I think that many people, quite rightly, have a negative view of care homes because of what has happened since the government allowed the care sector to be used as a money-making vehicle.
Many care homes providers are now loaded with massive leveraged debt from a succession of complex deals, the sole aim of which was to make money for private equity firms. These firms don’t have any interest in the sector other than as an easy and quick cash cow.
My experience has been that care homes are very, very reluctant to give a breakdown of their costs because it would mean disclosingjust how much of what is being paid for care by councils and self-funders is going to service these enormous debts. I suspect that local managers of homes which are part of a chain have little idea about the overall finances of the group. They have a menu of prices based on the degree of care needed but how are these prices quantified?
It’s a matter of public record that homes which have these high debts had double the number of Covid deaths compared to those that didn’t because the former are the homes that continually cut costs at the point of delivery to pay these debts.
Around 70p of every pound we pay in council tax is funding adult social care. Around 50% of people are self-funding so that 70p is only paying for half of the people who need care. This is one of the reasons the care cap was postponed.
Instead of being complacent about this, as we enter the run up to the next general election, we should be asking the opposition parties what they intend to do about this. We need a complete restructuring of adult social care funding to take it out of the control of the money-market and people whose only motive is greed.
I have no objection to paying taxes to fund the care of vulnerable people. I accept that if my time comes, I will fund my own care, care being the operative word. I will not fund the lavish lifestyles of corporate raiders.
While we are stuck with this current system, the key is to find a home which is still managed and controlled by the owner(s), preferably family-run by people with hands-on knowledge of caring.
There are too many places that, while they might not be loaded with leveraged debt, are owned by very greedy people.
Runwood Homes have been in the news several times over the last couple of years, criticised for paying its directors enormous amounts (57 million over five years) while CQC reports distressingly poor standards of care. Residents left for hours in soiled incontinence pads, roughly-handled and restrained while directors buy themselves second homes in Knightsbridge. In 2020, Runwood Homes claimed two million in Covid grants (including furlough payments - go figure). Coincidentally, its principle director and shareholder paid himself an extra two million in dividends. Funny that. Except it isn’t because we are all funding this greed.