my best friend and I had at school were that we both had grandparents who lived in south London. As a child as a parent and as a grandparents, spontaneous visits to grandparents were not even thought of, for me, my children and now my grandchildren, visiting grandparents has meant a journey, by bus, by train, by car, and a stay over of several days to make it worthwhile
I am not suggesting that my experience was the norm either. I think there were/are many ways the relationship between genrations was /is worked out in the past as in the present.
Oh definitely. It was just an example, although I may have worded it in a way that suggested otherwise.
The point remains, though, that lifestyles evolve, and what is usual in one generation is not always the same in the next, which is the relevance to the OP, who is being expected to fit with the older neighbour's way of looking at the world.
All sorts of behaviours change, as a result of little things such as getting telephones installed and then change again as landlines become rarer, as well as big things such as it being the norm for women to work, and huge things such as wars.
There are some (not all) older people who cling to the idea that the way their generation did things was 'right', and judge younger generations in that light. Sending or not sending cards, children being grateful for presents and so on are small things that cause a lot of real hurt, but are not intended to do so.
An example (yes, a sample of one, but for illustration) is my mum hates getting Moonpig cards because she sees them as not having 'bothered to go to the shop'. My daughter sends them, and they are really thoughtful. She chooses photos and writes her own slogans to make the cards personal - to me that is far more about 'being bothered' than buying a mass-produced card in which someone else has written the verse. It's all about perception, isn't it?


