Harry & Meghan biography

No, not interested, he made his bed now he must lie in it!

No if he did he wouldn’t act in such a selfish way, he knows the
load of public duty he has dumped on his father and his brother and sister in law but doesn’t give a fig.

Does Harry not mind bringing more sadness to The Queen and Prince Charles?

No

What a way to make money

According to an article at royal central.co.uk the publisher of their book is owned by Harper Collins, owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also happens to own the Sun newspaper. As it says in the article you couldn't make it up!

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's biography has reached number one on the Top 10 Books in 24 hours New York bestseller list.

Omid Scobie, one of the co-authors, says, 'Well, this is a nice surprise.'



Do you think he's a bit backward at coming forward?

No, I wouldn't read the book even if it was free.

Of course they are at liberty to discuss what they please, as am I at liberty to express my surprise at the number of such threads and at the “strength of feeling “

I think you'll find that people on here are at liberty to discuss what they please. The OP is about M&H,so it's not surprising that they are being discussed. No one has to join in who doesn't want to.

Anniebach. I’m still trying to understand why people can go on and on and on and on and on discussing this pair and saying things like “I dislike Meghan so much “. And “ horrible pair “
Also why have you started calling her Meg ?
Am also bemused by the anti Diana stuff, the woman’s dead after all.

Apparently tomorrow is Archies birthday and they are planning a video link with the Cambridge children!!! I wonder who will supervise that? Nanny?!! I noticed the smirky look too. Horrible pair! and the green dress was hideous!!!!

I dislike Meghan so much, disliked her as a two bit actress and as soon as they got engaged I know it would lead to heartache. I wouldn't put a cent in her pocket by either buying or borrowing this book. If they want to go away, go, but I don't think that they do.

Daisyboots - your comment "I was totally finished with Harry when he was filmed at the Commonwealth Day service saying something to MM and she smiled back. The smirk on his face showed a very unpleasant person." really sums it up for me as well, I thought exactly the same - it was very uncomfortable to watch TBH

Yes, I picked up on that too and can still picture it now. And William and Kate look incredibly strained, with Kate on the verge of tears, and madam sitting smirking behind her.

Sympathy?!! I can't find one thing about these two that generates even one ounce of sympathy! For the RF, the Queen in particular I have much sympathy, but these two scoundrels, not a smidgen!

Daisyboots - your comment "I was totally finished with Harry when he was filmed at the Commonwealth Day service saying something to MM and she smiled back. The smirk on his face showed a very unpleasant person." really sums it up for me as well, I thought exactly the same - it was very uncomfortable to watch TBH.

While I have some sympathy for Harry & Meghan - I won't be buying or reading this. At their young ages, it is hardly a biography, and as some others have said - I'm not convinced it would be "without bias". Perhaps in time!

Priceless - spot on merlotgran!

Diana use to co operate with the press, tip them off when she
wanted to be photographed, remember the photograph of her
in a operating theatre , hair covered, mask on and diamond
earings !

by not my

What exactly do they mean my no longer co-operate?

Surely, once something is in the public domain H&M can't stop a tabloid repeating the story as long as they credit the original source?

They can't introduce their own censorship.

I’d rather read a book of full stops which would be far more interesting than reading about H&M.

Harry and Meg have named - The Sun, The Mirror, The Mail
and the Express as newspapers they will no longer cooperate
With, so they did cooperate before this announcement,
oh dear, another announcement,

No!

They are hardly free when they are relying financially on the Prince of Wales and probably the U.K. taxpayers. Outrageous hypocrisy.