There is a thread on MN saying that people should clean items before putting them on Freecycle and similar, and there are some similarities with this one, I think. Some on the MN thread are saying that if they are giving stuff away it is often as part of a clearout. They just want rid of it and would prefer to let someone have it if they can use it than for it to go to landfill, but expect any work to be done by the taker, not the giver. Others seem to think they are doing people a favour by taking things from them and expect the donor to scrub things up before offering them.
I can see both sides - someone else's grot is different from one's own, but at the same time if someone is mid-clearout they might be tempted just to send something to landfill than have to clean it up and then risk rejection from a shop, or a no-show from a Freecycle collector.
I think there is a clash of attitudes where charity shops/Freecycle are involved, and neither is wrong. Charity shops of the Jumble Sale/Aladdin's Cave type used to have all kinds of random items. People could try to match a tea set that had a broken saucer, and if it was a popular style there was a chance that Oxfam (or somewhere) might have the saucer they wanted for pennies. Now they only sell full sets of expensive brands and charge £££ for them. Similarly, there might be a dress with a button missing, but buyers could easily sew on a button and get a good quality item they might not have been able to afford new for a small charge and the cost of a button. Now even expensive items that are not 100% perfect are binned. When women were at home all day they may have had time to sew on buttons catch hems and iron clothes before donating them, but these days many are too busy to do that even with their own clothes.
It used to be a simple deal - charity shops had items that had no intrinsic value (unless you were lucky) but could be worth a lot to someone who happened to be looking for a particular thing, or who could put in the time scrubbing or repairing them. The donators got rid of things they didn't want, and felt good about supporting causes they believed in.
Now expectations have changed. People have less time, things like clothes can often be bought cheaply when new, not as many people can mend. Also, fast fashion means that there is a quicker turnover of items as people dispose of more things than they used to.
Meanwhile, many charity shops see themselves as boutiques and only want perfect items in pristine condition, and won't accept anything less. Regulations based on health and safety mean that there are restrictions on what they are legally allowed to take. Obviously shops have limited floorspace, and can't house everything that people give, but at the same time, they rely on good will from donors, which they will destroy by rudeness and making people feel rejected. Also, people often drop things off on the way to somewhere, and if they are rejected will have to take them along. A combination of those things is likely to put people off donating.
Maybe if the model changed, and people offered things for sale to charity shops instead of giving them away it would feel less offensive if they were rejected?
WORD ASSOCIATION - 9th May 2026


