Alegrias and hollysteers
Thank god the conspirator theorist has gone. Spoke too soon.
You are clearly labelling me and making personal attacks directly at me. this is not what we do on GNet. I shall report it.
I have given information, using only facts available in the public domain and given the references where I can or where relevant. Anyone can verify them. Some research which was available for several years and has been Peer reviewed, has been censored, mysteriously, since it was simply ordinary scientific medical research.
The following is information from The Centre for Evidence Based Medicine and some the BBC if it uploads ok.
From the Centre For Evidence Based Medicine: “The only ‘circuit break’ we need now is from among the Govt’s doom-mongering scientific advisors who specialise in causing panic and little else” say Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson. Prof Heneghan says;
This nonsensical term ‘circuit breaker’ is not the only aspect of the Govt’s rhetoric that needs closer scrutiny, because it is the irrational unscientific use of language that is partly to blame for driving Ministers into making these mistakes. It is unfortunate that Mr Johnson is surrounded by mediocre Scientific advisors. It is strange and concerning that the govt is still relying on mathematical modellers who have a 20 year track record of getting things wrong. (He then points out Ferguson about whom I advise you to do your own research). 'In the week ending September 17th the England’s National Influenza Surveillance Report shows that “Rhinovirus positivity had increased by 23% in 7 days”. It is likely that the new school year set this in motion as it does every year. Covid too appears to follow this seasonal pattern picking up in the colder weather, but the death rate – so far at least – does not appear to be rising."
Prof Heneghan says, “for now the only “circuit break” we need is an end to the current cycle of bad data, bad language and shockingly bad scientific advice.”
Professor Heneghan is far from being the only very distinguished Scientist in a top position who is speaking out against what the govt are saying. For example, Nobel Prize for Science winner, Prof. Levitt of Stanford made the correct prediction of the death rate regardless of lockdown in February last as 0.04 to 0.05%. (Compare that to Ferguson!) He is saying again, now, how the ‘science’ has let us all down dreadfully. E.g. “As a group, scientists have failed the younger generation.” “Almost all the science we were hearing from organisations like the WHO was wrong”. “Nobody said to me, ‘let me check your numbers’*, they all just said, ‘stop talking like that’”. *A real scientist would have asked to check the numbers. A person with an agenda to push out would want to shut the mouth of someone whose accurate science showed results which did not support their agenda as his message was not politically acceptable.
The numbers the scientists used are all government ones.
Meanwhile, using their appalling scientists and ridiculous data analyses the government continue with inhumane treatment of our elderly relatives, who, effectively, are imprisoned and unable to touch their family or go out and be with them for the last days of their lives.
I shall endeavour to illustrate the numbers with graphs:
Bar chart shows: picture of deaths in UK that week, situation hasn’t changed massively in last 2 weeks. This is what the govt is using to justify claims of 50thousand and continue lockdown and so on.
BBC graph: death rate per 100,000 people: yes, since 2008 it was the same then, but prior to 2008 we see it was much higher and we never shut the country down then or ever before. So the BBC headline, as before, is utterly misleading, and merely for fear propaganda.