Anyone who has visited the Abusive Images Unit (used to be called Obscene Publications) would be traumatised to see banks of monitors lining one wall, with videos of REAL children being subjected to what amounts to sexual torture. What the average person thinks is pornography is low level soft porn and erotica. The call for having no censorship doesn't make sense when you see what is being traded by paedophiles and circulated to, and between, children.
Profit from production of abusive images far exceeds revenue from drugs trafficking. The Copine Scale rates the seriousness of the content and distribution of abusive material, to enable assessment, conviction and sentencing of offenders found with such material. It was developed to try to end the myth that porn doesn't do any harm.
I don't support censorship in general, but when it comes to the wholesale corruption of users of abusive images, I do urge very tight controls.
Think about this - if adult, well-trained, hardened police officers, specially trained for dealing with sexual offending, can be reduced to stressed-out, mentally ill men and women from being exposed to this material day after day, despite receiving support, supervision and preventative counselling from the best forensic psychologists............what chance do children have? And before anyone takes up the debate by intellectualising it, remember that every time someone clicks on an abusive image, whether it be child, man, woman or animal, that image lessens in financial value and the manufacturers of this material are busy seeking out new, younger, more frightened victims, who won't look frightened on the videos because they are given drugs to render them compliant.
Sorry to sound so forceful, but I feel very strongly about the way that fans of 'pornography' (let's call it what it is that we're concerned about - images of sexual degradation and torture) defend the right to see it. Page 3 images are the 'acceptable' end of a nasty business.